Before you read any further here, it is highly recommended that you read the posts listed below first, in order to have a full grasp of the subject matter that will be discussed in this post.
- 16. The Torus and Ancient Cosmology – where a mathematical model of the Universe was derived using magnetism, nature, and mathematics (i.e. sacred geometry, vector equilibrium, and the golden mean/phi). The model matched the model of the cosmos shared by every ancient culture.
- 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time – a study of many of NASA’s lies.
- 18. Look Around, it will Astound You – where the expected curvature of the globe was calculated and compared to reality (to find that we see no curvature); and where perspective was discussed in depth.
- 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around – where we analyzed the behaviour of the sun and moon.
- 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby – where we scrutinized the spinning ball model of Earth provided to us by NASA and scientists.
Note that this post has been split in two to make it easier to navigate and read.
This page thus features Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2), and at the bottom of this page you can simply continue on to Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2/2).
To recap, in the last post – You Spin Me Right Round Baby, we took a look at the spinning ball called Earth…
… and in effect,
… became this:
In the last post we also decoded a substantial amount of symbolism found in the music video of the song You Spin Me Right Round (Like a Record) by Dead or Alive…
… and we’re going to continue on the music theme in this post, which as you shall see will tie in with the main topic of the post… The Ice Wall.
… And with that said, let’s slide on over to my CD collection… 🙂
Do you like Pink Floyd?
Their early work was a little “New Wave” for my taste, but when Dark Side of the Moon came out in 1973 I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically.
The whole album has a clear crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism, that really gives the songs a big boost.
Roger Waters has been compared to Elvis Costello, but I think Roger has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humour.
In 1979, Pink Floyd released this…
…., The Wall, one of their most accomplished albums…
I think their undisputed masterpiece is Another Brick in the Wall…
… a song so catchy, most people probably don’t listen to the lyrics…
.. but they should, because it’s not just about the pleasures of conformity, and the importance of trends, it’s also a personal statement about the band itself.
The video above does a great job of presenting much of the occult (i.e. hidden) meanings of Pink Floyd’s work, so I won’t cover everything about Pink Floyd below, but we will build further on top of what was said in the video.
You may recall from Obelisks and City Plans that the One World Freedom Tower is designed in such a way as to look like a pyramid with a capstone from street-level…
… This peculiar appearance is due to its architectural structure, which is that of an anti-prism:
Now, notice the symbolic album cover to Pink Floyd’s album, Dark Side of the Moon:
We will cover the importance of the anti-prism/prism in a later post, but for now just realize that the symbol placed on the album cover is very significant.
Pink Floyd Synchronicity
Those who have read An Introduction to Synchronicity will perhaps see some significance in the fact that The Wall was released on November 30th, 1979…. or 11/30… as it contains the number 13, as well as 33 (11×3).
Pink Floyd’s other record-selling album Dark Side of the Moon was released on March 1st, which also encodes 13 (1/3).
Note that these two albums are both in the top 20 most sold albums in history:
- Dark Side of the Moon – sold 45 million copies (3rd highest)
- The Wall – sold 30 million copies (20th highest).
Another one of Pink Floyd’s popular albums – A Saucerful of Secrets – pictured below, was released on June 29th, 1968… which is the 181st day of the year in the 1968 leap year, or 11×8=88 – another number that we’ve seen previously (in Leylines: Part 2), notably in the 88.88° alignment between obelisks and domes at the Vatican, Washington DC, and between Stonehenge and Easter Island (which has 888 statues), to name a few.
The number 8 (and owls, as discussed in posts 5 and 6) are in fact related to the theme of time (and death) as we will discuss further in a future post…
As it happens, time is also a theme in many of Pink Floyd’s songs, exemplified by the song titled Time on the album Dark Side of the Moon, as well as by the lyrics to the song The Great Gig in the Sky (among numerous other examples):
And I am not frightened of dying, any time will do, I don’t mind.
Why should I be frightened of dying?
There’s no reason for it, you’ve gotta go sometime.
If you can hear this whispering you are dying.
I never said I was frightened of dying.
As shown in the video above, two of the most blatant themes in Pink Floyd’s work are their references to Ice and Walls, along with numerous cryptic references about Flat Earth.
Ice Wall References
Pink Floyd’s album The Wall features interesting album cover artwork, in the form of an endless white wall…
The album The Wall also includes songs titled “Outside the Wall“, and “The Thin Ice“, so there are numerous clear references to ice as well as walls in the album.
Furthermore, a clip of a circular white wall appears twice in the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2):
One of Pink Floyd’s earliest albums – A Saucerful of Secrets (1968), contains many references to a Flat Earth plane, not least through the album title; along with many cryptic song titles like “Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun”, and “Let There Be More Light”.
The song Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun also features the lyrics “Witness the man who raved at the wall“… showing that walls was a prominent theme on multiple albums.
To point out the obvious, Dark Side of the Moon is also a clear reference to the fact that we never see the back side of the moon, as discussed in What Goes Around, Comes Around.
Dark Side of the Moon also has several other cryptically-titled songs, such as “The Great Gig in the Sky“, and “Eclipse“, as mentioned in the video above.
Now, check out the lyrics for “Wish You Were Here“, off the 1975 album by the same name:
Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail?
A smile from a veil?
Do you think you can tell?
Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze?
Cold comfort for change?
NASA fakery for real pictures?
Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?
Ok, so I added one there myself (one that those who read The Greatest Liars of All Time will understand)… but the message here is that you cannot tell the difference between what is truth and what is fake, because you have been deceived…
The lyrics continue…
How I wish, how I wish you were here.
We’re just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have we found?
The same old fears.
Wish you were here.
It should be pretty obvious what that lyrical inference is…
Needless to say, the “fishbowl” label matches the model of the universe that we discussed in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology and in What Goes Around, Comes Around…
Now, putting aside fishbowls and domes, let’s take a look at the most famous Pink Floyd lyrics of all…
We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control
First, a look at “education”…
We don’t need no education
So, what is “instruction” then?…
In other words,
Education = The systematic receiving of direct orders
Here’s a fitting clip to illustrate what our “education” system is like, as seen in the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)…
Notice how there is no mention of the word “learning” in the very definition of “education”…
A rather apt description of our schools is as follows:
Thus, children are shaped into compliant drones in school…
…. and then they go on to follow orders the rest of their lives in the system built for them…
This certainly gives extra meaning to the Pink Floyd song “Comfortably Numb”…
People have simply been taught – or rather, socially conditioned, to tacitly accept what they are told by their boss, their military officer, their politicians, or other authority figures as being the truth…
If you think this is ridiculous, check out this 2min video about the famous Milgram experiments, which show the (literally) shocking extent to which most people will obey authority:
Most people will also follow social norms without question, no matter how ridiculous they are, as shown by this simple social experiment:
Authority figures in society – whether they are teachers, politicians, your boss, or scientists, are just puppets projecting “education” onto you…
In other words, these puppets give you direct orders that have been passed down to them to follow, as symbolized in the clip below, which is also from the official music video for Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2):
With that in mind, here is one of the earliest “direct orders” our “education” system is feeding our children…
Any child will believe that the Earth is flat, until they are told otherwise on the very first day of school…
For those who want to learn more about the indoctrination of children with regards to the globe, I highly recommend the video below. It may be 30mins in length, but it will be well worth your time.
To summarize, I think most people would agree that Pink Floyd said it best as pertains to the education system…
Now, let’s look at the second part of those famous Pink Floyd lyrics…
We don’t need no thought control
“Restrict ideas” and “impose opinions” can rather aptly be applied to some of the pictures that you’ve no doubt seen in textbooks growing up…
Not surprisingly, these are literally the first images that pop into your head whenever you hear the words “flat earth”… despite the fact that they are completely false.
Allow me to take a moment to reiterate that definition for you:
The attempt to restrict ideas and impose opinions through censorship and the control of curricula in schools.
Pictures like those you’ve seen above are nothing more than mind control… as they steer people away from the truth and keep them from actually wanting to look into the subject more critically, because it’s ridiculous, right?! …
Of course, anyone who actually does see past the lies to find the truth is subsequently ridiculed by their friends and family who have seen these mind-numbing pictures of what “Flat Earth” supposedly looks like, and obviously “know better”…
It also convinces modern day “intellectuals” to believe that they are the most advanced civilization – because of course, our ancestors must have been primitive if they thought the world was flat… and this then keeps people from actually investigating any real history for themselves.
In essence, we all consider ourselves to be so advanced and well-educated…
… however, with the definition of “education” above in mind, considering oneself to be “well-educated” is nothing more than an admission that one has fully accepted and conformed to the direct orders given by an authority figure without question.
It follows – in the words of Stephen Hawking, that:
With that in mind, it is no surprise then that so-called “intellectuals” – who have jumped through all the hoops and swallowed all the pills – are often those who have the hardest time accepting the truth.
Thus, the reaction from “educated” people to people who question authority is usually something like this…
Nobody likes to hear “the truth” from anyone who isn’t an authority figure, because that’s not how we’ve been programmed in school…
“Political correctness” is thus a very useful tool for those seeking to control populations…
So then, if we’ve been told by our authorities that the Flat Earth looks like this…
… then I’m sure you’re wondering why nobody sails over “the edge”?…
The reason why we don’t fall off the “edge”…
… and (whilst we’re on the subject of “political correctness”…)… pardon me if I sound a bit like this guy…
… is because there is a thick ice wall around the entire Earth that holds all the ocean water in…
… I’m saying that Antarctica actually encircles the Earth, and isn’t just another continent…
…. This is in fact exactly what Pink Floyd was alluding to with their album artwork and music video animation…
Now for a bit of history about Antarctica…
Captain James Cook (1772-1775)
Captain James Cook was reportedly the first to cross the Antarctic Cirlce in 1772-1775.
The second voyage of James Cook 1772–1775, commissioned by the British government with advice from the Royal Society, was designed to circumnavigate the globe as far south as possible to finally determine whether there was any great southern landmass, or Terra Australis.
On his first voyage, Cook had demonstrated by circumnavigating New Zealand that it was not attached to a larger landmass to the south, and he charted almost the entire eastern coastline of Australia, yet Terra Australis was believed to lie further south.
On 17 January 1773, Resolution was the first ship to cross the Antarctic Circle which she crossed twice more on the voyage. The third crossing, on 3 February 1774, was to be the most southerly penetration, reaching latitude 71°10′ South at longitude 106°54′ West.
Cook undertook a series of vast sweeps across the Pacific, finally proving there was no Terra Australis by sailing over most of its predicted locations.
Below is an excerpt from Scientific American: Supplement Volume 48, which describes what Captain Cook encountered – based on his journals:
“In 1774 Captain Cook sailed down into the unknown Antarctic regions, and after terrible hardships reached a spot where he saw a snow-white brightness in the clouds to the south, and he knew he was near the ice fields.
Four hours later he was stopped by a great barreir in latitude 71° South, where the mountains of ice, rising one above the other, tier upon tier, into the distance, were lost in the clouds of the polar sky.
This coast of Victoria Land was a grand scene of glaciers launching their gigantic ends into the sea. From the coastline, where the walls of ice stood as sheer cliffs hundreds of feet high, the mountains inland ranged one over the other, culminating in the volcanic peaks 12,000ft high.”
The full text containing more juicy details can be found below…
… and don’t worry if you don’t have a magnifying glass, as you can find and enlarge this text here.
Captain James Clark Ross (1842) & The Mythical Magnetic South Pole
As mentioned in the Scientific American Supplement above, the ice wall was also charted in 1842 by Sir James Clark Ross – a British Naval Officer and polar explorer who was among the first to venture to Antarctica, in an attempt to determine the position of the South Magnetic Pole (or so they say…).
South Magnetic Pole
Incidentally, we know that the “South Magnetic Pole” is a complete myth, because if it actually existed a compass wouldn’t point towards the north in the southern hemisphere…
As it happens, compasses always point North, no matter where in the world you are…
Thus, a simple compass can single-handedly disprove the model given to us by “science”…
… because if the Earth was a ball with a magnetic field as we’re told…
- compasses in the south would point towards the “South magnetic pole” (as illustrated in orange below); and
- only compasses in the northern hemisphere would point to the northern magnetic pole (as illustrated in yellow below):
What actually happens is that magnets point towards magnetic center on the flat plane…
… because that is the center of the magnetic torus field that you were introduced to in The Torus and Ancient Cosmology… Hence why we have the Northern lights… in the North.
There’s an obvious reason why you’ve never heard of or seen “The Southern Lights”… because they don’t exist as there’s no Southern magnetic pole!
What’s more, the location purported to be the “South Pole”, is actually referred to as the “Ceremonial South Pole” because it isn’t even at the “South pole”…
Why is that then?
… Because if the official story is supposed to hold up, a compass at the exact South (magnetic) pole would be spinning around and around rather than pointing North…
… and as the South magnetic pole doesn’t exist they HAVE to have a “ceremonial” pole at a location said to be different to the “actual” pole, in order to cover up that little secret.
Note also that “science” also tells us that the geographic south pole is different from the south magnetic pole… which is just another ridiculous imaginary concoction dreamed up to perpetuate the lie.
Anyways, back to Sir James Clark Ross – the British Naval Officer who explored Antarctica…
Upon confronting the massive vertical front of ice at Antarctica he remarked (in his journal):
“It was … an obstruction of such character as to leave no doubt in my mind as to our future proceedings, for we might as well sail through the cliffs of Dover as to penetrate such a mass.
It would be impossible to conceive a more solid-looking mass of ice; not the smallest appearance of any rent or fissure could we discover throughout its whole extent, and the intensely bright sky beyond it but too plainly indicated the great distance to which it reached southward.”
For reference, here are what the cliffs of Dover look like…
Sir James Clark Ross and his expeditionary fleet sailed “around” the ice wall for months in “circumnavigation”. Between pit stops at the Cape of Good Hope and his polar expeditions, he spent the next several years of his life “circumnavigating” the southern coast vainly in search of a south sea passage to the other side. (Excerpt from here).
All we at present know is, that snow and hail, howling winds, and indescribable storms and hurricanes prevail; and that in every direction “human ingress is barred by unsealed escarpments of perpetual ice,” extending farther than eye or telescope can penetrate, and becoming lost in gloom and darkness.
Beyond the Ice Wall and Antarctic mountains is anyone’s guess. How far the ice extends; how it terminates; and what exists beyond it, are questions not answered by information in the public domain.
Other famous explorers of Antarctica in recent times include Ranulph Fiennes, as well as Ronald Falcon Scott and Roald Amundsen, so we’re going to take a quick look at them too.
Ranulph Fiennes (1992/1993)
Many naysayers like to point to the explorer Ranulph Fiennes, who according to Wikipedia:
… “undertook numerous expeditions and was the first person to visit both the North and South Poles by surface means and the first to completely cross Antarctica on foot.“
Before believing that story, consider these four points:
- Ranulph Fiennes was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in 1993 for “human endeavour and for charitable services”.
You may recall from Templars Cross, Square and Compass, and The Night Owl, that OBE’s (on the left below) are in the shape of the Templars Cross… which happens to appear on many of the establishments highest awards and medals of honour…
Needless to say, an OBE is nothing more than a title given to the Queen’s biggest liars and criminals… as exemplified by these two chaps…
This isn’t necessarily to say that Ranulph Fiennes likes children, but the fact that he’s been honoured by the Queen does suggest that he’s serving a greater purpose within freemasonic circles.
2. Fiennes’ 2013 mission (where he suffered frostbite) benefited Seeing is Believing, a charity that happens to have one eye as it’s logo…
… a clear reference to The Eye of Horus that you were introduced to in Links to the Ancients…
Incidentally, this charity also has strong ties to Liverpool FC, a club with an extremely occult history that we covered in Festivals of Fire and An Introduction to Synchronicity.
3. As you’ve seen above, the way Captain James Cook and Captain James Clark Ross both described Antarctica would suggest that it would be impossible for anyone to single-handedly “completely cross Antarctica on foot”…
- where the mountains of ice, rising one above the other, tier upon tier, into the distance, were lost in the clouds of the polar sky.
- The desolate grandeur of that icy coast appalled the great navigator, and seeing no possibility of pushing to the pole over those impassable mountains, he contented himself with having gone further than anyone had ever been before, and, he thought as far as any man could go“.
- a grand scene of glaciers launching their gigantic ends into the sea.
- where the walls of ice stood as sheer cliffs hundreds of feet high, the mountains inland ranged one over the other, culminating in the volcanic peaks 12,000ft high.”
- we might as well sail through the cliffs of Dover as to penetrate such a mass.
- It would be impossible to conceive a more solid-looking mass of ice;
4. According to BBC in 2013,
Sir Ranulph Fiennes has pulled out of an expedition across Antarctica during winter because of severe frostbite.
The 68-year-old was injured after a fall while skiing during training at a base camp in Antarctica. He used his bare hands to fix a ski binding in temperatures around -30C.
Does this really strike you as being a mistake an experienced explorer – one who is said to have climbed Mount Everest, single-handedly crossed Antarctica (on foot), and reached the North pole – would make?
Clearly, there are many reasons to doubt Ranulph Fiennes’ Antarctica story.
Roald Amundsen & Ronald Falcon Scott (1911-1912)
The supposed routes to the South Pole taken by Scott (green) and Amundsen (red) in 1911–1912 are shown here:
I won’t go into much detail about their expeditions here, but what is interesting to note is that both Amundsen and Scott were freemasons…
… as is disclosed openly in The Official Journal of the United Grand Lodge of England, Freemasonry Today:
After all we have learned about freemasons thus far in this blog, this should be enough reason to question the legitimacy of those expeditions.
Now, let’s take a closer look at the paths taken by the explorers discussed above.
Here is a map of Captain James Cook’s three voyages, as mapped on a globular map:
Captain James Cook’s route around Antarctica in 1772-1775 is said to have taken 3 years… as mapped onto a globe in this video.
Ferdinand Magellan was apparently the first person to have sailed “around the globe” in 1519-22… followed by Sir Francis Drake (1577-80)…
Notice below that portrayals of Magellan feature a globe and compass, just like Magellan’s other freemason friends… who you’ve seen previously in many previous posts here.
… and here is Sir Francis Drake, doing the customary masonic hand gesture that we discussed in Links to the Ancients, and Templars Cross, Square and Compass, and The Night Owl…
With that in mind, we can see clearly that these guys were in on the big lie perpetuated by the freemasons.
Now, allow me to point out that circumnavigating the world doesn’t mean that one has traveled around a ball…
… it simply means that one has traveled around something…
… which in this case would be like going around in a circle on a dinner plate…
With that in mind, this is what Magellan’s path in 1519-1592 actually looked like:
… and below is Captain James Cook’s journey in 1772-1775 as it would appear on a Flat Earth map:
It should be noted that navigators used to use a map like the one below, along with a sextant, to navigate… and they seemed to find their way around ok…
Interesting that there is no Antarctica on there either…
To round off the first half of this post, let’s take a stab at calculating the circumference of the Earth…
Without having seen the outer limit for ourselves, it’s impossible to make a firm assessment of what the circumference of the world is…
However, we can at least make an educated guess based on some observable data.
There are two simple ways to estimate the circumference.
1) Eratosthenes Method
Eratosthenes method allows us to approximate the diameter of the Earth to be 25,000 nautical miles, which is 28769.5 miles.
Using the formula for the circumference of a circle…
C= 2 π r = 28769.5 x π = 90,330 miles circumference.
2) Gleason’s Map
The Gleason’s New Standard Map of the World (HD version here) shows that 1 degree = 60 nautical miles at the equator (since at the equator the length of the line of latitude equals the length of the line of longitude).
A circle has 360°, so the circumference of the equator is 60NM x 360 = 21600NM.
As you’ll recall from What Goes Around, Comes Around, we can calculate the speed of the sun at the equator simply by dividing that distance by the time it takes for one full rotation, i.e. 24 hours…
So 21600NM / 24 = 900 NM… which is 1035.7 mph… which is identical to the speed NASA tells us that the Earth is spinning at!
Using the same formula as earlier…
…we know that a circle with circumference of 21,600 NM will have a radius of 3,439 NM, which is 3,957 miles…
… which again, is identical to the radius given to us by NASA for the radius of the globe…
…. NASA have apparently simply taken the truth and used it deceptively… to indicate the radius of the globe instead of what it actually is – the distance between the North pole and the equator…
Now, by definition, the equator is the circle that is equidistant from the North Pole and South Pole.
Thus, we know that if the distance to the equator is 3,957 miles, then the distance to the outer edge will be double that… or 7,914 miles…
Now, again using this simple formula…
… we get C = 2 π r = 2 π x 7,914 = 49,728 miles, or ~80,000km.
As mentioned earlier, these are only estimations made using the information we have, and without going to Antarctica ourselves to check where the edge is it is impossible to know for sure how big the Flat Earth is.
That said, the results calculated using the Gleason’s map do match the numbers given to us by NASA (albeit for a deceptive model), as well as seeming reasonable with regard to the sun’s movement, so they are perhaps the likeliest correct answer given the information we have.
Whatever the case, distances in the Southern hemisphere are far too great to match a globe, as you shall see from Albatross Arithmetic below, which actually happens to be one of my personal Flat Earth proofs…
Albatross are one of the only species to circumnavigate the Earth when they migrate… and as you will see in the video below the distance travelled by albatrosses corresponds to the Flat Earth map…
Albatross know! 🙂
That concludes Part 1, but I cordially invite you to swiftly row on over to Another Brick in the Wall Part 2/2 where our little boat adventure continues 🙂
22 thoughts on “21. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2)”
Reblogged this on xtraxtra67 and commented:
Pingback: 23. Destined for Oblivion | THE NARROW GATE
Pingback: 24. Made in a Hollywood Basement | THE NARROW GATE
Pingback: 27. The Stars Declare the Truth | THE NARROW GATE
Pingback: Destroying Gravity by Richard | Plane Not A Planet
You information about the commas is false. The compass always follows the magnetic field lines of the earth which bend in a Toroidal fashion from the magnetic north pole, which is really in the south to the magnetic south pole, which is really in the north. The compass’s North designates the north end of its bar magnetic. Not matter where it is on Earth, as a globe, it will point toward the magnetic south pole which again is in the north. I personally have verified this in the lab.
No mention of the Piri Reis Map, why? It shows an ice free Antarctica with a highly accurate understanding of the Antarctic coastline that has only been verified recently with satellites.
Fyi the indoctrination video author used quotes from the Koran-not a Christian.
Thanks for reading and commenting. I usually try to avoid including videos that show things I don’t agree with, but I decided to include it here anyways as the video as a whole is very good and serves its purpose well in this post.
Very good. I am at least closer to the FE model rather than RE model with a couple of issues yet to resolve (in my heart) through my own research and intuition. The lying part of self appointed authorities, I’ve suspected for a while and confirmed with my own research and testing, yet this was a great reinforcement. I still have some issues with the lunar disc, only because of an anomaly that appears from time to time when a new moon is “rising”. Oddly this anomaly makes the moon disc much larger than after it has fully risen. I have measured it optically and can come up with no real explanation should it be farther away in the horizon than at mid height. Perhaps it is an atmospheric lens effect – I have yet to satisfactorily satisfy myself. There are a few others but more than not I am satisfied with your thread through these posts so far (which I might add is becoming more of a thick solid rope!).
Incidentally, the two lines you dissect from Pink Floyd (We don’t need no education, and We don’t need no thought control) are both grammatical double negatives and therefore lead to the true statement they are telling us that in fact we DO need these two control mechanisms. Regardless of the position of these statements your discussion (argument) still works wonderfully.
I will continue on with Part 2/2!
Thanks Tom! 🙂
Good that you’re testing things for yourself. The moon is a tricky one for sure!
I hadn’t noticed the double negative in the Pink Floyd lyrics, that’s a great observation!
I just have a few questions about the flat earth .
What is the dome made of and how is ti fixed to the earth?
What is the underside look like?
What is surrounding the whole flat earth and dome?
and the million dollar question,who or what made it and why?
Well you do like to ask the tough questions Alan, haha!
Without going to the firmament or underside of the Earth myself I’d only be speculating in answering your first two questions. That said,given that everything in nature behaves according to the magnetic field (as presented in posts 13, 14, and 16) my guess would be that there is a magnetic barrier of some sort. The behaviour of stars, rainbows, and double suns also suggests that the firmament is reflective.
I will be exploring the subject of who made the Earth and why in later posts, but in the meantime you might find it of interest to check out the bible for ideas 😉
Hi there Richard,thanks for the reply but sad to say it is very similar to what I have received from many Flat earthers these last years.All very good at debunking but not at all good coming up with the proof on the very basic foundations of the theory which I think my four questions are fundamental to and like all the others you seem to just skip over them and go on debunking and to bring in religion only proves my point.
Great to have this discussion with you .
Thanks for considering this subject Alan.
There is a lot of proof for Flat Earth (eg. curvature maths, water level, movement of the sun, etc), but we have to be careful not to make claims that we can’t substantiate. The material the firmament and underside of the Earth are made of don’t constitute the “basic foundations”, but are rather the details that require further research.
In the globe model there are MANY questions that still don’t have answers, so it seems incredulous that Flat Earthers are supposed to know EVERYTHING right off the bat. The fact of the matter is that there does remain questions that require further research, but that does not mean that what we CAN prove (eg. lack of curvature) isn’t true.
As for my last point above, I was hesitant to make that statement because I knew it would be interpreted as a reason to write off this whole subject, even though absolutely NOTHING in my Flat Earth posts are religiously motivated. I am an engineer (see the about page), and my work here is based on a calculated and methodical approach, as I would hope you can gather from reading my work.
I’m still reading onwards and trying to grasp your concepts.
Just one issue. Some of your videos don’t work for some reason.
The double negative, I believe serves to reinforce the comment as in the common speech of that particular area of the UK. Pink Floyds music is fabulous and timeless. I believe the subconscious emerges with such truths, especially in music after all it is part of the ‘spectrum’ of vibration.
The FE theory is strangely fascinating and I’m teetering on the edge of belief. It’s quite a ride you’re taking us on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Derek, it’s interesting to follow your comments here 🙂
Unfortunately sometimes videos do get removed from YT for whatever reason which causes them to go down here, but I do upload them to my own YT channel from my own computer (where I’ve saved them) on a case-by-case basis if any when they go down. It would be very helpful if you can please let me know specifically which posts the missing videos are in and I’ll fix that asap
LikeLiked by 1 person
Emily tries but misunderstands
She’s often inclined to borrow somebody’s dreams till tomorrow
There is no other day
Let’s try it another way
You’ll lose your mind and play
Free games for may
See Emily play
Soon after dark Emily cries
Gazing through trees in sorrow, hardly a sound till tomorrow
There is no other day
Let’s try it another way
You’ll lose your mind and play
Free games for may
See Emily play
Put on a gown that touches the ground
Float on a river forever and ever
There is no other day
Let’s try it another way
You’ll lose your mind and play
Free games for may
See Emily play
before you get too hung up on floyd lyrics you should be aware of these incredibly dark floyd lyrics about the effect on the child of ritualistic child abuse, the catatonic effect it has on the victims and the inevitable pagan sacrifice which follows.
140 000 children go missing in the uk every year which are not investigated. how many are sacrificed we dont know.
as you know, the first of may is the prime pagan day of fertility and scarifice to the sun god.
you might also like to know that floyd ere managed by two university dons released from the london school of economics, the breading ground for the likes of soros.
your reference to the albatross and the templar cross made me wonder why samual taylor colridge’s albatross was killed with a ‘cross’bow? not a weapon used aboard ships in those times. a most wonderful work if you are unfamiliar with it. “the rhyme of the ancient mariner”. did he pick up on the same shit as you?
sure, the earth is flat but that map they use is frankly bollox. i dont know how it works but the globists have a strong case and you’ll need a similar one to stand any chance of taking them on.
i worry that the growing main stream support for the idea is going to lead to bad things.
good work though, keep it going.
p.s. i have pretty much every floyd album on vinyl. eat your heart out. i dont know where they stand but clearly have their own demons.
imho, the double negative is a sort of joke as they are being churned out as automatons from the school system indoctrinated but clearly not educated.
i am currently developing an astro-navigation system based on the stationary rather than the wandering astral bodies based on a flat earth model. i have accurate latitude to within 10 miles (good enough for sight of land) but am struggling to get accurate longitude to within 4 degrees. no tables or almanacs required.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge, Richard!
It is breaking my mind.
I was wondering if there is no proof of beyond the white wall ( here in the planet Earth no in GOT). With today technology I think this can be done.
Other question: is the Sun a little bit further than the Moon?
Is this Moon an artificial satellite like David Icke says?
I will continue reading the second part.
I’m surprised you did not mention the ice wall from Game of Thrones. Familiar?
Pingback: The Matrix’s Biggest Lies — Heliocentricity and a Spinning, Rotating, Hurtling Globe Earth (Antarctica) – Taking A Closer Look
Southern lights: Auto australis
You can see then in the southernmost autralian cities.