This post aims to deconstruct the pseudoscience behind the promulgation of the “space” myth.
For anyone new to this blog, or for those simply wishing to refresh their memories, below is a list of posts that are relevant to what will be discussed in this post.
If you are new to this blog you may find it useful to read these (ideally in chronological order) before reading on below, but this post can certainly stand on it’s own without any prior reading as well.
- 16. The Torus and Ancient Cosmology – where a mathematical model of the Universe was derived using magnetism, nature, and mathematics (i.e. sacred geometry, vector equilibrium, and the golden mean/phi). The model matches the model of the cosmos shared by every ancient culture.
- 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time – a study of many of NASA’s lies, including the fake moon landing, along with NASA’s connections to freemasonry and Nazi’s.
- 18. Look Around, it will Astound You – an article where the expected curvature of the globe was calculated, and then compared to reality (to find that we see no curvature). The optics phenomenon of perspective was also outlined.
- 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around – an analysis of the movement of the sun and moon.
- 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby – a debunking of the spinning ball model of Earth provided to us by NASA and scientists.
- 21. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2) – an essay scrutinizing what we know from history about Antarctica, as well as the
- 22. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2/2) – an essay looking at Southern hemisphere flight paths; the legal framework surrounding Antarctic travel; flat Earth propaganda; and disinformation (brainwashing) programmes.
In the last post, 23. Destined for Oblivion, we put to bed the ridiculous myths of gravity and relativity, whilst also exposing the connection between the Royal Society and the Vatican and freemasonry.
In this post, we will deconstruct the pseudoscience that is “Space”.
This post will be quite light on scientific equations, but hopefully that won’t deter you from enjoying a humorous look at some of the finest pseudoscience around.
Note that if you’re the serious type who doesn’t like memes and some laughing, then this probably won’t be your cup of tea. For those who do, here’s what we’ll be reveling in today:
First, you will be introduced to the most prominent public figures promulgating the lies you will learn about in this post.
Secondly, you will need a good dose of humour as we laugh at the idea of a vacuum in space.
We will then scrutinize some of the myths about space travel, followed by a look at why satellites and orbits are utterly impossible.
The biggest laugh will be saved for the end, when you’ll find out about NASA’s latest science project.
Table of Contents
- The Pseudoscience Squad
- The Vacuum
- Vacuum Meets the Atmosphere
- Space Travel
- Tin-foil & Shower Curtains
- Van Allen belt
- August Piccard
- Space Rockets
- Orbits & Satellites
- Low Earth Orbit
- The Thermosphere
- Materials on the ISS & Satellites
- Satellite Hoax
- Space debris
- Hubble Space Telescope
- Low Earth Orbit
- NASA’s Latest Hocus Pocus
Before we start, please watch this 3min video, which will refresh your mind to a few things that we’ve previously discussed, and get you in the right frame of mind for what we’re going to talk about in this post.
In the last post, we put the gravity and relativity myths to bed once and for all.
Following on from there, it’s now time to look at the place no one has ever been to, but that everyone seems to blindly believe in…
No, not that place.
… I’m talking about Outer Space!
^ That’s not actually outer space – it’s a blackboard… but put some white dots on it and it might as well be outer space…
This is what we’re told about space and the Observable Universe:
In other words…
This is what we’re told that “space” and the “multiverse” look like:
A quick 1min visualization of the multiverse:
Has it dawned on you yet that nothing in that video is real?
All it is, is a computer animation… which might as well have been done by this guy for all we know:
Despite being clear animations with a grand total of zero scientific facts to support them, these sorts of videos are passed off as realistic by “scientists”…
… and habitually swallowed whole by children and unsuspecting adults who never think twice about whether or not they do in fact present an accurate story.
The reason why nobody even bothers to think twice, is because it’s a message that has been hammered into us since before we could talk…
… then in (cringe-worthy) cartoons while growing up…
… and repeated in school year after year…
It doesn’t stop after school though, as we’re fed this space propaganda all throughout our lives…
In a nutshell, here’s what our solar system looks like according to “modern science”…
… And don’t forget that the solar system itself is hurling through space at an unfathomable 450,000mph…
If you believe in that insanity, then I’ve got some of the finest snake oil in all of Texas to sell you…
…. And speaking of snakes, allow me to introduce you to…
1. The Pseudoscience Squad
For those who aren’t familiar, this is the team of elite geniuses tasked with saving the world from those crazy people who “ignorantly” question pseudoscience…
The elite team is comprised of the following masterminds, each of whom we will take a brief look at below:
- Carl Sagan
- Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- Michio Kaku
- Paul Zaloom
- Bill Nye
- Brian Cox
- Stephen Hawking
Carl “ladies man” Sagan
This 1min video will offer you a good idea of what Carl Sagan’s pseudoscience is about:
Neil “Snake in de Grass” Tyson
For those who don’t know, according to this genius, the Earth is actually
an oblate spheroid pear-shaped…
The result of his asinine pseudoscience:
It’s certainly also worth noting that he frequently likes to show off his freemasonic priesthood by wearing his helios/sun vest in honour of his pagan sun god…
To get a grasp of what Neil DeGrasse Tyson is like watch the video below (warning: not suitable for overly serious viewers).
Keep in mind how utterly ridiculous spacetime curvature is, as per Nikola Tesla’s words in 23. Destined for Oblivion.
Michio “theoretical physicist super genius” Kaku
Michio Kaku is a self-proclaimed “popularizer of science” and has a NY Times best seller called “Physics of the Impossible“, which, along with bearing a rather fitting title…
… also has some notable symbolism… Namely, a subliminal 6-pointed star, and especially the appearance of Saturn – which will become very significant in future posts:
Note that we also find this star in several other key places; and it is NOT the “Star of David”.
In a nutshell:
As kooky as he is though, he’s right about a couple of things though…
Firstly, as you may recall from 23. Destined for Oblivion, Michio Kaku spilled the beans on Newton’s little secret…
And secondly, here is his rather apt assessment of modern science’s cosmology:
Listen to those words, straight from the horses own mouth:
Think about those words for a minute, and let them sink in…
This is one the biggest “geniuses” of modern science, and he says that modern cosmology is more wrong than ANYTHING in the history of science!
I really couldn’t have said it any better myself!
Needless to say, most of “theoretical physics” has absolutely no bearing on reality…
Speaking of buffoons in lab coats…
Paul “The Clown” Zaloom
The less said the better, really. It’s a crying shame that children worldwide have had to endure this loon.
It should be incredibly alarming that children have grown up getting educated by actors, rather than actual scientists…
… Which brings us to…
Bill Nye “the Science Lie”
This guy is commonly considered the face of “science” due to his “science” show on the Disney channel (which is nothing more than an indoctrination show targeting children)…
Note that he’s usually wearing a lab coat and a bow tie, so he must be smart!…
The funny thing is, he’s actually not a real scientist… but an actor (and a terrible one at that) as you can clearly see in this video featuring clips of him in some (terrible) films in the 80’s and early 90’s:
Can you see what’s going on here?…
Let me spell it out:
- A paid actor is promoted as a “science expert” to kids, despite having zero actual science qualifications;
- An entire generation grow up thinking this fraud is a legitimate and trustworthy scientist;
- 20 years after starting his “science guy” act he’s used as a mouth-piece by the government to publicly push propaganda for the government…
As an example of point 3, you may have noticed Bill Nye voicing strong opinions on “climate change” policy…
… Opinions which aren’t based on ANY actual scientific evidence whatsoever… but rather, only on over-hyped propaganda like Al Gore’s ridiculous movie “An Inconvenient Truth“… which ended up not being so inconvenient after all…
Now, despite all the proof to the contrary, this same “science guy” is now promoting the imprisonment of anyone who questions the climate change hoax*, as shown in the video clip below… (So much for freedom of speech right…)
*By the way, in case any of you still believe the climate change hoax (which we discussed a little bit in 15. Energy Weapons: Tesla’s Suppressed Technologies) consider this:
If our trustworthy governments are so adamant about saving the environment, why then do they keep clean (and free) energy technology like that developed by Nikola Tesla and Ed Liedskalnin out of the public arena?
Could it be that they’re just using “climate change” to get people to buy into the totalitarian totalitarian UN Agenda 2030?… Hmm…
With all that in mind, it shouldn’t really surprise you to see photos like this, where
independent scientists government mouth-pieces / paid actors are cozying up to the leader of the circus himself in the White House…
The video below includes a few clips of Obama and John Kerry lying through their teeth to discredit anyone questioning the government narrative, all whilst weaponizing certain words like “climate change deniers” and “Flat Earthers”,… all in the name of “science”…
All-in-all, Bill Nye is about as trustworthy as an indebted crack dealer if you ask me…
Brian “The British Neil DeGrasse Tyson” Cox
This guy is is the BBC’s favourite “scientist”.
Note that he’s been awarded an OBE (Order of the British Empire) for his faithful service to
the Queen the Vatican…
For more on the Templar’s cross check out 12. Templars Cross, Square and Compass, and The Night Owl and for more on the Vatican roots of “science” see 23. Destined for Oblivion.
Here’s Brian Cox on the cover of a magazine, ramming the globe down people’s throats as usual…
Now, do you think the establishment would have to constantly publish propaganda like this featuring their favourite “expert”
scientists actors if the Earth actually was round?!
Here’s a 2min clip about Brian Cox that rather accurately encapsulate this fraud…
Last but not least, and probably the biggest con of the lot…
Did you know that
- Stephen Hawking was diagnosed with ALS (also called Lou Gehrig’s disease) in 1963;
- It’s very unusual that it would occur in someone as young as he was (23);
- The average survival time of someone diagnosed with ALS is 4 years;
- Stephen Hawking is still here today, 53 years later – meaning that he has set a world record for ALS survival… by several decades.
From the wikipedia article on ALS:
That’s already enough cause to be suspicious, but let’s think about this logically for a second…
Without meaning to be disrespectful to him, it is a known fact that Stephen Hawking cannot talk, or move. He literally cannot even chew food or swallow his tea.
All he can do is sit in his chair, as all his answers come through a computer – which we’re all supposed to believe is connected to his (genius) thoughts and not simply a pre-recorded script being written by someone behind the scenes…
I mean seriously… they might as well have rolled out a teddy bear with a computer attached to it to feed the public lies!
For anyone who wants a bit more information on this ridiculous con, here are two short 6min videos with some more details:
Now, it could be that he’s just a conscious “vegatable” (for lack of a better word) being used, or that the “real” Stephen Hawking died and was replaced by an actor… and I can see the validity of such a theory given that Stephen Hawking today looks like a totally different person…
Whatever the case, this is hardly a case of reliable science.
For what it’s worth, we’ve seen the truth hidden in plain sight on numerous occasions in this blog, so perhaps this Family Guy clip is telling us something as well…
To summarize, despite the fact that this collection of “scientists” are obvious frauds, they’re all paraded out as experts of the universe on “science shows”.
With that in mind, here’s some words of wisdom:
While you’re re-considering where you get your education from, it might also be a good idea to get rid of your tell-lie-vision too…
Before we move on from the Pseudoscience Squad, here’s one final video about psuedoscientists and indoctrination that sums up everything we’ve spoken about up to this point:
Now we’re going to move on from the liars, and onto some of the lies themselves.
2. The Vacuum
This is what pseudoscientists say about “outer space“:
The essential question to consider with regards to that is this:
Now, it should be fairly straightforward to any critical thinker why the vacuum of space is utterly impossible…
…. unless of course you’ve never vacuumed your bedroom (in which case you should go do that now, I’ll wait)…
Simply put, a vacuum (especially one the size of the supposed Universe) can’t exist in tandem with an unprotected atmosphere, for the obvious reason that a “space entirely devoid of matter” will always suck matter towards it…
This shouldn’t really need much more of our time, but for the sake of being thorough (and frankly because it’s a lot of fun to laugh at how outrageous “science” is) let’s take a closer look…
The Vacuum Meets the Atmosphere
Here is what we’re told happens between the Earth’s atmosphere and space:
Does “the definition of space could vary considerably“… and “one might have to extend the boundary to space”… sound like reliable science to you?!
This is pseudoscience at its finest ladies and gentlemen, step right up!
Despite being about as reliable as a pigeon solving a Calculus equation, the Karmán Line (mentioned in the text above) is the “international accepted standard” definition for where space starts:
Now, why do you think they need arbitrary agreed-upon “standards”?
Could it be because this “science” is totally invented?…
After all, if something is actually measurably true, then you generally don’t need to agree on it across numerous countries; it would simply be… you know… true.
Furthermore, here’s what the pseudoscientists say about the nature of their gradual “vacuum“:
Here are those subdivisions of “vacuum quality”:
Why is this “vacuum quality” ridiculous you ask?
Well, because a vacuum will always suck a non-vacuum towards it, if there is no physical barrier…
… and as anyone who has done this to their younger sibling will know…
… there is nothing that is gradual about vacuums!
Well, let me get my catalogue out again for you…
- The 760-25 Torr “Low vacuum” is the most child-friendly vacuum on the market…
- The “Medium vacuum” is best suited for agility…
… as well as multi-tasking…
- The “High vacuum” has more storage capacity, so is best for family-sized homes…
- The purpose-built “Ultra high vacuum” lets you get into those thick rugs and difficult-to-reach places:
… and speaking of “ultra high“…
- The real vacuum expert here though is Grandma Bertie,… She’s got herself the all-powerful “extremely high” vacuum…
… Worth noting that the “extremely high” vacuum is also extremely effective against fire:
- Last but certainly not least, we have the most powerful vacuum of all:
…. The top of the range “Outer Space Vacuum“…
…. Let’s put it to the test shall we…
That video is quite a spectacular knockout blow…
Needless to say, given the way vacuums work… the only way that “space” could work (in the absence of a closed environment) is if:
- there is no vacuum in space, and we have just a continuous atmosphere that extends all the way into “space”… (i.e. an infinite atmosphere with no “space”)
2. the vacuum in “space” rips everything on the surface of the Earth off it.
Problem is, that makes too much sense to be true, and we’re also getting some urgent breaking news…
Well I guess that settles it then!
Not so fast!
Despite making the definitive claim in the headline and first two sentences (beyond which few people actually read) that “scientists have finally pin-pointed” and “found the edge of space”, the same article goes on to openly say that “a lot remains very fuzzy”, with “a host of misconceptions and confusing, conflicting definitions”…
As you can see, this article is a perfect example of how to fool people with pseudoscience:
- To start with, have a catchy headline that pronounces something as fact;
- Re-enforce the headline at the start of the article, with some definitive claims (despite a total lack of factual evidence);
- Fill the article with fluff and matter-of-fact statements that the reader is supposed to assume are correct;
- Talk about how this lie affects other lies to reinforce the larger lie;
- Cite official organizations like FIA and NASA to add a false sense of legitimacy.
It’s all an absolute joke…
… but unfortunately, people will believe anything with the “science” label attached to it…
So in summary:
Here’s one final question about the vacuum that’ll forever remain unanswered…
And on that note, let’s move on to the myth of space travel…
3. “Space Travel”
Propulsion in “Space”
Earlier we saw that space is “the closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum”, with only “a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter” – which is effectively negligible.
Now, here’s a question (about footage from a video like this)…
No oxygen = no combustion.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to conclude that images like the one above are clearly faked with CGI. That ridiculous fake curvature in the background could have told us that too.
Now, what we’re told by scientists is that “most spacecraft today are propelled by forcing a gas from the back/rear of the vehicle”…
That sounds great, but there’s just one problem: Newton’s 3rd law… which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction:
Considering that space is a near-perfect vacuum (with only a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter) – what exactly is it that is providing the “equal and opposite reaction” force to give spacecraft thrust in space?
The answer to this riddle is that this is just a bunch of made up rubbish.
NASA knows this, and that’s why they pump out propaganda like this about imaginary technologies that they say can propel spacecraft without a propellant:
“Microwave thruster system”… Reaaally NASA?
Notice the complex made up words that are just there because they sound cool…
- “classical electromagnetic phenomenon”… Classical? What does that even mean?
- “interaction with the quantum vacuum virtual plasma“… Huh?!
Here’s what wikipedia say about this “RF resonant cavity thruster“…
If even their own inventions violate the “laws” of physics they themselves established, then either the physics is wrong, or they are lying about their inventon (or both)… dontcha think? …
For your reference, here’s a picture of their cavity thruster… which looks like something an 8th grader put together from spare parts in a scrap yard…
Needless to say, this is clearly just a made up technology that can’t work, unless they decide to invent some new pseudo-physics like turning spacetime inside out or something… in which case it would work (albeit only on a blackboard).
Bottom line is, NASA know that they can’t explain the issue of thrust in space, which is why they create propaganda about technology that doesn’t exist that appears to be beyond the layman’s understanding.
In other words, space travel is all a bunch of rubbish.
And speaking of rubbish…
Tin-foil and Shower Curtains
Take a look at the majestic Apollo 11 contraption that allegedly went to the moon…
Here’s a closer look, which shows off all of Apollo 11’s glorious cardboard, shower curtain rails, and tin foil:
If you’re not convinced, here’s another one of NASA’s spaceships that went to the moon:
Judging by the humorous 2min video below, in the 60 years since the Apollo 11 mission NASA still haven’t moved on from using plastic and cardboard on their contraptions…
Now, for the sake of argument, let’s give NASA the benefit of the doubt here, and assume that they did have propulsion systems that worked in a vacuum, and that their tinfoil and shower curtain ships are sturdy enough to fly in “space”…
In order to get to space, they’d need to pass through what they describe as an area of radiation called the “Van Allen Belt”. Let’s take a look…
Van Allen Radiation Belt
As you can see in the illustration above and text below, space agencies tell us that there is a dangerous belt of radiation around the Earth which can damage satellites and spacecraft…
Let’s listen to this NASA engineer explain this phenomena in some more detail…
What an absolute joke.
If they managed to send a cardboard/tin-foil shower-curtain contraption to the moon in 1969, surely issues relating to the Van Allen belt would already have been solved 50 years ago?!
The real reason why they can’t get past the “Van Allen belt”, is because that is actually the firmament, which you were briefly introduced to in earlier posts, including in 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around…
In case you still don’t believe in the Flat Earth model, perhaps you’d find it intriguing to take a look at the account of Dr. Auguste Piccard, who in 1931 became the first man to reach the stratosphere in his high-altitude balloon…
This is a story printed in the August 1931 edition of Popular Science… Yes, in those days the truth wasn’t completely censored from mainstream publications yet…
Auguste Piccard’s balloon mission was actually recently featured in a Hennessy commercial… which is VERY revealing…
The truth hidden in plain sight, as always…
… First the flat horizon at 0:19…
… and then at 0:26, where we see the firmament… immediately followed by “waters above”…
We were also shown something quite interesting at 0:41… but we’ll cover that in a later post.
Now, going back to space travel…
… If NASA haven’t been beyond the Van Allen belt, you may be wondering what has happened to all those rockets that NASA have (allegedly) shot into space…
Contrary to popular conception, these rockets don’t actually go upwards…
Most people don’t know this, because news outlets showing footage of rocket launches always cut footage of rockets before they start to level out and fly horizontally…
Take a look at some of their rocket launches for yourself…
The video below features some entertaining highlights of NASA rocket fails, to show you that their rockets “to space” aren’t as straightforward as Hollywood make it seem…
Note that I’ve just selected an 8min section from the video for the purposes of illustrating the rockets, but I can also recommend watching the rest of the 47min video if you have time as it is well-edited and has some plenty of good material.
With all that in mind, I think this comparisons is rather apt:
Furthermore, isn’t it remarkable, that in over 50 years of “space programs”, the technology allegedly bringing people to space has remained unchanged – in contrast to every single other product or technology?!
You might find the 5min video below interesting, as it shows NASA “astronauts” – along with Obama – publicly contradicting the narrative that NASA have been to the moon…
If you haven’t done so already, I’d also recommend reading 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time, which breaks down many of NASA’s lies and exposes their connection to Nazi’s and freemasons.
If we can’t go beyond low earth orbit, how then NASA can have satellites orbiting other planets, like the Cassini satellite which supposedly took pictures of Saturn? It makes no sense!
Here’s another 3min clip of an “astronaut” lying through his teeth, this time about the lunar eclipse…
These astro-nots aren’t very believable are they…
Whilst we’re on the subject of astronauts…
Have you ever wondered why NASA have orange jumpsuits?…
I’m guessing that you haven’t, but I’ll point out the significance of that anyways…
Orange is a masonic colour.
This is because of gematria, a Babylonian system of computing the numerical value of words based on the values of their constituent letters.
As it happens, “orange” in gematria = 33, which of course is a key freemasonic number.
- O – 6
- R – 9
- A – 1
- N – 5
- G – 7
- E – 5
6 + 9 + 1 + 5 + 7 + 5 = 33
Note that freemasonry is far from being exclusive to the United States, so there are many other nations who have freemasonic space agencies too, for example:
- CSA ASC (Canada)
- ESA (Europe)
- JAXA (Japan)
- Roscosmos (Russia)
- ISRO (India)
- CNSA (China)
Funny thing is, they all put out the same fakery…
For example, here is the chinese space agency’s moon walk… which is clearly done with a combination of CGI and scuba tanks:
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how they do these space walks…
It should be becoming pretty clear that:
Now, again for the sake of argument, let’s be super generous and overlook the fact that NASA’s rockets don’t even fly upwards… (along with all the previous stuff too)…
Assuming that they can reach this mythical place called space, the next question would be regarding orbits…
4. Orbits & Satellites
You know by now that NASA love their pseudoscience and fancy words, and once you are aware of their lies it can be rather amusing to peruse their “scientific” articles on wikipedia…
For example, below is a section from the article on the Vacuum, which talks about satellites in low Earth orbit…
“Atmosphere’s eroded by solar winds”?
This sounds like things someone on an LSD trip would come up with!
Now, as absurd as “solar sails” sound, they don’t come close to measuring up to the absurdity known as “Orbits”…
To get an idea, here is NASA‘s definition of an “orbit”…
Does this sound like anything that you can observe, measure, and repeat for yourself?…
… like say, with two footballs orbiting one another…
Or does this sound like another case of pseudosciencitis?
This is obviously pseudoscience, and so the idea has to be reinforced with subliminal marketing tactics to establish the “legitimacy” of it… Here are just two examples:
To illustrate how absurd the pseudoscience above is, remember from 23. Destined for Oblivion that not even Isaac Newton himself believed that mass could affect mass at a distance…
As NASA said above, “Without gravity, an Earth-orbiting satellite would go off into space…”
Without gravity, this party is over.
And as it happens, we already burst their gravity bubble in 23. Destined for Oblivion, meaning that means that NASA can say bye-bye to their satellites…
But let’s carry on, just to completely unpick this lie.
“Low Earth Orbit”
Satellites are said to orbit in “Low Earth Orbit“, between 160km and 2,000km…
Below is some more information for those who need it.
As an aside, those who’ve read my earlier blog posts may notice the appearance of some familiar occult numbers, which are in fact very common to find all over pseudo-science…
Here for example we see
- 322 (Skull & Bones)
- 9/11 (99=9×11… 9/11)
- 161 (6 is 9, so that has digits of 9/11 too
- 88 (discussed in 3. Leylines: Part 2 in conjunction with the Vatican, Washington DC, Stonehenge, etc).
To point out the obvious, when NASA make things up, they can put whatever numbers they want into the equation… and they like to use their freemasonic numbers A LOT.
The part to pay attention to above is the altitude:
- Low Earth Orbit is (supposedly) between 160km – 2,000km; a range in which all manned space stations are said to orbit.
- ISS is said to orbit at 330km and 435km.
Why is that significant?
Well,… the area from around 85km to around 500km is known as the Thermosphere…
… which as you might have guessed, is called the “thermo“-sphere because it gets very, very hot…
… with temperatures rising to around 2,000 °C (3,630 °F)…
So to reiterate…
… The thermosphere where satellites are said to orbit, can reach temperatures of over 2,000°C. (3,630°F)
Let’s have a look at what satellites and “space ships” are made of shall we…
Material of the ISS and Satellites
The following excerpts are taken from the wikipedia article on the International Space Station, as well as 3 from NASA’s own website:
You don’t need to read all of this, just pay attention to the materials used in the building of the ISS and satellites – as highlighted in yellow.
So basically, their contraptions are mainly made up of aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and bits of plastic, which have the following melting points:
- aluminum – 660°C / 1220°F
- magnesium – 650°C / 1200°F
- titanium – 1670°C / 3,030°F
- plastic – most sturdy plastics melt before 250°C / 500°F
NASA’s own videos also show plastic circuitry on the outside of the space station (which is apparently the reason for space walks…), and plastic circuitry melts at around 100°C / 210°F.
Now, remember that the thermosphere – where satellites and all manned-LEO craft are said to reside – can reach over 2000°C / 3,630°F…
So Aluminum melts at 660°C, but the temperature of the thermosphere where they supposedly orbit is 2000°C…
Clearly, this is a problem…
… But of course, as with all things, NASA has a pseudo-scientific excuse…
To deconstruct this lie, we will borrow some text from APlaneTruth, who has done a good job explaining how ridiculous the pseudoscience above is:
In short, satellites would have to absorb the heat in the thermosphere (that comes from the sun), otherwise the 2nd law of thermodynamics is broken.
For anyone who wants to look into this more, I can recommend watching this 34min video:
The 6min video below does a good job illustrating the problem with satellites and heat transfer, and it also introduces a couple of other aspects of satellites that we will take a look at below.
As mentioned in the video above, there are 1000’s of miles of undersea fibre-optic cables used for communication purposes…
… but note that this is a more accurate representation:
What about GPS?
First off, the term “Global” Positioning System is rather disingenuous. The software might tell you where you are on a computerized model of the Earth if it was a ball – but that does not make the globe true.
For example, someone could write a software program that would tell you where you were if the Earth was a pyramid, but that doesn’t mean that the Earth actually is a pyramid. Same goes for a ball.
Secondly, the “satellite” technology used for “GPS” systems are actually based on ground-based technology that was invented in World War 2, called LORAN:
The existence of thousands of radio masts should tell you something after all…
In a nutshell, LORAN existed and was used for navigation before satellites were even invented.
Modern phones and so-called “Sat-Navs” are simply getting signals from radio masts, which are digitally programmed to “pretend” to be satellites.
Haven’t you ever wondered how a “Sat-Nav” can pick up a signal in one place, but not another?… That really is a dead-giveaway that “Sat-Nav’s” receive signals from radio towers and not satellites.
The way that “Sat-Navs” work is essentially no different than the way “cell-phones” work with ground-based radio towers:
The video below is quite a technical study of “satellites”, and shows that a receiver is simply receiving a signal that has been arbitrarily assigned the number of a “satellite” by a computer system.
Thus it will seem as if the receiving system is picking up signals from different satellites, when in fact the signal is simply being received from ground-based towers that send out a “digital signature” of a given imaginary satellite.
So to summarize:
- If we have fibe-optic cables all over the world,… Why would we need satellites?
- Ground-based location tech like LORAN is still in operation,… so why do we need satellites?
For those who are still skeptical, I can inform you that there are also technologies being used by the military for communication purposes many of which could easily replicate what we believe satellites do.
There’s also talk of having drones and balloons providing internet in remote places… but why exactly would this be necessary if satellites exist?
Again, it doesn’t add up…
Given that all the functionalities that satellites are said to provide, can – and are – provided by ground-based technology, it doesn’t even make sense from a financial point of view to put satellites in “orbit”. There’s just no way that that would be cost-effective.
Now, going back to orbits, there’s another big issue with satellites in space, and that is space debris…
Consider that the ISS is said to orbit at 17,150mph.
NASA‘s website says that there are more than 500,000 pieces of space debris being tracked – and that doesn’t even account for debris that is un-tracked…
Some simple questions:
- Do you think it is realistic for them to track 500,000 tiny pieces of debris?
Debris is by definition junk that originates elsewhere in the solar system, or has fallen off other satellites (supposedly).
They’d have to have some serious spy tech to track every tiny piece of debris in an area such as the thermosphere…
- Is it really possible to notice if a screw has spontaneously fallen off the outside of a satellite?
- Do you think they would have time to respond if a screw approached their space ship at 17,500mph?
Needless to say, a single tiny piece of “debris” travelling at 17,500mph would puncture any satellite or space station, sucking everything on-board out into the vacuum.
- Given that propulsion in space is a myth, how could they even respond? It’s not like they can magically drive out of the way of the incoming debris.
In case you’re not convinced yet, let’s do a little reality check with regards to satellites…
Satellite Reality Check
Isn’t it funny how we’ve never seen a photo of Earth showing all the thousands of satellites that are supposedly in orbit around it?
Here are a couple of other questions to consider relating to satellites and the ISS:
Have you ever seen video footage or photos of
- the ISS being constructed?
- a satellite being put into orbit?
- a rocket docking with the ISS?
- an astronaut going from a rocket into the ISS?
- a 360 degree video of astronauts (showing the so called “4th wall” as movie producers call it)?
Fact is, you will never find any of the above, except for in Hollywood movies!
Satellites are quite clearly a total and absolute joke.
In case anyone is hungry, here’s some ice cream…
“But, but, but I can see the ISS in the sky…”
Well now, think about how small an airplane is when you see it in the sky at 38,000ft (about 7 miles) up.
… Then consider that a satellite is about the size of a school bus, which is about 1/10th the size of an airplane (to be generous)…
The ISS is said to be at 200-400 miles up…
Needless to say, anyone who claims to have seen something the size of a school bus that far away with their naked eye is just flat out lying.
As for amateur astronomers who claim to see it… what do they really see?…
As you will see in a later post, holographic technology is very real, and way more advanced than most people can imagine.
I won’t go into more detail on the matter here, but for those who are interested in checking this out more, below are two videos on the subject you could start with. I’d also recommend looking into Project Blue Beam.
Let’s now turn our attention to another object said to be miraculously floating in the sky…
The object we’re going to scrutinize is the Hubble Space Telescope…
Hubble Space Telescope
“Space telescope”… “vital research tool”… “one of NASA’s Great Observatories”…
A more accurate description of what you see above would be:
Hubble Telescope: “A giant toilet paper roll, wrapped in tin-foil, with a set of ironing boards attached with curtain rails. Opens with a bin lid.”
Funny how NASA has pictures of distant galaxies, but we don’t have a single “non-composite” (i.e. CGI) photo of the Earth, nor any video footage of the Earth spinning…
Lest anyone has forgotten (from 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time), NASA love a bit of photoshop too, as you can clearly see below…
Note that you can replicate this yourself… Simply go to NASA’s website, take ANY picture of the Earth, open it in photoshop, and adjust the levels to reveal a copy-pasted box around Earth…
And speaking of problems…
Back to Hubble…
Here are the words of Edwin Hubble, who the Hubble Telescope is named after:
In other words, it doesn’t matter if the Flat Earth model is true… because “it is unwelcome and would be accepted only as a last resort“…. “therefore, we disregard this possibility and consider the alternative”, because a Flat Earth would be a “horror“.
“The unwelcome supposition of a favoured location (i.e. Flat Earth) must be avoided at all costs“.
Modern science pretty much make it up as they go along, with the stated aim of disregarding the truth “at all costs”.
And on that note, let’s take a look NASA’s latest science project…
5. NASA’s Latest Hocus Pocus
If you think flying toilet paper rolls and shower-curtain contraptions are ridiculous, wait till you find out about what NASA are working on now…
“Space Poop Challenge”
(This is not a joke).
This is the announcement from NASA’s own website, published just 2 months ago:
This Telegraph article does a particularly good job of explaining the alleged challenges of “space pooping” if anyone is interested.
Here is NASA’s own video, where someone has kindly highlighted many of the lies for us:
As usual, the mainstream media propaganda machine is ramped up to the max, churning out this
So basically, NASA expects us to believe that despite the fact that they have an annual budget that is larger than most countries (see below), they aren’t capable of figuring out how to keep an astronaut from soiling themselves…
Looks like nothing more than a particularly *crappy* PR campaign…
… Anything to keep NASA in the headlines and keep the hoax going though right…
It’s also testament to how brainwashed the public is when NASA can spew out ridiculous things like this without anyone so much as opening a window…
Personally, I can’t decide which of these is more full of s***…
(Yes, I’m available for stand-up comedy gigs at birthday parties and corporate functions…)
A fitting commercial perhaps…
And on that note, it looks like we’re out of material…
Allow me to offer a quick summary of what we’ve covered.
1. The Pseudoscience Squad
- The “scientists” you see on TV are nothing more than freemasons and paid actors.
2. The Vacuum
- the Vacuum and un-shielded atmosphere cannot co-exist;
3. Space Travel
- there is no way for spacecraft to create thrust (i.e. propulsion) in a vacuum;
- NASA themselves admit to never having been past the Van Allen belts;
- NASA openly contradict themselves by saying that they’ve never been beyond low-earth orbit;
- NASA rockets never seem to fly upwards, but instead always level out into horizontal flight path relative to the ground;
- Dr. Auguste Piccard was the first man in the stratosphere, and described what he saw as “It seemed [like] a flat disc with upturned edges”;
4. Satellites & Orbits
- Orbits are not repeatable as per the scientific method, so is clearly pseudoscience;
- the temperature of the thermosphere means that satellites would quickly melt;
- GPS can work without the use of satellites by using ground-based technology that pre-dates the invention of satellites;
- A tiny piece of space debris could destroy satellites; yet this seems to be largely ignored;
- The Hubble Space Telescope is a giant toilet paper roll.
5. Other Hocus Pocus
- NASA have recently hit new heights with regards to the ridiculousness of their space propaganda, with the “Space Poop Challenge”.
Thus far, we have covered NASA’s lies; the impossibility of the spinning ball; the gravity myth; along with the lies about “outer space”.
- NASA’s lies (including moon landing hoax) – 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time
- Spinning ball lie – 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby
- Gravity myth – 23. Destined for Oblivion
Effectively, the mainstream model of the Universe and solar system has been nuked to oblivion…
And with that done, in the next post we will turn our attention to why this space lie has been promulgated… and later we also take a look at what the magnificent stars in the night sky above us really are…
To be continued…
Read more of The Narrow Gate
This blog is written like a book, so if you enjoyed this article, check out the Introduction page as well as Table of Contents where you can find a chronological list of all material on this site, including short summaries of every article.
You can also navigate via the Start menu in the header:
Sharing is Caring!
If you like what you’re reading, please share far and wide!
Note that this site is not monetized. My only gain is to see more people waking up to the truth.
Please help wake others up by sharing links to this site on social media (eg. facebook groups, twitter, reddit, etc). Thanks in advance! 🙂
Follow The Narrow Gate
Join me on social media, don’t be shy!
- Friend me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/richard.kallberg
- Like The Narrow Gate Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/TheNarrowGateWeb/
- Follow me on Twitter: @RichardKallberg
For automatic email updates to alert you when new posts are published, simply subscribe by clicking on the “Follow” button which appears on the bottom right on this page when you scroll upwards slightly:
15 thoughts on “24. Made in a Hollywood Basement”
Pingback: 23. Destined for Oblivion | THE NARROW GATE
Pingback: Table of Contents | THE NARROW GATE
Pingback: 25. Exposing the Coming NWO Alien Deception | THE NARROW GATE
Bro! You gotta show them sending up “satellites” attached to a helium balloon….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great presentation. I actually enjoy the humour – the guy clapping with the open mouth (is that you Richard?) had me LOLing uncontrollably for several minutes… The Carl Sagan (Billions etc) and Brian Cox (Stoned) almost make the lying gits endearing. The ‘Vacuum’ section was also entertaining from the little sis’ trick to Grandma Bertie (hilarious) I like the ‘toilet-tele’ jpg and the heinz beans ad. The Edwin Hubble memes tell the whole tale. So keep up the humour cos’ it seems to tone down the frustration and anger that the shock of enlightenment can bring. Anyway don’t they love to mock us…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, awesome work, thank you! Haven’t gone through it all yet, so saving for later and sharing on Facebook. Shalom
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: 27. The Stars Declare the Truth | THE NARROW GATE
Well, if i or any human with his tiny brain try to figure out the size and depth ot the expanse out there go for it.
Prove that God and the story of genesis is not the God of creation and He is not all knowing. He is not the Alpha and Omega.
I have to accept His constitution chronology dateing back to the bible as who knows when and where this all started and ended if there is a beginning and ending apart that of the creator himself.
At the moment there are no other choices to choose from that show that any ideals of man works. And works in favor of himself. Not one thing works in favor for man. This has to be an individual choice. Believe it or or not.
For the undersea fiber optic cables you have the first graphic showing a line that goes from the southern tip of South America to New Zealand and yet it is missing on the second. Why is that?
Again the Electric Universe sees most mainstream scientists as conducting pseudo science. You have the correct problem in my opinion, but you have the wrong answer. It is not that the world is flat, it is that the universe is electric just as Tesla said. Check it out bro. You are a really smart guy. They could use your thinking and communication skills in the Electric Universe movement. You have so many pieces of the puzzle but somehow you have a couple in the wrong place that is all.
A lot of links to pictures and some vids do not work, could you look into this and update it?
> No oxygen = no combustion
The following two links talk about rockets carrying with them hydrogen and oxygen. These two elements are then combusted together to produce thrust. Am I understanding rocket design correct?
> What exactly is it that is providing the “equal and opposite reaction” force to give spacecraft thrust in space?
Once a rocket is in outer space, the thrust comes from the rocket engine throwing the propellant out the back at high speed.
Consider this experiment. Put on skates. Stand up. Move to a level surface and come to stand still. Pick up something heavy. Point skates in the same direction. Verify that you are not moving due to wind or an unlevel surface or some other force. Throw the heavy object away from you while maintaining your balance. Notice how you travel backwards while the heavy object travels forward.
This shows how Newton’s 3rd law works. The action of throwing the heavy object forward causes your body to go backwards.
Hi again, It is quite hard to sink in that gaia might not be a globe after all. There was also a bit thoroidal map, signed as biblical, which was really interesting. There is more possibilities to the question of earth’s shape than flat or round. Even though the money makes world go round :D. Only critics I have to make at this point is that roughly half of the pics don’t work anymore so many of the demonstrations get halfway presented. Also I am interested in translating to finnish language if you still want to upgrade an go on.
Pingback: The Matrix’s Biggest Lies — Heliocentricity and a Spinning, Rotating, Hurtling Globe Earth (Satellites and Balloons) – Taking A Closer Look
Everyone knows NASA runs the Flat Earth psyop.
Outer space is not a real place but that does not make the impossible real. The Earth is obviously not flat.
LikeLiked by 1 person