22. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2/2)

This page contains the second half of the post that was started in Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2), and it is thus strongly recommended that you read Part 1 before continuing here.


We ended Part 1 by discussing the circumnavigation of albatross, and we’re going to continue on the theme of air travel by taking a look at airline flights in the Southern hemisphere.


Air Travel in the Southern Hemisphere


South America to Australia


Do you want to join me on a flight from Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia?


Image result for booking flights gif



There’s just one catch, our journey will have to go via North America…



Image result for home alone gif


Why is that then?

… Surely it should be quicker to fly straight there, over the Antarctic region…




Well, the reason why we have to fly via North America is because all flights between Sydney and Santiago go via North America, as you can see below…

Airport codes for your reference:

  • SYD = Sydney
  • AKL = Auckland
  • SCL = Santiago
  • SFO = San Francisco
  • IAH = Houston
  • LAX = Los Angeles
  • MSP = St. Paul, MN
  • DTW = Detroit
  • ATL = Atlanta
  • SLC = Salt Lake City
  • YVR = Vancouver
  • YVZ = Toronto

Note that the first two listed are fake listings, as you will see in a video shortly.


As you can see by the red line below, North America is perfectly en-route for a trip between Sydney and Santiago, so it makes sense that flights would go through the US and Canada, as listed above.

The green line on the right corresponds to the path that would be taken if we were on a globe (which corresponds to the yellow line on the left).



Image result for flat earth dome




Don’t believe me?


Well, let’s take a look at the curious case of a October 2015 China Airlines flight from Bali, Indonesia destined for Los Angeles…


What is remarkable about this flight is that it was forced to emergency land since a woman prematurely gave birth 6 hours into the flight!

Image result for bali los angeles baby Image result for bali los angeles baby


Now, logically you’d think that a flight from Bali to LA would simply continue its route to LAX or to land in Hawaii…




However, as confirmed by an excerpt from an article in The Telegraph, the flight actually emergency landed in… Alaska…



Now why would the plane fly so far off course instead of just continuing to LAX?




The reason for that is very simple…

It landed in Alaska because Anchorage is in fact en-route to LAX from Indonesia, and it’s thus perfectly natural that it would emergency land there:




Australia to South Africa

Now, another curious flight route is the one between Australia and South Africa, where most flights are listed as going via places like Dubai, Doha, Hong Kong, and Singapore – labelled in green as #1-4 below.

Note that there are also a couple of fake listings – flight SA 280 (in yellow), and flight QF64…


The paths via Singapore, Hong Kong, or Dubai make little sense on the globe…




… but make perfect sense on a Flat Earth map…

south africa.JPG



South Africa to Brazil

Similarly, if you want to fly from South Africa to Brazil, the most popular routes all go via Europe, Senegal, or Dubai, which makes absolutely no sense on a globe map…




… but again, the flight routes make sense on the flat Earth map:



Flight Routes and Fake Flight Listings

This video does a good job of outlining all of these Southern hemisphere routes:



This video continues where the video above left off, and discusses some of the fake flight listings in a bit more depth:


“Oh but aren’t there a lot of people who have taken those routes who would say something?…”

Image result for skeptical

First of all, there aren’t actually that many flights between countries in the southern hemisphere in the first place, given that very few people actually live in the southern hemisphere:


Secondly, if the flight actually existed, given how controversial a topic this is you’d expect to see more videos of people at the gate getting spontaneously interviewed or spoken to about the flight route, but NADA.

Then there’s the fact that there’s an incredible amount of fanfare about the Qantas Santiago to Sydney flight, enough to make you sit up and wonder…

This aussie breaks it down rather humouristically for us:


There’s also plenty of encoded fake news story’s on this topic to perpetuate the lie, as outlined by here…





Flight Trackers

Flight trackers are also revealing… notice how there are no flights over the oceans in the southern hemisphere…



If flights were taking the paths over Antarctica (on a globe) then you’d think that they would show up in the flight trackers…



… but they clearly don’t!


images (3).jpg


On a globe this makes no sense, but on a Flat Earth map this is exactly what we’d expect to see…

… On the Flat Earth map there should rarely be any flights over the open oceans on the outer part of the map when all the land-mass is in the center… so you wouldn’t expect flights to show up there on the trackers.


Flights that travel over the South Atlantic between South America and Europe will usually also have their tracking switched off midway through flights to prevent accurate tracking, as you can see in this video:




Northern Hemisphere Flights


The path shown to us in Northern hemisphere flights also makes more sense on a FE map:

 Image result for sun movement flat earth


Image result for flat earth meme


For those who’d like to see more, there are numerous other interesting videos relating to flight paths on youtube, such as this one:








On the subject of flights, you might be wondering if anyone ever flew to Antarctica?

Well, there was one trained pilot who did…


Admiral Richard E. Byrd (1888 – 1957)

Admiral Byrd led a US Navy expedition to Antarctica in 1946-47 (with Rear Admiral Richard Cruzen heading-up the task-force).

At the time of the expedition every asset in the US Navy’s inventory was leveraged to Byrd for his use if needed during his exploration of Antarctica, which should give an idea into the vast scale of the project undertaken during “Operation Highjump“.

The objectives of the expedition are said to have been as follows:

  1. Training personnel and testing equipment in frigid conditions;
  2. Consolidating and extending the United States’ sovereignty over the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent (publicly denied as a goal even before the expedition ended);
  3. Determining the feasibility of establishing, maintaining, and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating possible base sites;
  4. Developing techniques for establishing, maintaining, and utilizing air bases on ice, with particular attention to later applicability of such techniques to operations in interior Greenland, where conditions are comparable to those in the Antarctic;
  5. Amplifying existing stores of knowledge of electromagnetic, geological, geographic, hydrographic, and meteorological propagation conditions in the area;
  6. Supplementary objectives of the Nanook expedition (a smaller equivalent conducted off eastern Greenland).


For his efforts, Byrd was honoured with a statue in Antarctica, and also received the US Medal of Honour…

Admiral Byrd (8)  Image result for admiral byrd grave


Interestingly, Admiral Byrd actually shared an account of his experience in Antarctica during a short NBC News interview that aired on June 24, 1955:



Before we dissect what was said in the interview above, please note the following written about Admiral Byrd – taken from Masonic Americana, 1976, pages 201-203 The Admirable Admiral

  • Raised in Federal Lodge No.1, Washington, D.C., in 1921; he later affiliated with Kane Lodge No. 454, New York City.
  • He was also a member of National Sojourners Chapter No.3 at Washington.
  • Byrd dropped Masonic flags over both poles during his flights.
  • Sixty of the 82 members of his Antarctic expedition of 1933-1935 were Freemasons.
  • They established First Antarctic Lodge No. 777 of New Zealand in 1935.


Admiral Byrd (4)



Image result for admiral byrd freemason


Below is an interesting picture of Admiral Byrd with his interviewer Dave Garroway in the NBC News studio where the interview above took place.

… Notice that there is curiously an Azimunthal Equidistant (Flat Earth) map on the studio wall behind them.


Image result for june 24 1955 admiral byrd Image result for june 24 1955 admiral byrd


Now then, in the interview Byrd said the following:

Strangely enough, there is an area left in the world today – an area as big as the United States, that’s never been seen by a human being.

It’s by far the most valuable and important place in the world for science…

He went on to outline that

It’s an untouched reservoir of natural resources…

  • enough coal within 180 miles… enough to supply the world
  • minerals, oil..
  • probably uranium…

He continued by saying that

Many nations – including Russia, Australia, Britain, Chile, and Argentina, are looking into Antarctica… 

Antarctica is the most peaceful place in the world, but it won’t be for long due to intense interest”… (i.e. interest in its resources and military importance).

He also outlined what conditions were like in Antarctica:

The south pole is surrounded by a plateau 10,000 feet high… the antarctic peninsula is surrounded by a “belt of ice” that is at least 1,200 miles thick… the south is a plateau in some place 14,000ft up.. its a little bit chilly up there…


Now remembering that he is a freemason and that he appeared in the mainstream media on national television, there must have been a very calculated reason for his appearance…

Furthermore, if you watch the interview carefully, you can see him frequently glancing nervously down at his notes as well as off camera, as if he’s following a script and following instructions – rather than speaking freely.

Whatever the case, if we as the public take his story at face-value – in particular the parts about the vast abundance of natural resources – then it would be incredulous that the profit-hungry oil & gas tycoons who basically run the government haven’t ventured over to Antarctica to dig it up…

Remember, these are the same people who have no problems destroying rainforests and pristine landscapes…

Image result for coal mine Image result for deforestation

… whilst making countless species of flora and fauna extinct and displacing countless local tribes in the process…

… but all of a sudden they are unable to lobby their corrupt friends in Washington DC to allow them to explore “an untouched reservoir of natural resources”?…

… A reservoir that just happens to be full of “enough coal, oil, and gas to supply the whole world“… and where there are no trees, no rainforests, endangered species, tribes, etc…

… all for the sake of a bit of “scientific research” about ice and a few penguins?


Image result for yeah right meme


This story doesn’t add up…


They tell us that this is a continent that has

  • no native inhabitants;
  • a minimal amount of wildlife; and
  • is FULL of natural resources…

…and our profit-driven world leaders aren’t rushing over there to dig its resources up?!

Clearly something’s up over there…




Now, I’m sure you’re asking yourself the obvious question…


… Why doesn’t somebody just sail over to Antarctica and check it out?…









Well, firstly, you probably need a very big (and expensive boat)…


… and secondly, (un)conveniently enough there just happens to be a little military treaty that keeps it “protected”……



Image result for oh come on gif

1959 Antarctic Treaty

The Antarctic Treaty and related agreements, collectively known as the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), regulate international relations with respect to Antarctica, Earth’s only continent without a native human population.

The treaty, [signed in 1959 and] entering into force in 1961 and having 53 parties as of 2016, sets aside Antarctica as “a scientific preserve”, establishes freedom of scientific investigation and bans military activity on that continent. The treaty was the first arms control agreement established during the Cold War.


First of all, notice the suspect timing of the Treaty… do you think the Treaty had anything to do with what Admiral Byrd and the US Navy was up to in Antarctica (i.e. building bases, etc..)


Image result for admiral byrd freemason


Secondly, notice from the passage quoted above that

The [Antarctic] treaty was the first arms control agreement established during the Cold War.”…


Funny how the United States and Soviet Union were Cold War enemies from 1947 until 1991 and couldn’t agree about anything in the 1950’s….


… except for a treaty to “protect” a big block of ice!





Now, how do you think they enforce that ban and “protect” the “scientific preserve” ?


Image result for wondering








Here’s a hint:





“Oh but they would have to patrol such vast areas of ocean, so that would be impossible…”

Image result for hmm








Well actually, let’s think logically here…


There are really only 3 areas in the world from which Antarctica is realistically accessible (as shown in the map below)….

… and to sail in other regions would be extremely dangerous due to high seas on the open ocean.

Furthermore, whatever route you try to get there by, you would also need a rather large (and expensive) ship, along with a competent crew of experienced sailors – neither of which the vast majority of people have access to.

… And even if you did have a huge boat and some crazy friends, you’d still have to navigate past sophisticated radar systems that have made it very easy for the Navy to track large areas of ocean.

patrol zones.jpg Image result for radar


Amazingly, one adventurous guy and his friends actually did manage to sail to Antarctica recently to explore on their own… as you can see in this video.

… But as it happens they faced the full wrath of various Navy’s and court systems for daring to contravene the ridiculous Antarctic Treaty regulations (which you will see outlined a bit further down)…








Antarctic Treaty Regulations


The following passages are taken from the US State Department regulations concerning Antarctica.

Note that you don’t need to read all the details, just skim through the parts I’ve highlighted for you in yellow if you wish 🙂



In other words, no unauthorized use of any equipment necessary to explore Antarctica…

Do you think an independent explorer could realistically explore Antarctica without motorized equipment?







If it is so remote, inhospitable, and dangerous, why do they need a military treaty to keep people out? Do they really think that many people would want to go there to make it worth the effort to “protect” it?

… After all, it’s not like people are lining up to visit Siberia or the Sahara desert, but they don’t have any international treaties protecting those remote areas…





“Devoted to peace”… Yeah right!




As pertains to “adverse impacts on the environment”, let’s use our heads here…


The area of Antarctica is said to be 14 million km²…

antarctica area.JPG


With that in mind, don’t you think it’s rather absurd for our governments to say “nope, nobody can go below the 60° south latitude without our permission”…?

I mean, imagine if they put the same restrictions on travelling to South America or Australia, in order to “protect the environment” in the name of “scientific research”!


As it happens, Antarctica saw only around 10,000 visitors per year until a recent peak up to 40,000, as per IAATO:


Image result for iaato logo   Image result for antarctic tourism map


For comparison, that is 3,460,000 less tourists per year than the number of people visiting the Empire State Building…


… and 16,000 people less than the entire population of Greenland… which is (said to be) 7 times smaller than Antarctica…



… yet you won’t find any military treaties involving 53 countries to protect polar pears in Greenland, do you?


Image result for polar bear nope


Do you really think 40,000 people per year can do so much “environmental damage” that it warrants having such a stringent international military treaty involving 53 countries to protect a continent twice the size of Australia?!


Image result for nope gif



So basically, unless you go through authorized agencies on your tourist visit, you’re unlikely to reach your intended destination…


Image result for penguin dive gif




Needless to say, environmental impact statements are very complicated and require substantial resources…




Your purpose has to be disclosed and approved…

… So again, do you really think any independent exploration would be allowed (with the fate of Jarle Andehøy’s crew in mind…)?



Additionally, the Handbook of the Antarctic Treaty System outlines numerous “Specially Protected Areas” in Antarctica that are ENTIRELY off limits to everyone…




As such, you will never be allowed to access huge swaths of land, even with a permit.


Effectively, tourists are only permitted to see is a small corner of one of Antarctica’s peninsula’s…


Image result for antarctica tourism map  Image result for antarctic tourism map


Most tourists who go there are also basically just there to snap some pics of the oh-so-cute penguins…

Image result for penguin tourist Image result for penguin tourist


… and they don’t have a clue about the proverbial elephant in the room…



Do you think a genuine trecker would ever be allowed to venture off the designated path… to somewhere where they might actually find something interesting?




The funniest part, is that the island tourists often go to is even called “Deception Island“.

… You can’t make this up!

Image result for antarctica tourism map


Now, let’s take a look at what the Antarctic Treaty itself says…


Handbook of the Antarctic Treaty System

Chapter 2: The Antarctic Treaty System: Introduction




Antarctica is to be used for peace… but “military personnel or equipment” and having the US Navy build military bases there is apparently ok…


Image result for penguin army



Exchange of information/personnel under U.N. supervision…

… This sounds a lot like some of the plans about “sustainable cooperation” outlined in Agenda 2030… that we briefly discussed in Energy Weapons: Tesla’s Suppressed Technologies.



No claims of sovereignty allowed by any government… which is right in line with the borderless “global neighbourhood” NWO utopia we’re moving towards…



In other words, nobody is allowed to access any land, ice, or water south of 60 degrees without the permission of the authorities…




In other words, all countries will follow the same regulations as those outlined here, to discourage any activities contrary to the Antarctic Treaty One World Government…


Isn’t it amazing how with so many wars and crises happening around the world, with many treaties being re-negotiated and amended, that this Treaty has remained in tact and largely unchanged for almost 60 many years?!


Furthermore, isn’t it interesting how there are no bases within the 80° south latitude…


Map of all the Antarctic research stations


Image result for gee i wonder


Maybe it has something to do with the fact that there is no south pole below the 80° south latitude…

Image result for flat earth map


Now, in order to propagate the myth that an area of land twice the size of Australia and visited by a mere 40,000 people per year is under environmental threat and needs to continue to be severely restricted, the authorities post pictures like those below in the media…

… and as you saw in The Greatest Liars of All Time, it’s not particularly hard to set up a fake scene.

The picture below is taken from an article titled “Human impacts in Antarctica: what are we doing?”, published on the website of the Australian Antarctic Division within the Australian governments’ Department of the Environment and Energy.

Image result for antarctic tourism impacts Image result for antarctic tourism impacts

Note that at the time of that article, in 2001, there were only 10,000 visitors per year to Antarctica…

… And yet, they still post pictures like the one’s above as if they’re supposed to be representative of a land mass almost the size of South America!

Think for a second…

Could a remote continent roughly the size of South America – with less than 40,000 people visiting it per year, really warrant the sort of total lock-down the Treaty above outlines?





…. As if they really care about a bunch of pengiuns!



Image result for penguins gif



As it happens, you’ve probably seen plenty of penguins and Antarctica in cartoons…

Image result for penguins of madagascar antarctica


… and there’s plenty of other interesting things to be found on television if you look closely…


Flat Earth Hidden in Plane Sight


You should have noticed by now that the truth is always hidden in plain sight (!!!), and Antarctica is no different…











images (1)




Sorry if I just ruined Game of Thrones for you…











… But not really 😀




Looking at cartoons again, do you think that it’s a coincidence that this “Pizza Planet” truck has appeared in every single Pixar movie?


Image result for pizza planet truck in pixar movies


The Flat Earth appears in countless Hollywood movies as well, an example of which is seen here:


Image result for flat earth in movies


This 6min video will show you many more examples of Flat Earth symbolism in Hollywood movies…


You can find TONS more Flat Earth symbolism in Hollywood movies in the videos linked below…

Watching all these can be a rather eye-opening experience…



Flat Earth & dome symbolism can be seen in plain site on the internet too…



Amazingly, as shown clearly in as this 2min video, the Encyclopedia Americana published in 1958 (the year before the Antarctic Treaty was signed) actually refers to the dome in a passage about Antarctica…

Image result for encyclopedia americana 1958

The passage very clearly states that the dome is 13,000ft high at latitude 80° S, longitude 90° E…




Image result for oopsie meme


The Flat Earth also features frequently on the news… in this case on “Global News”….. what a joke!




… and in other news…


Here’s something else related to television that might be of interest…

Just two years after Admiral Byrd appeared on TV to talk about Antarctica, the US government kicked its “education” program up a notch with the National Defense Education Act of 1958


Public TV law.JPG

Public TV.JPG



Clearly, there has long been a clear plan in place for how to “educate” the masses with “effective techniques and methods”…


And that brings us to our final topic for today, which will see this post come full circle (pun intended)…

Disinformation Programmes

First, a look at the meaning of the word “Government”…



Keep what you learned about magnetism, energy, and the climate change hoax in Energy Weapons: Tesla’s Suppressed Technologies in mind when you watch the video below.

While watching, also ask yourself this:

Why would Obama and John Kerry repeatedly bring up the Flat Earth in their speeches if there wasn’t something to it? It seems rather odd as you will see…



So why bring up the Flat Earth Society repeatedly?

Well, there are three main reasons:

  1. Ridicule;
  2. To vilify “Flat Earthers” (aka “climate change deniers“) among the general public – notice people like Bill Nye suggesting that we should imprison climate deniers… so basically anyone who doesn’t bow down to authority; and
  3. Strategically.


Let me elaborate on point 3:

After watching these speeches, if anyone is mildly curious about the subject, they will most likely google “flat earth society” and be led to the Flat Earth Society website


Image result for taiwan emergency landing flat earth


Now, this website is a perfect example of “controlled opposition“… as it is in fact full of wrongful information that is likely to quickly throw off anyone not curious enough to dig deeper…



It’s all a game of smoke and mirrors, but the truth, as you know by now, is hidden in plain sight…



Here’s the Flat Earth map in plain site again, this time in JFK’s situation room…



Speaking of JFK, listen to his famous “Secret Societies” speech, which contains plenty of clues about what’s going on here…




Image result for jfk official concealment



With regards to “official censorship and concealment”…


… here’s what William Casey, Director of the CIA, had to say in 1981:








Now, with those two quotes in mind, watch this (4 min) eye-opening video:








Hollywood has been rubbing the globe in your face for a long time too…



At this stage, you might find it of great interest to watch this short interview featuring KGB agent talking about mind control and social conditioning…








Image result for rockefeller nation of workers



Here’s a rather fitting illustration, again taken from the official music video of Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2):


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall, Part Two (Official Music Video)



Image result for another brick in the wall cover


Let me remind you of the short (1min) movie clip you saw in An Introduction to Synchronicity, about how people have built their own prison…




Now – with André Gregory’s words in mind,…


…. my parting message to you today is this:




Image result for don't be another brick in the wall






To be continued




21. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2)

Before you read any further here, it is highly recommended that you read the posts listed below first, in order to have a full grasp of the subject matter that will be discussed in this post.

  • 16. The Torus and Ancient Cosmology – where a mathematical model of the Universe was derived using magnetism, nature, and mathematics (i.e. sacred geometry, vector equilibrium, and the golden mean/phi). The model matched the model of the cosmos shared by every ancient culture.
  • 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time – a study of many of NASA’s lies.
  • 18. Look Around, it will Astound You – where the expected curvature of the globe was calculated and compared to reality (to find that we see no curvature); and where perspective was discussed in depth.
  • 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around – where we analyzed the behaviour of the sun and moon.
  • 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby – where we scrutinized the spinning ball model of Earth provided to us by NASA and scientists.


Note that this post has been split in two to make it easier to navigate and read.

This page thus features Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2), and at the bottom of this page you can simply continue on to Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2/2).



To recap, in the last post – You Spin Me Right Round Baby, we took a look at the spinning ball called Earth…


Image result for throw earth gif



… and in effect,





Image result for spinning basketball gif






… became this:



Image result for squashed basketball










Image result for oh i see meme










Image result for patrick bateman ooh face




In the last post we also decoded a substantial amount of symbolism found in the music video of the song You Spin Me Right Round (Like a Record) by Dead or Alive



… and we’re going to continue on the music theme in this post, which as you shall see will tie in with the main topic of the post… The Ice Wall.



… And with that said, let’s slide on over to my CD collection… 🙂



Image result for penguin gif





Image result for do you like huey lewis and the news gif



Do you like Pink Floyd?



Their early work was a little “New Wave” for my taste, but when Dark Side of the Moon came out in 1973 I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.


A prism refracting white light into a rainbow on a black background


The whole album has a clear crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism, that really gives the songs a big boost.


Roger Waters has been compared to Elvis Costello, but I think Roger has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humour.


In 1979, Pink Floyd released this…


Image result for nod head gif


…., The Wall, one of their most accomplished albums…


Image result for the wall pink floyd


I think their undisputed masterpiece is Another Brick in the Wall…


Image result for another brick in the wall cover


… a song so catchy, most people probably don’t listen to the lyrics…



Image result for patrick bateman dancing gif



.. but they should, because it’s not just about the pleasures of conformity, and the importance of trends, it’s also a personal statement about the band itself.






Image result for huey lewis axe












The video above does a great job of presenting much of the occult (i.e. hidden) meanings of Pink Floyd’s work, so I won’t cover everything about Pink Floyd below, but we will build further on top of what was said in the video.


You may recall from Obelisks and City Plans that the One World Freedom Tower is designed in such a way as to look like a pyramid with a capstone from street-level…


Main Mashup   dollar2


… This peculiar appearance is due to its architectural structure, which is that of an anti-prism:




Now, notice the symbolic album cover to Pink Floyd’s album, Dark Side of the Moon:


A prism refracting white light into a rainbow on a black background

We will cover the importance of the anti-prism/prism in a later post, but for now just realize that the symbol placed on the album cover is very significant.



Pink Floyd Synchronicity

Those who have read An Introduction to Synchronicity will perhaps see some significance in the fact that The Wall was released on November 30th, 1979…. or 11/30… as it contains the number 13, as well as 33 (11×3).

Pink Floyd’s other record-selling album Dark Side of the Moon was released on March 1st, which also encodes 13 (1/3).

Note that these two albums are both in the top 20 most sold albums in history:

  • Dark Side of the Moon – sold 45 million copies (3rd highest)
  • The Wall – sold 30 million copies (20th highest).


Another one of Pink Floyd’s popular albums – A Saucerful of Secrets – pictured below, was released on June 29th, 1968… which is the 181st day of the year in the 1968 leap year, or 11×8=88 – another number that we’ve seen previously (in Leylines: Part 2), notably in the 88.88° alignment between obelisks and domes at the Vatican, Washington DC, and between Stonehenge and Easter Island (which has 888 statues), to name a few.

Image result for saucerful of secrets

The number 8 (and owls, as discussed in posts 5 and 6) are in fact related to the theme of time (and death) as we will discuss further in a future post…


As it happens, time is also a theme in many of Pink Floyd’s songs, exemplified by the song titled Time on the album Dark Side of the Moon, as well as by the lyrics to the song The Great Gig in the Sky (among numerous other examples):

And I am not frightened of dying, any time will do, I don’t mind.
Why should I be frightened of dying?
There’s no reason for it, you’ve gotta go sometime.
If you can hear this whispering you are dying.
I never said I was frightened of dying.


As shown in the video above, two of the most blatant themes in Pink Floyd’s work are their references to Ice and Walls, along with numerous cryptic references about Flat Earth.


Ice Wall References

Pink Floyd’s album The Wall features interesting album cover artwork, in the form of an endless white wall…


Image result for the wall pink floyd


The album The Wall also includes songs titled “Outside the Wall“, and “The Thin Ice“, so there are numerous clear references to ice as well as walls in the album.

Furthermore, a clip of a circular white wall appears twice in the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2):


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall, Part Two (Official Music Video)

One of Pink Floyd’s earliest albums – A Saucerful of Secrets (1968), contains many references to a Flat Earth plane, not least through the album title; along with many cryptic song titles like “Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun”, and “Let There Be More Light”.

The song Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun also features the lyrics “Witness the man who raved at the wall“… showing that walls was a prominent theme on multiple albums.

To point out the obvious, Dark Side of the Moon is also a clear reference to the fact that we never see the back side of the moon, as discussed in What Goes Around, Comes Around.

Dark Side of the Moon also has several other cryptically-titled songs, such as “The Great Gig in the Sky“, and “Eclipse“, as mentioned in the video above.


Now, check out the lyrics for “Wish You Were Here“, off the 1975 album by the same name:

So, so you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain.
Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail?
A smile from a veil?
Do you think you can tell?
Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts?
Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze?
Cold comfort for change?

NASA fakery for real pictures?
Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?

Ok, so I added one there myself (one that those who read The Greatest Liars of All Time will understand)… but the message here is that you cannot tell the difference between what is truth and what is fake, because you have been deceived… 

The lyrics continue…

How I wish, how I wish you were here.
We’re just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have we found?
The same old fears.
Wish you were here.


It should be pretty obvious what that lyrical inference is…


Image result for fishbowl upside down 681203_QFzgR9it


Needless to say, the “fishbowl” label matches the model of the universe that we discussed in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology and in What Goes Around, Comes Around


Image result for axis flat earth 




Now, putting aside fishbowls and domes, let’s take a look at the most famous Pink Floyd lyrics of all…


We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control



First, a look at “education”…


We don’t need no education




So, what is “instruction” then?…




In other words,


Education = The systematic receiving of direct orders


Here’s a fitting clip to illustrate what our “education” system is like, as seen in the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall, Part Two (Official Music Video)


Notice how there is no mention of the word “learning” in the very definition of “education”…


A rather apt description of our schools is as follows:


Image result for give me a nation of workers



Thus, children are shaped into compliant drones in school…


maxresdefault (1).jpg


…. and then they go on to follow orders the rest of their lives in the system built for them…



Image result for authority boss       Image result for authority boss





Image result for give me a nation of workers











This certainly gives extra meaning to the Pink Floyd song “Comfortably Numb”…



Image result for office drone



People have simply been taught – or rather, socially conditioned, to tacitly accept what they are told by their boss, their military officer, their politicians, or other authority figures as being the truth…

Image result for chain of command cartoon

If you think this is ridiculous, check out this 2min video about the famous Milgram experiments, which show the (literally) shocking extent to which most people will obey authority:


Most people will also follow social norms without question, no matter how ridiculous they are, as shown by this simple social experiment:


Authority figures in society – whether they are teachers, politicians, your boss, or scientists, are just puppets projecting “education” onto you…

In other words, these puppets give you direct orders that have been passed down to them to follow, as symbolized in the clip below, which is also from the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2):


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall, Part Two (Official Music Video)




With that in mind, here is one of the earliest “direct orders” our “education” system is feeding our children…


Image result for globe teacher


Any child will believe that the Earth is flat, until they are told otherwise on the very first day of school…




Image result for teach flat earthers meme



For those who want to learn more about the indoctrination of children with regards to the globe, I highly recommend the video below. It may be 30mins in length, but it will be well worth your time.



To summarize, I think most people would agree that Pink Floyd said it best as pertains to the education system…



Image result for hey teacher leave those kids alone




Now, let’s look at the second part of those famous Pink Floyd lyrics…


We don’t need no thought control


thought control.JPG



Restrict ideas” and “impose opinions” can rather aptly be applied to some of the pictures that you’ve no doubt seen in textbooks growing up…





Not surprisingly, these are literally the first images that pop into your head whenever you hear the words “flat earth”… despite the fact that they are completely false.


Allow me to take a moment to reiterate that definition for you:


Thought control:

The attempt to restrict ideas and impose opinions through censorship and the control of curricula in schools.


Pictures like those you’ve seen above are nothing more than mind control… as they steer people away from the truth and keep them from actually wanting to look into the subject more critically, because it’s ridiculous, right?! …





Of course, anyone who actually does see past the lies to find the truth is subsequently ridiculed by their friends and family who have seen these mind-numbing pictures of what “Flat Earth” supposedly looks like, and obviously “know better”…

It also convinces modern day “intellectuals” to believe that they are the most advanced civilization – because of course, our ancestors must have been primitive if they thought the world was flat… and this then keeps people from actually investigating any real history for themselves.


In essence, we all consider ourselves to be so advanced and well-educated…

… however, with the definition of “education” above in mind, considering oneself to be “well-educated” is nothing more than an admission that one has fully accepted and conformed to the direct orders given by an authority figure without question.


It follows – in the words of Stephen Hawking, that:


Image result for illusion of knowledge


With that in mind, it is no surprise then that so-called “intellectuals” – who have jumped through all the hoops and swallowed all the pills – are often those who have the hardest time accepting the truth.





Thus, the reaction from “educated” people to people who question authority is usually something like this…


Image result for lalalala meme               Image result for you're crazy



Image result for im right meme



Image result for oh you disagree meme



Nobody likes to hear “the truth” from anyone who isn’t an authority figure, because that’s not how we’ve been programmed in school…



Image result for political correctness





1 (1).jpg




“Political correctness” is thus a very useful tool for those seeking to control populations…








So then, if we’ve been told by our authorities that the Flat Earth looks like this…







… then I’m sure you’re wondering why nobody sails over “the edge”?…


Image result for flat earth edge



Image result for pirate argh









“The Edge”


The reason why we don’t fall off the “edge”…


… and (whilst we’re on the subject of “political correctness”…)… pardon me if I sound a bit like this guy…





… is because there is a thick ice wall around the entire Earth that holds all the ocean water in…





















… I’m saying that Antarctica actually encircles the Earth, and isn’t just another continent…





…. This is in fact exactly what Pink Floyd was alluding to with their album artwork and music video animation…


Image result for the wall pink floyd   Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall, Part Two (Official Music Video)










Now for a bit of history about Antarctica…


Charting Antarctica


Captain James Cook (1772-1775)

Captain James Cook was reportedly the first to cross the Antarctic Cirlce in 1772-1775.

Image result for captain james cook Image result for captain james cook ship

The second voyage of James Cook 1772–1775, commissioned by the British government with advice from the Royal Society, was designed to circumnavigate the globe as far south as possible to finally determine whether there was any great southern landmass, or Terra Australis.

On his first voyage, Cook had demonstrated by circumnavigating New Zealand that it was not attached to a larger landmass to the south, and he charted almost the entire eastern coastline of Australia, yet Terra Australis was believed to lie further south. 

On 17 January 1773, Resolution was the first ship to cross the Antarctic Circle which she crossed twice more on the voyage. The third crossing, on 3 February 1774, was to be the most southerly penetration, reaching latitude 71°10′ South at longitude 106°54′ West.

Cook undertook a series of vast sweeps across the Pacific, finally proving there was no Terra Australis by sailing over most of its predicted locations.


Below is an excerpt from Scientific American: Supplement Volume 48, which describes what Captain Cook encountered – based on his journals:



“In 1774 Captain Cook sailed down into the  unknown Antarctic regions, and after terrible hardships reached a spot where he saw a snow-white brightness in the clouds to the south, and  he knew he was near the ice fields.

Four hours later he was stopped by a great barreir in latitude 71° South, where the mountains of ice, rising one above the other, tier upon tier, into the distance, were lost in the clouds of the polar sky.

This coast of Victoria Land was a grand scene of glaciers launching their gigantic ends into the sea. From the coastline, where the walls of ice stood as sheer cliffs hundreds of feet high, the mountains inland ranged one over the other, culminating in the volcanic peaks 12,000ft high.”


The full text containing more juicy details can be found below…

… and don’t worry if you don’t have a magnifying glass, as you can find and enlarge this text here.




Captain James Clark Ross (1842) & The Mythical Magnetic South Pole

Image result for james clark ross Image result for james clark ross 1842

As mentioned in the Scientific American Supplement above, the ice wall was also charted in 1842 by Sir James Clark Ross – a British Naval Officer and polar explorer who was among the first to venture to Antarctica, in an attempt to determine the position of the South Magnetic Pole (or so they say…).


South Magnetic Pole

Incidentally, we know that the “South Magnetic Pole” is a complete myth, because if it actually existed a compass wouldn’t point towards the north in the southern hemisphere…

As it happens, compasses always point North, no matter where in the world you are…



Thus, a simple compass can single-handedly disprove the model given to us by “science”…

… because if the Earth was a ball with a magnetic field as we’re told…

Image result for earth magnetic field

… then

  • compasses in the south would point towards the “South magnetic pole” (as illustrated in orange below); and
  • only compasses in the northern hemisphere would point to the northern magnetic pole (as illustrated in yellow below):



What actually happens is that magnets point towards magnetic center on the flat plane…

14212822_10155286476063636_2330703944758127586_n      Image result for flat earth compass

… because that is the center of the magnetic torus field that you were introduced to in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology… Hence why we have the Northern lights… in the North.

There’s an obvious reason why you’ve never heard of or seen “The Southern Lights”… because they don’t exist as there’s no Southern magnetic pole!



What’s more, the location purported to be the “South Pole”, is actually referred to as the “Ceremonial South Pole” because it isn’t even at the “South pole”…



Why is that then?

… Because if the official story is supposed to hold up, a compass at the exact South (magnetic) pole would be spinning around and around rather than pointing North…

… and as the South magnetic pole doesn’t exist they HAVE to have a “ceremonial” pole at a location said to be different to the “actual” pole, in order to cover up that little secret.

Note also that “science” also tells us that the geographic south pole is different from the south magnetic pole… which is just another ridiculous imaginary concoction dreamed up to perpetuate the lie.



Anyways, back to Sir James Clark Ross – the British Naval Officer who explored Antarctica…


Upon confronting the massive vertical front of ice at Antarctica he remarked (in his journal):

“It was … an obstruction of such character as to leave no doubt in my mind as to our future proceedings, for we might as well sail through the cliffs of Dover as to penetrate such a mass.

It would be impossible to conceive a more solid-looking mass of ice; not the smallest appearance of any rent or fissure could we discover throughout its whole extent, and the intensely bright sky beyond it but too plainly indicated the great distance to which it reached southward.”

For reference, here are what the cliffs of Dover look like…

Image result for cliffs of dover Image result for cliffs of dover


Sir James Clark Ross and his expeditionary fleet sailed “around” the ice wall for months in “circumnavigation”. Between pit stops at the Cape of Good Hope and his polar expeditions, he spent the next several years of his life “circumnavigating” the southern coast vainly in search of a south sea passage to the other side. (Excerpt from here).

All we at present know is, that snow and hail, howling winds, and indescribable storms and hurricanes prevail; and that in every direction “human ingress is barred by unsealed escarpments of perpetual ice,” extending farther than eye or telescope can penetrate, and becoming lost in gloom and darkness.


Beyond the Ice Wall and Antarctic mountains is anyone’s guess. How far the ice extends; how it terminates; and what exists beyond it, are questions not answered by information in the public domain.


Other famous explorers of Antarctica in recent times include Ranulph Fiennes, as well as Ronald Falcon Scott and Roald Amundsen, so we’re going to take a quick look at them too.


Ranulph Fiennes (1992/1993)

Many naysayers like to point to the explorer Ranulph Fiennes, who according to Wikipedia:

… “undertook numerous expeditions and was the first person to visit both the North and South Poles by surface means and the first to completely cross Antarctica on foot.

Before believing that story, consider these four points:

  1. Ranulph Fiennes was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in 1993 for “human endeavour and for charitable services”.

You may recall from Templars Cross, Square and Compass, and The Night Owl, that OBE’s (on the left below) are in the shape of the Templars Cross… which happens to appear on many of the establishments highest awards and medals of honour…


Kings Royal Crown 




Needless to say, an OBE is nothing more than a title given to the Queen’s biggest liars and criminals… as exemplified by these two chaps…

Image result for queen paedophile meme

Image result for queen paedophile meme

This isn’t necessarily to say that Ranulph Fiennes likes children, but the fact that he’s been honoured by the Queen does suggest that he’s serving a greater purpose within freemasonic circles.

2. Fiennes’ 2013 mission (where he suffered frostbite) benefited Seeing is Believing, a charity that happens to have one eye as it’s logo…

 Resultado de imagem para seeing is believing logo   Image result for seeing is believing ship


… a clear reference to The Eye of Horus that you were introduced to in Links to the Ancients

Image result for eye of horusImage result for hollywood one eye


Incidentally, this charity also has strong ties to Liverpool FC, a club with an extremely occult history that we covered in Festivals of Fire and An Introduction to Synchronicity.

  Image result for seeing is believing lfc   Image result for seeing is believing lfc


3. As you’ve seen above, the way Captain James Cook and Captain James Clark Ross both described Antarctica would suggest that it would be impossible for anyone to single-handedly “completely cross Antarctica on foot”

  • where the mountains of ice, rising one above the other, tier upon tier, into the distance, were lost in the clouds of the polar sky
  • The desolate grandeur of that icy coast appalled the great navigator, and seeing no possibility of pushing to the pole over those impassable mountains, he contented himself with having gone further than anyone had ever been before, and, he thought as far as any man could go“. 
  • a grand scene of glaciers launching their gigantic ends into the sea.
  • where the walls of ice stood as sheer cliffs hundreds of feet high, the mountains inland ranged one over the other, culminating in the volcanic peaks 12,000ft high.”
  • we might as well sail through the cliffs of Dover as to penetrate such a mass.
  • It would be impossible to conceive a more solid-looking mass of ice;



4. According to BBC in 2013,

Sir Ranulph Fiennes has pulled out of an expedition across Antarctica during winter because of severe frostbite.

Image result for ranulph fiennes antarctica

The 68-year-old was injured after a fall while skiing during training at a base camp in Antarctica. He used his bare hands to fix a ski binding in temperatures around -30C.

Image result for ranulph fiennes hands Image result for ranulph fiennes hands

Does this really strike you as being a mistake an experienced explorer – one who is said to have climbed Mount Everest, single-handedly crossed Antarctica (on foot), and reached the North pole – would make?

Image result for skeptical








Clearly, there are many reasons to doubt Ranulph Fiennes’ Antarctica story.


Roald Amundsen & Ronald Falcon Scott (1911-1912)

The supposed routes to the South Pole taken by Scott (green) and Amundsen (red) in 1911–1912 are shown here:


 Map of a segment of Antarctica, identifying the polar marches of Scott and Amundsen.

I won’t go into much detail about their expeditions here, but what is interesting to note is that both Amundsen and Scott were freemasons…

… as is disclosed openly in The Official Journal of the United Grand Lodge of England, Freemasonry Today:




After all we have learned about freemasons thus far in this blog, this should be enough reason to question the legitimacy of those expeditions.



Now, let’s take a closer look at the paths taken by the explorers discussed above.



Here is a map of Captain James Cook’s three voyages, as mapped on a globular map:


Image result for james cook antarctica map


Captain James Cook’s route around Antarctica in 1772-1775 is said to have taken 3 years… as mapped onto a globe in this video.


Image result for captain cook antarctica 1773


Ferdinand Magellan was apparently the first person to have sailed “around the globe” in 1519-22… followed by Sir Francis Drake (1577-80)…

Image result for magellan flat earth

Notice below that portrayals of Magellan feature a globe and compass, just like Magellan’s other freemason friends… who you’ve seen previously in many previous posts here.

Image result for magellan freemason     Freemasons (1)

… and here is Sir Francis Drake, doing the customary masonic hand gesture that we discussed in Links to the Ancients, and Templars Cross, Square and Compass, and The Night Owl

Image result for francis drake freemason  


With that in mind, we can see clearly that these guys were in on the big lie perpetuated by the freemasons.


Now, allow me to point out that circumnavigating the world doesn’t mean that one has traveled around a ball…

Image result for circumnavigate globe


… it simply means that one has traveled around something…



… which in this case would be like going around in a circle on a dinner plate…

 Image result for flat earth sun diameter


Image result for sun movement flat earth


With that in mind, this is what Magellan’s path in 1519-1592 actually looked like:


Image result for magellan flat earth   


… and below is Captain James Cook’s journey in 1772-1775 as it would appear on a Flat Earth map:




It should be noted that navigators used to use a map like the one below, along with a sextant, to navigate… and they seemed to find their way around ok…

Interesting that there is no Antarctica on there either…

Image result for sun movement flat earth


To round off the first half of this post, let’s take a stab at calculating the circumference of the Earth…


Circumference Calculation

Without having seen the outer limit for ourselves, it’s impossible to make a firm assessment of what the circumference of the world is…

However, we can at least make an educated guess based on some observable data.


There are two simple ways to estimate the circumference.

1) Eratosthenes Method

Eratosthenes method allows us to approximate the diameter of the Earth to be 25,000 nautical miles, which is 28769.5 miles.

Using the formula for the circumference of a circle…

Image result for circumference formula

C= 2 π r = 28769.5 x π = 90,330 miles circumference.


2) Gleason’s Map

The Gleason’s New Standard Map of the World (HD version here) shows that 1 degree = 60 nautical miles at the equator (since at the equator the length of the line of latitude equals the length of the line of longitude).

A circle has 360°, so the circumference of the equator is 60NM x 360 = 21600NM.

As you’ll recall from What Goes Around, Comes Around, we can calculate the speed of the sun at the equator simply by dividing that distance by the time it takes for one full rotation, i.e. 24 hours…

So 21600NM / 24 = 900 NM… which is 1035.7 mph… which is identical to the speed NASA tells us that the Earth is spinning at!

Using the same formula as earlier…

Image result for circumference formula

…we know that a circle with circumference of 21,600 NM will have a radius of 3,439 NM, which is 3,957 miles…

… which again, is identical to the radius given to us by NASA for the radius of the globe…


…. NASA have apparently simply taken the truth and used it deceptively… to indicate the radius of the globe instead of what it actually is – the distance between the North pole and the equator…

radius fe.jpg



Now, by definition, the equator is the circle that is equidistant from the North Pole and South Pole.

Thus, we know that if the distance to the equator is 3,957 miles, then the distance to the outer edge will be double that… or 7,914 miles…

Now, again using this simple formula…

Image result for circumference formula


… we get C = 2  π r = 2 π x 7,914 = 49,728 miles, or ~80,000km.





As mentioned earlier, these are only estimations made using the information we have, and without going to Antarctica ourselves to check where the edge is it is impossible to know for sure how big the Flat Earth is.

That said, the results calculated using the Gleason’s map do match the numbers given to us by NASA (albeit for a deceptive model), as well as seeming reasonable with regard to the sun’s movement, so they are perhaps the likeliest correct answer given the information we have.


Whatever the case, distances in the Southern hemisphere are far too great to match a globe, as you shall see from Albatross Arithmetic below, which actually happens to be one of my personal Flat Earth proofs…


Albatross Arithmetic

Albatross are one of the only species to circumnavigate the Earth when they migrate… and as you will see in the video below the distance travelled by albatrosses corresponds to the Flat Earth map…


Albatross know! 🙂


Image result for albatross gif



That concludes Part 1, but I cordially invite you to swiftly row on over to Another Brick in the Wall Part 2/2 where our little boat adventure continues 🙂



Image result for rowing captain gif


20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby



In the last post (What Goes Around, Comes Around), we learned that:

  • the sun and moon are both only about 3,500 miles away;
  • they are both 32 nautical miles in diameter;
  • they only appear to change height due to perspective;
  • they travel in a circular path above the Flat Earth (FE) plane;
  • the sky is reflective and dome-shaped, as proven by the existence of rainbows and sundogs;
  • the 24 hour sun in both the Arctic and Antarctic are accounted for by the FE model;
  • the lunar phases are perfectly explained by the FE model;
  • eclipses make perfect sense on the FE model, but would be practically impossible on a globe;
  • the sun and moon are kept at the height they are at due to electromagnetic levitation;
  • the opposing energies of the sun and moon are responsible for the tides;
  • weather patterns (including temperature, wind, currents, etc) correspond perfectly to the movement of the sun and moon on a FE map.


That’s a pretty good case for the Flat Earth on its own…


… but in any case, let’s recap some of the other things we have learned thus far as well:


Kings Royal Crown 







 Freemasons (1)





  • We have mathematically proven that the Earth is a flat plane (in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology), using magnetism (as observed in nature) and mathematics – including vector equilibrium, sacred geometry, and the golden mean (phi):


Image result for axis flat earth



  • We also saw in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology that the flat Earth map appears on the UN logo, as well as in the logos of many other leading institutions:



  • We’ve seen (in The Greatest Liars of All Time) that all footage of space, the moon, and Earth provided to us by NASA is faked using a combination of CGI, photoshop, and many other means:


Image result for sun movement flat earth  


  • We calculated the expected curvature on a spherical globe (in Look Around, it will Astound You), and saw that there is in fact, no noticeable curve around us – neither visibly, nor by observing the behaviour of water (which always finds its level):


Image result for pythagoras flat earth curvature      Image result for water flat earth


… and finally,



Image result for parallel sun rays flat earth img_7419 (2)



Thus, the evidence for the Flat Earth is starting to stack up rather quickly…





… but you’ll be happy to know that there’s still plenty left for us to pick apart! 🙂




Image result for oh boy meme










In this post, we’re going to add to that mounting pile of evidence by addressing the magical spinning ball.


Image result for spin gif


First, some words of wisdom to get you in the right frame of mind…





On that note, here’s hoping that what you learned in The Greatest Liars of All Time will help you keep an open mind in this post…



We begin, by taking a look at the ball found in the top-left corner in the picture above – the globe Earth…



The Spinning Ball


We are told by science that the Earth spins at 1040 mph…


earth spin


Image result for throw earth gif


… while travelling around the Sun at 30km/s…  (66,6000 mph)…

speed of earth


Image result for solar system gif


… which itself orbits the Galaxy at 450,000 mph…


sun speed



Image result for solar system gif Image result for earth movement gif


… which spins at 515,000 mph…



Image result for galaxy spin gif



… which moves at an astounding 1.3 million mph in a random direction through the vacuum of the Universe…


Image result for galaxy moving gif


… which is expanding at H0 = 67.15 ± 1.2 (km/s)/Mpc…

Image result for what even is that






Image result for universe gif

Image result for expansion of universe


… and which gets faster in its acceleration as it gets bigger.


Image result for expansion of universe



Are you confused yet?



Image result for spinning eyes gif




Image result for huh gif




Want to know why you’re confused?


















Image result for drum roll gif







Image result for pile gif





Image result for thats good gif










Image result for fist bump gif the office




Next question…




Do you feel that?





Image result for uh no meme












Image result for obviously









Image result for looking around gif










Image result for um no meme










Image result for me neither

















download (4)



Is it:


  1. because the Earth is so big relative to us that we can’t feel it?



Image result for nodding pointing gif







… or is it


2. because the Earth isn’t actually moving?


Image result for you for real gif









Image result for nodding pointing gif








Wrong answer, Number 2!



Image result for number 2 gif



Another question – but first some (real) science to give you some background…


If the Earth is a ball spinning about the axis that connects its poles,

… then the speed of rotation would be fastest at the equator and slowest at places north and south of the equator, and a whopping 0 km/h at the poles…

Image result for earth spin speed

This is due to centripetal force…

Image result for centripetal force


The formula for centripetal force (F) is given by

Image result for centripetal force equation

… where

  • F is the force;
  • m is the mass of the object;
  • v is the angular velocity*; and
  • r is the radius.

*angular velocity means that it is the tangential velocity (as shown below), not the radial velocity (it is labelled slightly wrong in the diagram above):

Image result for centripetal force

Multiplying both sides of the equation above by r, the formula above can also be written as

F r = m v²

Thus, we see that the radius is proportional to the velocity squared…

r ∝ v²

… Meaning that, the further one is from the central axis, the greater the speed will be (much greater in fact, because the velocity is squared).


Now then, looking at the diagram below, you will notice that as you move away from the equator (towards the North or South), the distance away from the central axis (i.e. the radius of the circle) would decrease.

Therefore, the further away you are from the equator (north or south), the slower you spin…

Image result for earth spin speed

As you can see above, the speed at the equator is given as 1,650 km/h (or 1,040mph).

As your distance away from the axis (your radius) at the North pole is zero, your spinning speed would be 0 km/h at the pole.

Thus, if you traveled from the equator to the North pole, the speed that you are spinning at would change by 1,650 km/h.

That is, you would go from spinning at 1,650 km/h, to spinning at 0 km/h,… (or 1,040 mph to 0 mph).


Another example:

If you flew from Nairobi, Kenya (which is located on the equator) to Stockholm, Sweden, the speed at which you spin around the globe would change by about 800 km/h


To put that in perspective,


  • 12 km/h     Image result for runner
  •  30 km/h      Image result for bicycle
  • 150 km/h     Image result for car clipart
  • 300 km/h    453047157
  • 900 km/h      Image result for air plane clip art black and white
  • 2,200 km/h       fighter-clipart-359FDDC4-7586-46F4-B2D5-0DAE342A409F


This means that the difference between being on the North pole, and being somewhere on the equator, is roughly equivalent to the difference between standing still (0 km/h), and travelling in a fighter jet going at 1,650 km/h

… and the difference between being in Nairobi, Kenya, and being in Stockholm, Sweden, is roughly equivalent to the difference between standing still, and travelling on an airliner at 800 km/h


images (4)







The question I was going to ask (before all this scientific stuff)…

… is this:


Have you ever felt any change in your speed when moving from north to south (or south to north)?

…(let alone a change of 100’s of mph)…




Image result for umm no gif









“oh but if the change is gradual you won’t feel a difference”



















Here’s another fun fact:


Image result for spin flat earth


As you can see below, the speed of sound is given as 768 mph…

speed of sound

Now, the Doppler Effect – which you already encountered in Purple Haze: up in my brain… tells us that sound waves will be compressed in the direction of motion…

… This is why you can hear the sound of a police siren getting louder as it moves towards you, and quieter as it moves away from you:


Image result for doppler effect


With the Doppler effect in mind, and considering that the Earth is spinning towards the East at 1040mph – which is considerably greater than the 768mph speed of sound…

… that means that if we say something towards the West (against the direction that the Earth in spinning)… then nobody will be able to hear anything, because the sound will have traveled in the other direction (towards the East) already!








Image result for can you hear me








Image result for crickets gif









By contrast, if you spoke to the East (i.e. the direction the Earth is spinning), the sound would come at the person listening so fast it would be both extremely loud and incomprehensible.




Here are two short videos explaining this in a little bit more detail:




So with that in mind, if your mother-in-law is visiting, or if your wife is nagging you…


Image result for monkey pushing laptop gif Image result for nagging gif


…. all you have to do, is make sure they’re facing West and you won’t have to listen to them!


Image result for man headphones gif




Image result for thats good gif











Image result for oh hell no










Image result for thats sexist gif














Image result for on the internet gif





Image result for nagging gif










Image result for bill murray golf



Image result for joke meme



Anywaaaays, to get back on topic…










That’s a lot of common sense!




Image result for common sense














Shall you tell him or shall I?



Image result for wait for it gif



Anyways, lets take a look at some more actual common sense…


Are you ready?



Image result for ready? gif







Image result for ready gif









Great, lets dive right in then!






Let’s first take a look at flights on a spinning ball, because…



Image result for top gun gif



Flights on the Spinning Ball

For an introduction on why flights are impossible on the spinning ball, please watch this quick 2 min video. Note that the link appears broken but it works fine (or did when I last checked!)



To build on what was said in the video above,


Image result for spin flat earth


In other words, without correcting its course downwards, a pilot would fly his plane straight off the ball, like illustrated here by the red line:




In order to maintain a steady altitude and not fly straight off the ball and into space, an airliner traveling at 800 km/h would have to dip its nose and descend by 850m… per minute!




Image result for panic airplane





Image result for sweating airplane gif





Image result for panic airplane








Image result for danger zone meme


Now, if we were on a spinning ball, it would be impossible for planes to land on the ground like they do, unless the Earth was not moving.

Allow me to illustrate:



If the Earth is spinning to the East (at 1,040mph), and a plane is moving towards a runway in a Northwestern direction (with a landing speed of a Boeing 777 is around 160mph)…

landing 4

… then it would be impossible for the plane to land, as the Earth would spin out from under it (remember, the Earth is moving at 1000mph, and the plane at an angle to it at 160mph), so the plane would simply crash sideways off the runway immediately after touching down!

landing 6


landing 7



Image result for sweating airplane gif



Image result for talk to me goose gif








Image result for top gun meme


In other words:

landing 3


Furthermore, as outlined in the video above, if the Earth was spinning the distance flown between two points in opposite directions could never be the same…

flight 1


Image result for flat earth sun diameter


In fact, a plane flying at 800mph towards the East, would actually be flying backwards, as the Earth below it would be spinning at 1000mph in the same direction… so its target destination would be moving away from it.

In other words, relative to the ground, the airplanes speed would be 240mph, backwards… just like the speed of sound you saw earlier!




Thus, a flight going East, would fly backwards, and a flight flying West would get to its destination super quick as the destination would move towards the plane.


download (1)


For a good explanation on flights relative to the Earth spin, watch this video:



The graphics below illustrate why airplanes can’t physically take-off on a spinning ball.

For example, any plane taking off towards the West would have to overcome a 1,040mph headwind:








Here’s another useful visual for explaining the huge effects of drag on an object in the air:






There are other proofs related to flights showing that the Earth cannot be a spinning ball, such as the omni-directional radio:



Gyroscope’s also offer us an obvious proof:


Image result for gyroscope


In essence, the reason why Gyroscopes prove that we do not live on a spinning ball is illustrated below. A gyroscope simply doesn’t behave as we would expect if we were on a ball.






Below is an 11 min video that goes into a lot of detail about why gyroscopes can prove that the Earth is flat.

As its a rather complex explanation I’m going to let the video do most of the talking on this occasion, and only briefly cover the most obvious point below.


Pilots use gyroscopes to ensure that they are level with the ground when coming in for a landing…

Image result for gyroscope cockpit


Now, think about this for a second…

How can a gyroscope find its level, if we are on a ball?


Image result for curved earth


The answer is that it can’t, because a curved surface is never level!




Image result for he's right you know meme








Aircraft trimming is further evidence that we do not live on a spinning ball, as outlined by this 3min video:



So how could so many pilots be deceived?








Pilots have learned the same pseudoscience as everyone else, and thinking themselves to be intellectual and well-educated they probably never thought to question the strong-held beliefs that they’ve been told are true their whole lives…





Image result for top gun meme




Image result for top gun gif



Image result for boom gif








Anyways, we’re now gonna move on from planes…



… because quite frankly,





snakes meme final





Image result for top gun gif







Now then, the video above (i.e. the one titled The Earth is Not Moving) shows you how we would experience the atmosphere if the Earth was spinning, so I will cover the basics of that here.


The Atmosphere on a Spinning Ball

As you’ve seen above, if the Earth is spinning at 1,040 mph, it would be impossible for planes to land.


It would also mean that hot air balloons and helicopters should just be able to fly straight up, and then hover for a while until the location then wanted to get to appeared below them!




























Taking this a step further, if the ground was spinning at a constant velocity of 1,040 mph, that would mean that there would be a constant wind outside of 1,040 mph


To put that in perspective, a category four hurricane (the strongest type) typically reaches speeds of up to 150 mph



If 150 mph winds can do this…


Image result for hurricane Image result for hurricane Image result for tornado


Image result for wind gif


… then you better hold onto your hat next time you go outside into the 1,040 mph winds!


Image result for hat blown off gif




As such, we know that the Earth doesn’t spin relative to the atmosphere, otherwise if you put your head out of your bedroom window it would get torn off at 1040 mph!


Image result for wind gif




“Oh but the atmosphere moves with the spin of the Earth!”

“Bet you can’t explain that!”

Image result for explain that gif









Image result for explain that gif


Logical, but there are two big problems with that reasoning.



As explained in the video above (i.e. the one called The Earth Is Not Moving), it would not be possible for the air to be moving with the Earth, because it would not be moving in a straight line…

… Air higher up would have to travel faster…

Image result for earth spin falling off


This is because of centripetal force which you learned about above…


Image result for centripetal force



As you know the radius is proportional to the velocity squared…

r ∝ v²

Now, anything that is higher up in the sky has a greater radius (as measured from the center of the globe), so the higher up in the sky you are, the higher the velocity will be…

By the way, we also saw this behaviour with the sun and moon in What Goes Around, Comes Around, as the sun travels faster further out and slower further in while circling in its annual path – due to covering a greater distance in the same amount of time…


In the same way, air that is further up in the sky needs to travel further than air that is lower down.

Thus, fireworks, rain, and clouds (and anything else we see in the sky), would not behave anything like they do, as the drops/clouds/fireworks higher up in the sky would be moving faster than those below, so what we would see would be nothing like what we actually observe in the sky.

air 2


To give you a simple example, a cloud above our heads would never be able to be still in the sky in the absence of wind… because each “layer” would be moving at a slightly different speed…

Image result for cloud


Essentially, clouds higher up would always be travelling faster than clouds lower down…

… But of course, that is not what we see, as clouds generally tend to move uniformly at the same speed regardless of their height.

Image result for horizon clouds Image result for clouds horizon gif



Another reason why the atmosphere moving with the Earth wouldn’t work, is that exiting and entering space would be utterly impossible.

Consider this:

Science tells us that space begins at a height of about 100 km



If the Earth is spinning at 1,040 mph at ground level on the equator – at a radius of just 6,371 km…

That means that, at a height of 100km the atmosphere would be spinning at a speed even greater than 1,040 mph… (it would be greater because you are 100km above the ground, so your radius is bigger).

So with that in mind…. what do you think would happen when a space shuttle flies out of the atmosphere and into the vacuum of space (which as a vacuum, would have a speed of 0 mph)?…




I’ll give you a clue:






Image result for tornado gif



Many people like to claim that a ball being thrown into the air in a moving car and subsequently not hitting the back windshield is “proof” that the Earth is a spinning ball, but as this video eloquently outlines, that is most certainly not the case:





To summarize, if the Earth is spinning,

Either you have



  • The Earth spinning without the atmosphere – in which case you have 1,040 mph winds that tear your head off if you go outside…


… or…


  • The atmosphere moves with the ground – in which case the clouds you see outside would appear totally differently, and spaceships entering the vacuum of space would be torn to shreds due to the speed difference with space (of much greater than 1,000 mph).





Now, with all that in mind, ask yourself…


Do you believe the Earth spins because of anything you have experienced or seen for yourself,…

… or do you believe it spins because you have been told that it spins, and been bombarded with that message constantly on TV your whole life?




Image result for logo globe bbc Image result for cnn globeImage result for universal pictures logo




Image result for you have been brainwashed




Image result for you have been brainwashed



Let’s move on to another “proof” our “experts” tell us about…



“Coriolis Effect”


It is claimed by scientists that bullets, hurricanes, and other flying objects will swerve due to what is called the “Coriolis Effect”…




Image result for coriolis effect       Image result for coriolis effect


So let me get this straight,

The Coriolis effect occurs, because the Earth spins and the atmosphere is affected by the spin…

This is all great, except for the fact that it overlooks the first point we made above:

… That if the Earth was in fact spinning separate from the atmosphere, the wind speed on the surface of Earth would be so fast and violent (1,040mph) that nothing could exist on the Earth’s surface…




Image result for duh gif



Nonetheless, let’s briefly consider it, just so we can put it out of its misery…



Image result for put out of its misery



Now, the main factors for snipers to take into account in long-range shots are

  1. distance to target;
  2. humidity;
  3. height from the target; and
  4. wind variation…

… and as it happens, snipers never actually adjust for this mythical Coriolis Effect… because if they did, they’d be shooting in completely the wrong direction, as these simple calculations show:














As you can see, the Coriolis Effect is clearly a load of…


Image result for nonsense stamp


Here is a short 4 min video on the Coriolis Effect which also rubbishes the idea that toilets in the northern and southern hemisphere flush in different directions:



As discussed in the video above, contrary to popular belief water does not spin in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemisphere’s.


And on that note, let’s take a look at water as it pertains to a spinning ball…



Be forewarned:



Image result for common sense




Water on a Spinning Ball

The USGS states that about 71% of Earth is covered by water, with 96.5% of its water in the oceans. The total volume held by oceans, seas, and bays is estimated to be 321,000,000 cubic miles*…

 *to put that in perspective, this page gives a good comparison for how much water fits into one cubic mile.



There is also plenty more water in bodies like river, lakes, (along with water in vapour, icecaps, glaciers etc)…


Image result for thats alot of water



Basically, there is a whole lot of water floating around on this ball…





Beyond the obvious deduction that water never actually curves, but always finds its level – as discussed in Look Around, It Will Astound You)…


Image result for water flat earth


… the photo below should be enough to show you what is wrong with the spinning globe…



In fact, water never sticks to any ball, regardless if its spinning or not…


Not on a golf ball…


Image result for water drop ball



… Not on a football (soccer) ball…



Image result for water football




… Not on a cricket ball…



Image result for cricket ball water




… Not on a tennis ball…



Image result for wet tennis ball




… Not on a bowling ball…



Image result for bowling ball water




… Not on a water fountain ball…



Image result for bowling ball water




… Not on a ping pong ball…



Image result for ping pong ball water




… Not on a basketball…



Image result for basketball water




… Not on a baseball…



Image result for baseball water on




… Not on a snooker ball…



Image result for snooker ball water




… Not on a volleyball…



Image result for volleyball water




… not on a handball…



Image result for handball




… not on play-pen balls…



Image result for balls balls everywhere




… not on an orange (ball)…


Image result for orange water




… not on a floorball…



Image result for floorball water




… not on a water polo ball…



Image result for water polo ball splash




… not on an exercise ball…



Image result for workout ball pool



… not on a squash ball…



Image result for squash ball wet



… not on a beach ball…



Image result for beach ball water



… not on a medicine ball…



Image result for bosu ball water



… not even on a “water ball”…



Image result for waterball




… and most certainly not on a dodgeball wrench…




Image result for dodgeball gif









Yet, despite all the obvious evidence right in front of our eyes, we still believe that water can stick to this ball?!









Image result for picard facepalm gif
































Image result for looks over shakes head
















































Image result for sure why not gif












As most 6th graders (should) know, the very first step of the scientific method is “Observation”…


Image result for scientific method


Real science is repeatable at any scale, no matter how big or how large or small.


With that in mind…








Image result for pseudoscientist weed






The wait begins…





Image result for i'll wait gif






… (and will never end)






To conclude this post, I will leave you with Dead or Alive, who’s song You Spin Me Round (Like A Record) inspired the title of this post.



The music video below is drowning in occult symbolism, so those of you who have read most of my earlier posts will probably find it interesting to read my analysis below, which is based on what we have covered thus far in this blog.

Those who haven’t read my earlier posts will unfortunately think some of the analysis is a bit silly, but I recommend going back and reading earlier blog posts (I have linked to them as appropriate below), to get a better grasp of what is being said below.

Anyways, here is the song. Enjoy!




In the music video above you will find the following symbolism:

  • Spinning (globe/disco) Ball
    • Shown zoomed in at the start and end of the video (as pictured below).
    • As you know by now, freemasons and royalty like to mock us by putting the fake globe/orb in plain sight, and this is more of the same – along with serving as subconscious globe programming.

Sceptre_de_Charles_V 5b399dc7c95084e070fcf675be415ecd  6657891345_7b306856c1_m  Gerard_van_Honthorst_006


  • The Colour Purple
    • Purple appears everywhere in the video, as well as on the album cover above.
    • We discussed the significance of the colour purple in depth in Purple Haze, up in my brain.
    • Jupiter/Zeus rules the colour purple, and George Washington was portrayed as Jupiter/Zeus in purple at Capitol Hill (as discussed in Capitol Hill and Dollar Bills).
  • The Colour Gold
    • Gold appears on the present ribbon, on clothing, on the flags that are waved, and on the ribbon entwined around the singer.
    • Gold symbolizes finance/money, wealth, and power, and you can find it on the pope’s robes and royal crowns and robes too (as shown above).
    • Gold is often found on Egyptian hieroglyphs and at the tip of obelisks, as seen in Obelisks and City Maps (eg. the Paris obelisk), due to its excellent electromagnetic properties.



  • One-eye Symbolism
    • The eye-patch hides one eye, and is thus a popular symbol for the eye of Horus, which we discussed in Links to the Ancients.
    • Notice that the singer only has the eye-patch on when he is wearing the colour black.
      • The colour black is associated with death, and by extension the passing of time.
      • Time was a general theme in and around posts 45 of this blog, and is heavily associated with the owl which we discussed mainly in posts 5, 6, and 9.


Image result for hollywood one eye  one eye Image result for eye of horus


  • The evocation of Shiva
    • Shiva is the Hindu god of destruction.
    • The pattern formed by the arms at about 1:25 in the video is the same hexagonal pattern that Shiva statues form (as pictured below).
      • There happens to be a statue of Shiva at CERN – the world’s largest particle accelerator which isn’t  not dissimilar from the one at Brookhaven which we discussed in Energy Weapons: Tesla’s Suppressed Technologies.
      • Now what in the wooorld could a statue of “the god of destruction” be doing at the most advanced scientific facility in the world?!…



  • Beast and Effeminate symbolism
    • Notice how you never see who’s arms are coming out from behind the singer… a hidden hand pulling the strings perhaps?…
      • You are shown (twice even, for effect) that the hands behind him are beast-like in their appearance, with claw-like uncut nails
    • Also notice that the lead singer has many effeminate characteristics, including:
      • the way he dances;
      • the length and style of his hair;
      • eye-liner; and
      • lipstick…
      • … what message does this send to young boys and men watching do you think?…


  • The Entwined Ribbon/Serpent
    • At multiple points in the song the singers have ribbons entwined around them.
      • The colours of the spinning ribbons (at 1:10) are purple and gold.
      • The black ribbon has the singers tied down nice and tight (remember, black represents death/time…).
    • Judging by the symbol for Medicine (which is the same hexagonal symbol that was shown earlier in the video related to Shiva, as discussed above) then it is clear that this is serpent symbolism.
      • As seen in Leylines: An Introduction and Leylines: Part 2 serpent worship has been on-going for a long time.
      • Notice how the golden ribbon entwirled around the lead singer below looks very much like that of a serpent wrapped around a tree…
      • Notice also that the spinning (disco) ball (pictured above) has a present ribbon on it.
        • Pres-ent” is an anagram for “Serp-ent”…


  • Seductive Lyrics
    • The lyrics are very seductive and include the following phrases:
      • I, could trace your private number, baby
      • Open up your lovin’ arms
      • I want some, want some
      • I’ve got to have my way now, baby
      • Open up your lovin’ arms
      • I would like to move in just a little bit closer
      • I want your love
      • Watch out, here I come
    • The lyrics also include:
      • You spin me right round (…) like a record.
        • Does that allude to the flat Earth (record-shaped plane)?…


  • Occult Release Dates
    • This single was released November 5th, 1984
      • November 5th is Guy Fawkes day, which is a key date on the pagan calendar, involving fire, with huge  bonfires lit ceremonially…
    • The album this song appeared on – Youthquake, was released in May 1985
      • May is the period of the Beltane Fire festival, as discussed in depth in Festivals of Fire.
    • November 5th is 11/5, and 6 months and 6 days later on the reverse date of 5/11 (May 11th, 1985) was when the Bradford City fire happened (56 deaths, 265 injured).
      • It may be completely unrelated, but I’m just documenting dates and numbers here for reference sake, so don’t go tearing out your hair if you’re not familiar with synchronicity (which we discussed in An Introduction to Synchronicity).


  • Production
    • The song reached number 1 in March 1985
    • It was included on Dead or Alive’s Greatest Hits album “Evolution
    • Directed by Vaughan Arnell and Anthea Benton
      • They have done many notable music videos, and would thus no doubt have clear ties on the occult side of the music industry.
      • Notice the titles of many of the major songs they have produced share similar themes as You Spin Me Right Round (Like a Record):
        • Curiosity Killed the Cat – Down to Earth (1986)
        • Jamiroquai – Space Cowboy (1994)
        • George Michael – Spinning the Wheel (1996)
        • Take That – Back for Good (1995)
        • Robbie Williams – Let Me Entertain You (1998)
        • Robbie Williams – Eternity (2001)
        • James Blunt – Bonfire Heart (2013)


  • Cover Versions
    • Aged Teen
    • Crystal Waters (1997)
    • Adam Sandler
      • cover version in the opening to the movie The Wedding Singer (1998)
      • part of the soundtrack for Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (2009)
    • Ten Masked Men (2000)
    • Gigi D’Agostino (2000)
    • Thalía (2002)
    • RoboSapien (2004)
    • Dope (2005)
    • Jessica Simpson (2006)
    • Danzel (2007)
    • Konami (2007)
      • featured on video game Dance Dance Revolution Hottest Party.
    • Thea Gilmore feat. Mike Cave (2008)
    • Flo Rida (2009)
      • featured prominently in the movie The Hangover (2009)
    • Indochine (2009)
    • Glee
      • Episode “The Hurt Locker, Part 2” (2015)


The song clearly involves a ton of occult symbolism in both the music video and lyrics.

As you can see from the long list of covers and movies the song has appeared in, the music industry and Hollywood love to re-package and redistribute their favourite songs, in order to repeat the occult subliminal and subconscious messages to unsuspecting listeners.


And in this case, that message is this:





To be continued