20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby

 

 

In the last post (What Goes Around, Comes Around), we learned that:

  • the sun and moon are both only about 3,500 miles away;
  • they are both 32 nautical miles in diameter;
  • they only appear to change height due to perspective;
  • they travel in a circular path above the Flat Earth (FE) plane;
  • the sky is reflective and dome-shaped, as proven by the existence of rainbows and sundogs;
  • the 24 hour sun in both the Arctic and Antarctic are accounted for by the FE model;
  • the lunar phases are perfectly explained by the FE model;
  • eclipses make perfect sense on the FE model, but would be practically impossible on a globe;
  • the sun and moon are kept at the height they are at due to electromagnetic levitation;
  • the opposing energies of the sun and moon are responsible for the tides;
  • weather patterns (including temperature, wind, currents, etc) correspond perfectly to the movement of the sun and moon on a FE map.

 

That’s a pretty good case for the Flat Earth on its own…

 

… but in any case, let’s recap some of the other things we have learned thus far as well:

 

Kings Royal Crown 

    

 

 

square 

 

 

 Freemasons (1)

 

 

SGU-From-pole-to-pole-PE-half-1200-cp9

 

  • We have mathematically proven that the Earth is a flat plane (in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology), using magnetism (as observed in nature) and mathematics – including vector equilibrium, sacred geometry, and the golden mean (phi):

 

Image result for axis flat earth

 

 

  • We also saw in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology that the flat Earth map appears on the UN logo, as well as in the logos of many other leading institutions:

 

 

  • We’ve seen (in The Greatest Liars of All Time) that all footage of space, the moon, and Earth provided to us by NASA is faked using a combination of CGI, photoshop, and many other means:

 

Image result for sun movement flat earth  

 

  • We calculated the expected curvature on a spherical globe (in Look Around, it will Astound You), and saw that there is in fact, no noticeable curve around us – neither visibly, nor by observing the behaviour of water (which always finds its level):

 

Image result for pythagoras flat earth curvature      Image result for water flat earth

 

… and finally,

 

 

Image result for parallel sun rays flat earth img_7419 (2)

img_9185.png

 

Thus, the evidence for the Flat Earth is starting to stack up rather quickly…

 

person-lot-paperwork-d-looking-up-big-pile-folders-39133616

 

 

… but you’ll be happy to know that there’s still plenty left for us to pick apart! 🙂

 

 

 

Image result for oh boy meme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In this post, we’re going to add to that mounting pile of evidence by addressing the magical spinning ball.

 

Image result for spin gif

 

First, some words of wisdom to get you in the right frame of mind…

 

 

 

 

On that note, here’s hoping that what you learned in The Greatest Liars of All Time will help you keep an open mind in this post…

 

 

We begin, by taking a look at the ball found in the top-left corner in the picture above – the globe Earth…

 

 

The Spinning Ball

 

We are told by science that the Earth spins at 1040 mph…

 

earth spin

 

Image result for throw earth gif

 

… while travelling around the Sun at 30km/s…  (66,6000 mph)…

speed of earth

 

Image result for solar system gif

 

… which itself orbits the Galaxy at 450,000 mph…

 

sun speed

 

 

Image result for solar system gif Image result for earth movement gif

 

… which spins at 515,000 mph…

 

a6.JPG

Image result for galaxy spin gif

 

 

… which moves at an astounding 1.3 million mph in a random direction through the vacuum of the Universe…

a8

Image result for galaxy moving gif

 

… which is expanding at H0 = 67.15 ± 1.2 (km/s)/Mpc…

Image result for what even is that

 

 

 

 

Capture.JPG

Image result for universe gif

Image result for expansion of universe

 

… and which gets faster in its acceleration as it gets bigger.

a9.JPG

Image result for expansion of universe

 

 

Are you confused yet?

 

 

Image result for spinning eyes gif

 

 

 

Image result for huh gif

 

 

 

Want to know why you’re confused?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because…

 

 

 

 

Image result for drum roll gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for pile gif

 

 

 

 

Image result for thats good gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for fist bump gif the office

 

 

 

Next question…

 

 

 

Do you feel that?

 

 

 

 

Image result for uh no meme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for obviously

 

 

download

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for looking around gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for um no meme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for me neither

 

 

 

 

 

 

cuylz0nvyaan3cv

 

 

 

 

maxresdefault

 

 

 

 

download (4)

 

 

Is it:

 

  1. because the Earth is so big relative to us that we can’t feel it?

 

 

Image result for nodding pointing gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

… or is it

 

2. because the Earth isn’t actually moving?

 

Image result for you for real gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for nodding pointing gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wrong answer, Number 2!

 

 

Image result for number 2 gif

 

 

Another question – but first some (real) science to give you some background…

 

If the Earth is a ball spinning about the axis that connects its poles,

… then the speed of rotation would be fastest at the equator and slowest at places north and south of the equator, and a whopping 0 km/h at the poles…

Image result for earth spin speed

This is due to centripetal force…

Image result for centripetal force

 

The formula for centripetal force (F) is given by

Image result for centripetal force equation

… where

  • F is the force;
  • m is the mass of the object;
  • v is the angular velocity*; and
  • r is the radius.

*angular velocity means that it is the tangential velocity (as shown below), not the radial velocity (it is labelled slightly wrong in the diagram above):

Image result for centripetal force

Multiplying both sides of the equation above by r, the formula above can also be written as

F r = m v²

Thus, we see that the radius is proportional to the velocity squared…

r ∝ v²

… Meaning that, the further one is from the central axis, the greater the speed will be (much greater in fact, because the velocity is squared).

 

Now then, looking at the diagram below, you will notice that as you move away from the equator (towards the North or South), the distance away from the central axis (i.e. the radius of the circle) would decrease.

Therefore, the further away you are from the equator (north or south), the slower you spin…

Image result for earth spin speed

As you can see above, the speed at the equator is given as 1,650 km/h (or 1,040mph).

As your distance away from the axis (your radius) at the North pole is zero, your spinning speed would be 0 km/h at the pole.

Thus, if you traveled from the equator to the North pole, the speed that you are spinning at would change by 1,650 km/h.

That is, you would go from spinning at 1,650 km/h, to spinning at 0 km/h,… (or 1,040 mph to 0 mph).

 

Another example:

If you flew from Nairobi, Kenya (which is located on the equator) to Stockholm, Sweden, the speed at which you spin around the globe would change by about 800 km/h

 

To put that in perspective,

 

  • 12 km/h     Image result for runner
  •  30 km/h      Image result for bicycle
  • 150 km/h     Image result for car clipart
  • 300 km/h    453047157
  • 900 km/h      Image result for air plane clip art black and white
  • 2,200 km/h       fighter-clipart-359FDDC4-7586-46F4-B2D5-0DAE342A409F

 

This means that the difference between being on the North pole, and being somewhere on the equator, is roughly equivalent to the difference between standing still (0 km/h), and travelling in a fighter jet going at 1,650 km/h

… and the difference between being in Nairobi, Kenya, and being in Stockholm, Sweden, is roughly equivalent to the difference between standing still, and travelling on an airliner at 800 km/h

 

images (4)

 

 

 

 

 

Sooo…

The question I was going to ask (before all this scientific stuff)…

… is this:

 

Have you ever felt any change in your speed when moving from north to south (or south to north)?

…(let alone a change of 100’s of mph)…

 

 

 

Image result for umm no gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“oh but if the change is gradual you won’t feel a difference”

33069661.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

flat-earth-memes-22-3

 

 

 

 

Here’s another fun fact:

 

Image result for spin flat earth

 

As you can see below, the speed of sound is given as 768 mph…

speed of sound

Now, the Doppler Effect – which you already encountered in Purple Haze: up in my brain… tells us that sound waves will be compressed in the direction of motion…

… This is why you can hear the sound of a police siren getting louder as it moves towards you, and quieter as it moves away from you:

 

Image result for doppler effect

 

With the Doppler effect in mind, and considering that the Earth is spinning towards the East at 1040mph – which is considerably greater than the 768mph speed of sound…

… that means that if we say something towards the West (against the direction that the Earth in spinning)… then nobody will be able to hear anything, because the sound will have traveled in the other direction (towards the East) already!

 

West

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for can you hear me

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for crickets gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By contrast, if you spoke to the East (i.e. the direction the Earth is spinning), the sound would come at the person listening so fast it would be both extremely loud and incomprehensible.

 

East

 

Here are two short videos explaining this in a little bit more detail:

 

 

 

So with that in mind, if your mother-in-law is visiting, or if your wife is nagging you…

 

Image result for monkey pushing laptop gif Image result for nagging gif

 

…. all you have to do, is make sure they’re facing West and you won’t have to listen to them!

 

Image result for man headphones gif

 

 

 

Image result for thats good gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for oh hell no

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for thats sexist gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

Image result for on the internet gif

 

 

 

 

Image result for nagging gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for bill murray golf

 

 

Image result for joke meme

 

 

Anywaaaays, to get back on topic…

 

Cq_TtDBWIAEUNGF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That’s a lot of common sense!

 

 

 

Image result for common sense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shall you tell him or shall I?

 

 

Image result for wait for it gif

 

 

Anyways, lets take a look at some more actual common sense…

 

Are you ready?

 

 

Image result for ready? gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for ready gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Great, lets dive right in then!

 

 

dive.gif

 

 

Let’s first take a look at flights on a spinning ball, because…

 

 

Image result for top gun gif

 

 

Flights on the Spinning Ball

For an introduction on why flights are impossible on the spinning ball, please watch this quick 2 min video. Note that the link appears broken but it works fine (or did when I last checked!)

 

 

To build on what was said in the video above,

 

Image result for spin flat earth

 

In other words, without correcting its course downwards, a pilot would fly his plane straight off the ball, like illustrated here by the red line:

 

Imagenes_21

 

In order to maintain a steady altitude and not fly straight off the ball and into space, an airliner traveling at 800 km/h would have to dip its nose and descend by 850m… per minute!

 

 

 

Image result for panic airplane

 

 

 

 

Image result for sweating airplane gif

 

 

 

 

Image result for panic airplane

 

 

 

 

CqSy_ekVMAATnLl

 

 

Image result for danger zone meme

 

Now, if we were on a spinning ball, it would be impossible for planes to land on the ground like they do, unless the Earth was not moving.

Allow me to illustrate:

landing

 

If the Earth is spinning to the East (at 1,040mph), and a plane is moving towards a runway in a Northwestern direction (with a landing speed of a Boeing 777 is around 160mph)…

landing 4

… then it would be impossible for the plane to land, as the Earth would spin out from under it (remember, the Earth is moving at 1000mph, and the plane at an angle to it at 160mph), so the plane would simply crash sideways off the runway immediately after touching down!

landing 6

 

landing 7

 

 

Image result for sweating airplane gif

 

 

Image result for talk to me goose gif

 

 

 

goose

 

 

 

Image result for top gun meme

 

In other words:

landing 3

 

Furthermore, as outlined in the video above, if the Earth was spinning the distance flown between two points in opposite directions could never be the same…

flight 1

 

Image result for flat earth sun diameter

 

In fact, a plane flying at 800mph towards the East, would actually be flying backwards, as the Earth below it would be spinning at 1000mph in the same direction… so its target destination would be moving away from it.

In other words, relative to the ground, the airplanes speed would be 240mph, backwards… just like the speed of sound you saw earlier!

 

flight

 

Thus, a flight going East, would fly backwards, and a flight flying West would get to its destination super quick as the destination would move towards the plane.

 

download (1)

 

For a good explanation on flights relative to the Earth spin, watch this video:

 

 

The graphics below illustrate why airplanes can’t physically take-off on a spinning ball.

For example, any plane taking off towards the West would have to overcome a 1,040mph headwind:

 

csawlalwyaaoi69

 

 

ctxbpsyweaa3z1y

 

 

Here’s another useful visual for explaining the huge effects of drag on an object in the air:

csawt7ywcaahjze

 

 

 

 

There are other proofs related to flights showing that the Earth cannot be a spinning ball, such as the omni-directional radio:

csayd12xyaixrro

 

Gyroscope’s also offer us an obvious proof:

 

Image result for gyroscope

 

In essence, the reason why Gyroscopes prove that we do not live on a spinning ball is illustrated below. A gyroscope simply doesn’t behave as we would expect if we were on a ball.

CnpUzuOWcAAEwdv

 

 

capturefdf

 

Below is an 11 min video that goes into a lot of detail about why gyroscopes can prove that the Earth is flat.

As its a rather complex explanation I’m going to let the video do most of the talking on this occasion, and only briefly cover the most obvious point below.

 

Pilots use gyroscopes to ensure that they are level with the ground when coming in for a landing…

Image result for gyroscope cockpit

 

Now, think about this for a second…

How can a gyroscope find its level, if we are on a ball?

 

Image result for curved earth

 

The answer is that it can’t, because a curved surface is never level!

 

 

 

Image result for he's right you know meme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aircraft trimming is further evidence that we do not live on a spinning ball, as outlined by this 3min video:

 

 

So how could so many pilots be deceived?

 

Well,

 

tesla

 

 

 

Pilots have learned the same pseudoscience as everyone else, and thinking themselves to be intellectual and well-educated they probably never thought to question the strong-held beliefs that they’ve been told are true their whole lives…

 

 

 

 

Image result for top gun meme

 

 

 

Image result for top gun gif

 

 

Image result for boom gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anyways, we’re now gonna move on from planes…

 

 

… because quite frankly,

 

 

 

 

snakes meme final

 

 

 

 

Image result for top gun gif

 

 

 

Top-gun-you-can-be-my-wingman-any-time.gif

 

 

Now then, the video above (i.e. the one titled The Earth is Not Moving) shows you how we would experience the atmosphere if the Earth was spinning, so I will cover the basics of that here.

 

The Atmosphere on a Spinning Ball

As you’ve seen above, if the Earth is spinning at 1,040 mph, it would be impossible for planes to land.

 

It would also mean that hot air balloons and helicopters should just be able to fly straight up, and then hover for a while until the location then wanted to get to appeared below them!

 

 

 

 

CrfeHbGVIAA2pof.jpg

 

 

 

impossible-pear-earth

 

 

 

crabab_xeaen37w

 

 

 

 

crieq8hw8aaur97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taking this a step further, if the ground was spinning at a constant velocity of 1,040 mph, that would mean that there would be a constant wind outside of 1,040 mph

 

To put that in perspective, a category four hurricane (the strongest type) typically reaches speeds of up to 150 mph

hurricane

 

If 150 mph winds can do this…

 

Image result for hurricane Image result for hurricane Image result for tornado

 

Image result for wind gif

 

… then you better hold onto your hat next time you go outside into the 1,040 mph winds!

 

Image result for hat blown off gif

 

 

 

As such, we know that the Earth doesn’t spin relative to the atmosphere, otherwise if you put your head out of your bedroom window it would get torn off at 1040 mph!

 

Image result for wind gif

 

 

 

“Oh but the atmosphere moves with the spin of the Earth!”

“Bet you can’t explain that!”

Image result for explain that gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for explain that gif

 

Logical, but there are two big problems with that reasoning.

 

Firstly, 

As explained in the video above (i.e. the one called The Earth Is Not Moving), it would not be possible for the air to be moving with the Earth, because it would not be moving in a straight line…

… Air higher up would have to travel faster…

Image result for earth spin falling off

 

This is because of centripetal force which you learned about above…

 

Image result for centripetal force

 

 

As you know the radius is proportional to the velocity squared…

r ∝ v²

Now, anything that is higher up in the sky has a greater radius (as measured from the center of the globe), so the higher up in the sky you are, the higher the velocity will be…

By the way, we also saw this behaviour with the sun and moon in What Goes Around, Comes Around, as the sun travels faster further out and slower further in while circling in its annual path – due to covering a greater distance in the same amount of time…

Untitled

In the same way, air that is further up in the sky needs to travel further than air that is lower down.

Thus, fireworks, rain, and clouds (and anything else we see in the sky), would not behave anything like they do, as the drops/clouds/fireworks higher up in the sky would be moving faster than those below, so what we would see would be nothing like what we actually observe in the sky.

air 2

 

To give you a simple example, a cloud above our heads would never be able to be still in the sky in the absence of wind… because each “layer” would be moving at a slightly different speed…

Image result for cloud

 

Essentially, clouds higher up would always be travelling faster than clouds lower down…

… But of course, that is not what we see, as clouds generally tend to move uniformly at the same speed regardless of their height.

Image result for horizon clouds Image result for clouds horizon gif

 

Secondly,

Another reason why the atmosphere moving with the Earth wouldn’t work, is that exiting and entering space would be utterly impossible.

Consider this:

Science tells us that space begins at a height of about 100 km

space.JPG

 

If the Earth is spinning at 1,040 mph at ground level on the equator – at a radius of just 6,371 km…

That means that, at a height of 100km the atmosphere would be spinning at a speed even greater than 1,040 mph… (it would be greater because you are 100km above the ground, so your radius is bigger).

So with that in mind…. what do you think would happen when a space shuttle flies out of the atmosphere and into the vacuum of space (which as a vacuum, would have a speed of 0 mph)?…

 

 

 

I’ll give you a clue:

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for tornado gif

 

 

Many people like to claim that a ball being thrown into the air in a moving car and subsequently not hitting the back windshield is “proof” that the Earth is a spinning ball, but as this video eloquently outlines, that is most certainly not the case:

 

 

 

 

To summarize, if the Earth is spinning,

Either you have

 

 

  • The Earth spinning without the atmosphere – in which case you have 1,040 mph winds that tear your head off if you go outside…

 

… or…

 

  • The atmosphere moves with the ground – in which case the clouds you see outside would appear totally differently, and spaceships entering the vacuum of space would be torn to shreds due to the speed difference with space (of much greater than 1,000 mph).

 

 

 

 

Now, with all that in mind, ask yourself…

 

Do you believe the Earth spins because of anything you have experienced or seen for yourself,…

… or do you believe it spins because you have been told that it spins, and been bombarded with that message constantly on TV your whole life?

 

 

 

Image result for logo globe bbc Image result for cnn globeImage result for universal pictures logo

 

 

 

Image result for you have been brainwashed

 

 

 

Image result for you have been brainwashed

 

 

Let’s move on to another “proof” our “experts” tell us about…

 

 

“Coriolis Effect”

 

It is claimed by scientists that bullets, hurricanes, and other flying objects will swerve due to what is called the “Coriolis Effect”…

 

coriolis

 

Image result for coriolis effect       Image result for coriolis effect

 

So let me get this straight,

The Coriolis effect occurs, because the Earth spins and the atmosphere is affected by the spin…

This is all great, except for the fact that it overlooks the first point we made above:

… That if the Earth was in fact spinning separate from the atmosphere, the wind speed on the surface of Earth would be so fast and violent (1,040mph) that nothing could exist on the Earth’s surface…

 

 

 

Image result for duh gif

 

 

Nonetheless, let’s briefly consider it, just so we can put it out of its misery…

 

 

Image result for put out of its misery

 

 

Now, the main factors for snipers to take into account in long-range shots are

  1. distance to target;
  2. humidity;
  3. height from the target; and
  4. wind variation…

… and as it happens, snipers never actually adjust for this mythical Coriolis Effect… because if they did, they’d be shooting in completely the wrong direction, as these simple calculations show:

 

coriolis2

 

 

 

 

 

15672967_359997747695589_7659646250746968177_n

 

 

 

c1npdpswiaamdkb

 

As you can see, the Coriolis Effect is clearly a load of…

 

Image result for nonsense stamp

 

Here is a short 4 min video on the Coriolis Effect which also rubbishes the idea that toilets in the northern and southern hemisphere flush in different directions:

 

 

As discussed in the video above, contrary to popular belief water does not spin in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemisphere’s.

 

And on that note, let’s take a look at water as it pertains to a spinning ball…

 

 

Be forewarned:

 

 

Image result for common sense

 

 

 

Water on a Spinning Ball

The USGS states that about 71% of Earth is covered by water, with 96.5% of its water in the oceans. The total volume held by oceans, seas, and bays is estimated to be 321,000,000 cubic miles*…

 *to put that in perspective, this page gives a good comparison for how much water fits into one cubic mile.

water.JPG

 

There is also plenty more water in bodies like river, lakes, (along with water in vapour, icecaps, glaciers etc)…

 

Image result for thats alot of water

 

 

Basically, there is a whole lot of water floating around on this ball…

 

 

earth-squeezie-extralarge

 

Beyond the obvious deduction that water never actually curves, but always finds its level – as discussed in Look Around, It Will Astound You)…

 

Image result for water flat earth

 

… the photo below should be enough to show you what is wrong with the spinning globe…

 

 

In fact, water never sticks to any ball, regardless if its spinning or not…

 

Not on a golf ball…

 

Image result for water drop ball

 

 

… Not on a football (soccer) ball…

 

 

Image result for water football

 

 

 

… Not on a cricket ball…

 

 

Image result for cricket ball water

 

 

 

… Not on a tennis ball…

 

 

Image result for wet tennis ball

 

 

 

… Not on a bowling ball…

 

 

Image result for bowling ball water

 

 

 

… Not on a water fountain ball…

 

 

Image result for bowling ball water

 

 

 

… Not on a ping pong ball…

 

 

Image result for ping pong ball water

 

 

 

… Not on a basketball…

 

 

Image result for basketball water

 

 

 

… Not on a baseball…

 

 

Image result for baseball water on

 

 

 

… Not on a snooker ball…

 

 

Image result for snooker ball water

 

 

 

… Not on a volleyball…

 

 

Image result for volleyball water

 

 

 

… not on a handball…

 

 

Image result for handball

 

 

 

… not on play-pen balls…

 

 

Image result for balls balls everywhere

 

 

 

… not on an orange (ball)…

 

Image result for orange water

 

 

 

… not on a floorball…

 

 

Image result for floorball water

 

 

 

… not on a water polo ball…

 

 

Image result for water polo ball splash

 

 

 

… not on an exercise ball…

 

 

Image result for workout ball pool

 

 

… not on a squash ball…

 

 

Image result for squash ball wet

 

 

… not on a beach ball…

 

 

Image result for beach ball water

 

 

… not on a medicine ball…

 

 

Image result for bosu ball water

 

 

… not even on a “water ball”…

 

 

Image result for waterball

 

 

 

… and most certainly not on a dodgeball wrench…

 

 

 

Image result for dodgeball gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yet, despite all the obvious evidence right in front of our eyes, we still believe that water can stick to this ball?!

 

earth-squeezie-extralarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for picard facepalm gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for looks over shakes head

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cq_TnBXWYAANd6b

 

 

 

capturefafds

 

 

z1

 

 

 

fdsfadsf

 

 

flat-earth-memes-73-8

 

 

a1

 

 

a2

 

 

coriolis

 

 

 

Cq-wYVfWYAE7km6.jpg

 

 

15622341_1698554383788814_6276463712459699878_n

 

 

 

mirrrr

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for sure why not gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

osho

 

As most 6th graders (should) know, the very first step of the scientific method is “Observation”…

 

Image result for scientific method

 

Real science is repeatable at any scale, no matter how big or how large or small.

 

With that in mind…

 

Cp6OtBRW8AAdoFR

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for pseudoscientist weed

 

 

 

 

 

The wait begins…

 

 

 

 

Image result for i'll wait gif

 

 

 

 

 

… (and will never end)

 

 

 


 

 

To conclude this post, I will leave you with Dead or Alive, who’s song You Spin Me Round (Like A Record) inspired the title of this post.

 

 

The music video below is drowning in occult symbolism, so those of you who have read most of my earlier posts will probably find it interesting to read my analysis below, which is based on what we have covered thus far in this blog.

Those who haven’t read my earlier posts will unfortunately think some of the analysis is a bit silly, but I recommend going back and reading earlier blog posts (I have linked to them as appropriate below), to get a better grasp of what is being said below.

Anyways, here is the song. Enjoy!

 

 

 

In the music video above you will find the following symbolism:

  • Spinning (globe/disco) Ball
    • Shown zoomed in at the start and end of the video (as pictured below).
    • As you know by now, freemasons and royalty like to mock us by putting the fake globe/orb in plain sight, and this is more of the same – along with serving as subconscious globe programming.

Sceptre_de_Charles_V 5b399dc7c95084e070fcf675be415ecd  6657891345_7b306856c1_m  Gerard_van_Honthorst_006

 

  • The Colour Purple
    • Purple appears everywhere in the video, as well as on the album cover above.
    • We discussed the significance of the colour purple in depth in Purple Haze, up in my brain.
    • Jupiter/Zeus rules the colour purple, and George Washington was portrayed as Jupiter/Zeus in purple at Capitol Hill (as discussed in Capitol Hill and Dollar Bills).
  • The Colour Gold
    • Gold appears on the present ribbon, on clothing, on the flags that are waved, and on the ribbon entwined around the singer.
    • Gold symbolizes finance/money, wealth, and power, and you can find it on the pope’s robes and royal crowns and robes too (as shown above).
    • Gold is often found on Egyptian hieroglyphs and at the tip of obelisks, as seen in Obelisks and City Maps (eg. the Paris obelisk), due to its excellent electromagnetic properties.

 

 

  • One-eye Symbolism
    • The eye-patch hides one eye, and is thus a popular symbol for the eye of Horus, which we discussed in Links to the Ancients.
    • Notice that the singer only has the eye-patch on when he is wearing the colour black.
      • The colour black is associated with death, and by extension the passing of time.
      • Time was a general theme in and around posts 45 of this blog, and is heavily associated with the owl which we discussed mainly in posts 5, 6, and 9.

 

Image result for hollywood one eye  one eye Image result for eye of horus

 

  • The evocation of Shiva
    • Shiva is the Hindu god of destruction.
    • The pattern formed by the arms at about 1:25 in the video is the same hexagonal pattern that Shiva statues form (as pictured below).
      • There happens to be a statue of Shiva at CERN – the world’s largest particle accelerator which isn’t  not dissimilar from the one at Brookhaven which we discussed in Energy Weapons: Tesla’s Suppressed Technologies.
      • Now what in the wooorld could a statue of “the god of destruction” be doing at the most advanced scientific facility in the world?!…

 

 

  • Beast and Effeminate symbolism
    • Notice how you never see who’s arms are coming out from behind the singer… a hidden hand pulling the strings perhaps?…
      • You are shown (twice even, for effect) that the hands behind him are beast-like in their appearance, with claw-like uncut nails
    • Also notice that the lead singer has many effeminate characteristics, including:
      • the way he dances;
      • the length and style of his hair;
      • eye-liner; and
      • lipstick…
      • … what message does this send to young boys and men watching do you think?…

 

  • The Entwined Ribbon/Serpent
    • At multiple points in the song the singers have ribbons entwined around them.
      • The colours of the spinning ribbons (at 1:10) are purple and gold.
      • The black ribbon has the singers tied down nice and tight (remember, black represents death/time…).
    • Judging by the symbol for Medicine (which is the same hexagonal symbol that was shown earlier in the video related to Shiva, as discussed above) then it is clear that this is serpent symbolism.
      • As seen in Leylines: An Introduction and Leylines: Part 2 serpent worship has been on-going for a long time.
      • Notice how the golden ribbon entwirled around the lead singer below looks very much like that of a serpent wrapped around a tree…
      • Notice also that the spinning (disco) ball (pictured above) has a present ribbon on it.
        • Pres-ent” is an anagram for “Serp-ent”…

 

  • Seductive Lyrics
    • The lyrics are very seductive and include the following phrases:
      • I, could trace your private number, baby
      • Open up your lovin’ arms
      • I want some, want some
      • I’ve got to have my way now, baby
      • Open up your lovin’ arms
      • I would like to move in just a little bit closer
      • I want your love
      • Watch out, here I come
    • The lyrics also include:
      • You spin me right round (…) like a record.
        • Does that allude to the flat Earth (record-shaped plane)?…

 

  • Occult Release Dates
    • This single was released November 5th, 1984
      • November 5th is Guy Fawkes day, which is a key date on the pagan calendar, involving fire, with huge  bonfires lit ceremonially…
    • The album this song appeared on – Youthquake, was released in May 1985
      • May is the period of the Beltane Fire festival, as discussed in depth in Festivals of Fire.
    • November 5th is 11/5, and 6 months and 6 days later on the reverse date of 5/11 (May 11th, 1985) was when the Bradford City fire happened (56 deaths, 265 injured).
      • It may be completely unrelated, but I’m just documenting dates and numbers here for reference sake, so don’t go tearing out your hair if you’re not familiar with synchronicity (which we discussed in An Introduction to Synchronicity).

 

  • Production
    • The song reached number 1 in March 1985
    • It was included on Dead or Alive’s Greatest Hits album “Evolution
    • Directed by Vaughan Arnell and Anthea Benton
      • They have done many notable music videos, and would thus no doubt have clear ties on the occult side of the music industry.
      • Notice the titles of many of the major songs they have produced share similar themes as You Spin Me Right Round (Like a Record):
        • Curiosity Killed the Cat – Down to Earth (1986)
        • Jamiroquai – Space Cowboy (1994)
        • George Michael – Spinning the Wheel (1996)
        • Take That – Back for Good (1995)
        • Robbie Williams – Let Me Entertain You (1998)
        • Robbie Williams – Eternity (2001)
        • James Blunt – Bonfire Heart (2013)

 

  • Cover Versions
    • Aged Teen
    • Crystal Waters (1997)
    • Adam Sandler
      • cover version in the opening to the movie The Wedding Singer (1998)
      • part of the soundtrack for Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (2009)
    • Ten Masked Men (2000)
    • Gigi D’Agostino (2000)
    • Thalía (2002)
    • RoboSapien (2004)
    • Dope (2005)
    • Jessica Simpson (2006)
    • Danzel (2007)
    • Konami (2007)
      • featured on video game Dance Dance Revolution Hottest Party.
    • Thea Gilmore feat. Mike Cave (2008)
    • Flo Rida (2009)
      • featured prominently in the movie The Hangover (2009)
    • Indochine (2009)
    • Glee
      • Episode “The Hurt Locker, Part 2” (2015)

 

The song clearly involves a ton of occult symbolism in both the music video and lyrics.

As you can see from the long list of covers and movies the song has appeared in, the music industry and Hollywood love to re-package and redistribute their favourite songs, in order to repeat the occult subliminal and subconscious messages to unsuspecting listeners.

 

And in this case, that message is this:

 

 

 

 

To be continued

 

 

 

 

27 thoughts on “20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby

  1. This one time on an international flight I had a cup of coffee – to my astonishment the cup didn’t fly off the desk and smash into my torso when I put it down.

    This made me think that I was actually on a helicopter just floating in the same spot, would that be possible? I mean, otherwise the cup would’ve smashed around the cabin and I would’ve burnt myself, and probably peed all over the walls in the lavatory too. So obviously the thing wasn’t moving at all and someone was just deceiving me.

    What are your thoughts?

    Like

    • Hi, thanks for your question.

      Allow me to make an analogy –

      If you hold a cup of coffee in your hand in a car moving at a steady 50km/h, it won’t spill. However, if the car were to suddenly brake, your coffee would fly everywhere. This is due to a change in acceleration (or rather, a de-acceleration in this case), as the coffee would suddenly go from a constant velocity to another very different velocity.

      Thus, the key here is the acceleration.

      On an airplane, your cup of coffee is moving at a constant velocity (just as it would in a car moving at a steady 50km/h). However, if the airplane were to suddenly accelerate or de-accelerate, then your coffee would spill, just as it would if you were in a car that suddenly de-accelerated.

      Hope that answers your question 🙂

      Like

  2. Hi, thank you for your reply.

    That’s brilliant. Just a few clearing questions.

    Is the moon actually light source itself or is it only reflecting suns light?

    Also, few questions regarding the lunar eclipse. Sorry if I missed it there between all the exciting information. if you can clarify it here that would be great. What i gathered and studied is that it’s suns shadow object that cause it. Which are never else seen expect when the lunar eclipse occur.
    How can they predict then when is the next lunar eclipse happening? How come this strange shadow object doesn’t block the sun any other times?

    Regards

    Like

    • Thanks David. 🙂

      Those are some really good questions, and I’m glad you asked them as I didn’t really cover them in my post.

      The moon is a most certainly NOT reflecting the suns light. We know this for several reasons; here are three:

      1. As seen by the naked eye, moonlight and sunlight behave the same way. For example, we can see moonlight reflecting on water, and light rays from the moon diverge in exactly the same way that sun rays do.

      2. Moonlight produces its own heat – and interestingly enough it has the complete opposite properties to sunlight (as shown in the video linked below), which incidentally also supports the fact that the sun and moon have opposite electromagnetic energies (in relation to tides as explained near the bottom of Post #19).

      3. If the moon was a sphere only reflecting the suns light, we would expect to see the middle of it to be brighter than the edges, given that light shone onto a sphere wouldn’t all be reflected in the same direction (as illustrated here: goo.gl/btbDFm). What we see in reality is that the moon is lit up equally all over its surface.

      Regarding the lunar eclipse, I think this is on the right track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXHCu39LQdw

      Predicting when lunar eclipses will happen is simply a matter of keeping track of the motion of the sun and moon, and recording the dates and times of all eclipses. Once you know how long it takes for each cycle it becomes fairly straightforward to predict eclipses. Chinese astronomers were particularly good at it, and their records go back thousands of years.

      As to why the sun doesn’t get blocked out, we know from solar eclipses that the moon can travel in front of the sun, and that could only happen if they weren’t level with each other.

      As such, (and with regards to the video above) it would seem that the sun’s circular path is slightly higher than that of the moon, and that the transparent shadow object travels at a height in between the sun and moon.

      Hope that answers your questions adequately! 🙂

      Kind Regards,
      Richard

      Like

  3. Hi,

    Thanks again for the information. No offence, but this is getting a bit weak and contradicting.

    You ask us to believe what we see but yet you believe that there is an invisible, transparent objects that creates the lunar eclipse and all the phases of moon.
    Previously one of the videos were saying the phases are due to the positions of the moon and the sun and now it’s the invisible shadow object.
    Is the shadow object actually near the sun or the moon?
    Is the moon producing it’s own light or is there a hidden light source behind it?
    Either way this really doesn’t work with how we see the phases of the moon.
    It’s very easy to invent another invisible object every time someone questions your theory.

    Regards

    Like

    • Hi David,

      I can see why you would think that the explanation would be contradicting, but allow me to clarify.

      The fact that the moon’s light changes according to its position relative to the sun does NOT mean that it is reflecting the sun’s light. The moon light is independent of the sun, even though its phases changes correlate to its position relative to the sun.

      Based on evidence documented by astronomers for centuries, it would appear that the moon is a translucent disc. Astronomers have in fact documented that they have seen stars THROUGH the moon, as is discussed in this 13 min video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH7BjIzXWOg

      The light source appears to be coming from BEHIND the moon, and it changes its angle according to the moons position. This sounds a bit crazy, but if you shine a flashlight on the back of a translucent disc at a changing angle you will see that it perfectly matches what we see with moon phases. I tried finding a video I’ve seen on that but couldn’t locate it, but I’ll share it once I find it.

      This 14min video will also outline numerous examples of what astronomers have documented with regards to the moon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBbyDye4bS4

      As mentioned in the video above, based on ancient astronomy, as well as what we can see in the sky, there appears to be another transparent celestial object causing the eclipses. Ancient vedic astronomers referred to this as Rahu, or the Black Sun, and you will find evidence for it in many other astronomical archives too, so I am not in fact “inventing another invisible object”.

      This 2min video does a nice job summarizing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpuOmsYtSGE

      I appreciate that my original explanation might have left a hole or two, but I’ll add some more content to the post to plug those holes soon. In the meantime, please do check out the videos above 🙂

      Regards,
      Richard

      Like

  4. Hi, in a rather synronistc way, the day after I read this post, Pete Burns died. I just was wondering if there is any significance in the date and time of his death? I know how they like their sacrifices and so on.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Louise,

      Wow, I hadn’t noticed that he died! That’s crazy!

      Funny that you should ask about that as I just published a post on Gematria and Synchronicity that discusses the significance of dates and numbers: https://thenarrowgateweb.wordpress.com/2016/10/25/26-timing-of-the-nwo-alien-deception/. I anticipate that the stuff below won’t make much sense to anyone who hasn’t read the post linked here.

      Further to the post #26 linked above I would point out the following which I’ve picked up on at a glance:

      Dates
      Born August 5th, 1959.
      – His birthday is 5/8, and he died in his 58th year in life (i.e. at 57). 58 is closely tied to 69, so just like Prince (dead at 58 in 2016) Pete Burns follows the same pattern of celebrity deaths associated with the number 69 this year.
      – The release of his most famous song (“You Spin Me Right Round (Like A Record)”) was in 1985, 85 is a numerical mirror with 58.
      – August 5th converted to the Julian calendar is July 23rd, which has 161 days remaining. 161 are numbers that come up a lot, as you’ll have seen in Post #26.

      Dead October 23rd, 2016
      – October 23 is the 296th day of the year, with 69 remaining… Another 6/9 mirror.

      Pete Burns was born in Bebington, England, which has coordinates of: 53.350°N 3.003°W.. Notice the freemasonic 33 in the coordinates.

      Gematria
      – The gematria of “Peter Burns” in the English Reduction system equals 48, which is the same as “Illuminati”
      – His middle name “Jozzeppi” in the English Reduction system equals 51

      The gematria of his band “Dead or Alive” also includes both 51 (same as “conspiracy”, and Area 51), as well as the familiar 96 (6/9):
      – “dead or alive” in the English Ordinal system equals 96
      – “dead or alive” in the English Reduction system equals 51

      The gematria of his most famous song includes a mirror of the freemasonic number 13:
      – “You Spin Me Round Like a Record” in the English Ordinal system equals 310
      – “You Spin Me Round Like a Record” in the English Reduction system equals 130

      Thanks for pointing this out to me Louise, I’ll actually add it to the aforementioned post! 🙂

      Regards,
      Richard

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: 26. Timing of the Coming NWO Alien Deception | THE NARROW GATE

  6. Great site. You explain every part of your facts including math, and using memes right after to alieve confusion effects on the brain. There are many other things that are wrong with the modern gravity mathematics itself. g= 9.80665 m/s2 is only a representation of rotation. They go as far as saying gravity can also represent 1g. Well if you use calculus, 1 cannot represent a constant in any equation that is multiplied or divide. Example: 1×5=5……1×453=453 1 will never affect the result. Any person taught algebra knows x+y=1 for example. Well in fact it represents 1x+1y=1. negating to add the 1 in front of the letter variable, will not get you the right answer. I have known about gravity being non existent since my course Mechanics and statics in engineering. No gravity is used to calculate pulleys, trusses or rotating shafts. When I asked why, professor said ” If you add gravity to any of these formulas, people will die.” He meant shafts would shatter, pulleys would fail, and trusses would not operate proper loads.

    Since 2002 I have looked into this topic and found many other problems. Like the northern hemisphere having moon and sun most of the day in summer. When the moon is in Australia during their night, it is impossible for me to see it through the globe. I was ridiculed back then, so I left it on the shelf. Now to see the resurgence, I must say this. Look to old books, where internet is always manipulated, books remain unchanged. I found many old encyclopedia’s dismissing the globe and showing flat maps, as you needed a flat map to properly navigate. This was common knowledge before the misinformation started to hit the scene. They started changing editions of books around 1935.

    Take care.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: 23. Destined for Oblivion | THE NARROW GATE

  8. Pingback: 24. Made in a Hollywood Basement | THE NARROW GATE

  9. Pingback: 27. The Stars Declare the Truth | THE NARROW GATE

  10. Pingback: Destroying Gravity by Richard | Plane Not A Planet

  11. Hey,
    Looks like some of the images are dead links – mind finding replacements? Or just host them on your website instead of hotlinking.

    Also it seems that you omit thickness of the atmosphere and water comparing to the radius of the proposed globe and (in both: flat and spherical earth) gravity effects that come of out that enormous mass and volume.

    Like

    • Thanks for pointing that out! I don’t often have the chance to read back over my posts once their published as I immediately start working on new ones, so I really appreciate that you commented to alert me to that.

      I’ve now gone through and re-uploaded several of the images plus some new ones, as well as some videos as it seems that YouTube are slowly but surely removing content they don’t like. If you spot any more missing links or videos be sure to let me know as I have them all saved offline.

      As for the water in the atmosphere, that’s a very good point, though I think there’s already enough evidence for the ridiculousness of the water on the ball (321,000,000 million cubic miles of it, plus lakes, glaciers, etc) that there’s no need to get overly technical by mixing in the atmospheric water too!

      Kind Regards,
      Richard

      Like

  12. I should have read on before posting before!
    Absolutely furthering my theory of the Sun’s rotation above us – The example of a record on a record player.. “You spin me right round, baby right round, like a record baby, right round..”

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Hey Richard, just a question, if I’m in a car travelling at 100 km per hour and I toss a ball up in the air, using the same logic it should smash into the back window of the car in less than 1/10 of a second right?

    I think there are many different ways to approach any number of questions, and they all can have an internal logic that accounts for different effects. You can maybe say there is a flat earth ontology, and its interesting. However, if this existence is (like the hindus have said and perhaps quantum physics is demonstrating) just an expression of consciousness, I prefer an ontology that allows for an expansion beyond my living on a prison planet, and all that comes with that. I believe that to be possible. an infinite universe

    cheers..

    Ben

    Like

    • Hi Ben,

      Regarding your first question, i think this video (posted in the article above) should clarify things: https://youtu.be/QwrwFUOpxuY

      The Flat Earth model doesn’t necessarily rule out the holographic universe/expression of consciousness model. Hopefully some of my upcoming posts (~28-30) can lend some more credibility to that notion.

      Regards,
      Richard

      Like

  14. Hi.
    I discovered you on Wednesday on the Richie Allen Show and I’ve made it to Chapter 20 of your blog so far! It’s very addictive!

    Maybe you mentioned or will mention, but I’ve recently learned that scientists discovered a magnetic anonomoly at the Antarctic and wondered if you knew this and do you believe it’s because the Antarctic is actually around the edge of the earth, as opposed to the bottom, like we are told.

    This is the source of my info, by TruthStream Media.

    Thanks and can’t wait to keep going with your work!

    Joseph V

    Like

    • Thanks, glad you’re finding the website interesting! 🙂

      I hadn’t seen that anomaly at Vostok lake but it is intriguing, so thanks for bringing that to my attention. The secrecy and events relating to Antarctica strike me as having a key role to play in the future deception discussed in post 25. One scenario (relating to Project Blue Beam) would be if archaeological “discoveries” are made that change the way mankind views historical accounts found in religious texts and scripture. Whatever the case Antarctica is certainly one to keep an eye on!

      Kind Regards,
      Richard

      Like

  15. hi richard enjoying reading through your blogs found out about them from your richie allen show appearance. was already looking into flat earth at the time i heard you. many years i did not question the globe model but now the whole idea of a globe is rediculious to me to the point where i feel that the globe should the ridiculed model. i have been questioning weather it is an infinetle plane or a dome you definetly presented some strong eveidance for the dome.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s