The aim of this post is to present an accurate and comprehensive picture of what the stars are and how they move in the night sky, as simple observation tells us that they are not at all what NASA tell us that they are.

It is also my hope that this post may inspire you to look upon the night sky with new eyes and with renewed child-like curiosity.

 

 

 

Note to new readers:

If you are new to this blog, please note that this is article #27 in a series of articles that have been presented as a chronological and logical narrative.

That being the case, you may find it useful to read from the start (follow the links in the header above), or to at least check out the Table of Contents page for a “spark-notes” summary of previous material discussed in this blog, before continuing here. The recap below might also offer some useful guidance.

 

Recap

This post will build upon material presented in earlier posts, particularly what was presented in Post #16 through to Post #24.

Here is a quick summary to refresh your memory of what was covered in those posts:

 

• 16. The Torus and Ancient Cosmology – where a mathematical model of the Universe was derived using magnetism, nature, and mathematics (i.e. sacred geometry, vector equilibrium, and the golden mean/phi). The model matches the model of the cosmos shared by every ancient culture.

    

 

• 17. The Greatest Liars of All Time – a study of many of NASA’s lies, including the fake moon landing, along with NASA’s connections to freemasonry and Nazi’s.

 

• 18. Look Around, it will Astound You – an article where the expected curvature of the globe was calculated, and then compared to reality to find that we see no curvature. The optical phenomenon of perspective was also outlined.

      

 

• 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around – an analysis of the movement of the sun and moon, including time zones, seasons, solar analemma, tides, and much more.

   

 

• 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby – a debunking of the spinning ball model of Earth provided to us by NASA and scientists.

  

 

• 21. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 1/2) –  an essay scrutinizing what we know from history about Antarctica, featuring symbolism from the music industry as well as a look at the education indoctrination system.

   

 

• 22. Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2/2) – an essay looking at Southern hemisphere flight paths; the legal framework surrounding Antarctic travel; globe propaganda; and disinformation (brainwashing) programs.

  

 

• 23. Destined for Oblivion, we put to bed the ridiculous gravity and relativity myths, whilst also exposing the connection between the Royal Society and the Vatican and freemasonry.

   

 

 

The most pertinent material to bear in mind when reading this post is what you learned in 24. Made in a Hollywood Basement. 

In that post you were introduced to some of the most famous pseudoscientists themselves…

  

 

… after which we scrutinized what they say about the mythical place called “Outer space”,… and in so doing we learned that “space” is nothing more than an elaborate hoax produced using CGI and an enormous amount of pseudoscientific lies.

   

 

In a nutshell, what we have learned so far is this:

 

 

 

Preface

This post will pick up where we left off in 24. Made in a Hollywood Basement as we will seek to answer the following question:

 

If outer space is a myth, what then, are the stars that we see in the night sky?

 

This post will be very visual, and will feature numerous videos that will assist in clearly illustrating many of the things that will be discussed, as words alone cannot do enough justice to certain elements of what we’ll discuss.

Some of the videos are slightly longer than the videos you will usually find in this blog, but do note that each one has been carefully selected for your viewing pleasure and to illustrate certain points as accurately and as thoroughly as possible.

 

As you can see in the Table of Contents below, we will start our journey through the stars by deconstructing some of the lies we’ve been told about stars.

We’ll then look at what the stars actually are, before analyzing the movement of the stars in the night sky for further clues about what is going on in the sky above us.

 

Table of Contents

Introduction

1. What We’ve Been Told
   • The Sun
   • Gravity
   • Thermonuclear Fusion
2. The Real Stars
   • What Stars Actually Look Like
   • Frequency of the Heavens
3. Parallax
   • An Advanced Course in Pseudoscience
   • The Missing Parallax
4. Star Trails
   • Introduction to Star Trails
   • Star Trails vs The Spinning Globe
   • Star Trails Explained: Part 1
5. The Astrolabe
   • Introduction to the Astrolabe
   • Geo-metry
   • The Nautical Mile
6. The Astroplate
   • Dome Reflection
   • Star Trails Explained: Part 2

Conclusion

Word Count: 6,300

 

---

 

Introduction

 

Have you ever just sat and dreamily looked up at the stars?

 

 

 

 

Chances are, if you’re below the age of 30, you’ve spent more time doing this…

 

 

 

 

… than this:

 

 

 

With that in mind, what do most of us really know about the stars beyond what we’ve been told?

 

 

Ironically, one of the pseudoscientists on who’s account we have shared a few laughs in earlier posts perhaps said it best:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What do you say then, shall we un-bamboozle ourselves and check out the Universe as it really is?…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

1. What We’ve Been Told

To begin, let’s do a step-by-step deconstruction of what we’re told that the stars are…

 

The Sun

 

To start with, here is the Google definition of a star:

 

Now, do you really think that the Sun looks anything like the stars in the night sky?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keep it mind what we learned in 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around… that is, that the sun is certainly not a ridiculous 93 million gazillion miles away…

 

 

This is what wikipedia says about stars…

 

So, despite the fact that the sun and stars look nothing alike to the naked eye, we’re told that the sun is a star…

… and what’s more, we’re told that it is a “luminous sphere of plasma” that looks like this…

 

 

However, any five year old with eyes will tell you that the picture of the “sun” presented to us by NASA looks nothing like the sun that we actually see in the sky:

 

    

 

Needless to say, the sun is quite obviously not a gigantic exploding fireball!

 

We will cover what is most likely going on with the sun in a later post, but for now we will keep our focus on the stars themselves.

 

What’s important to note here, is that the sun and stars are different from one another – as we can clearly observe with our own eyes.

 

Gravity

As they do with everything else, “science” tells us that what holds the stars together here is the magical force called “gravity”…

 

Going back to what we learned in 23. Destined for Oblivion, this is quite simply just another example of where “gravity” is used as the defacto explanation for how something works…

… just as it is used to explain

• How the Earth can orbit the sun;
• How the moon can orbit the Earth without drifting off into space;
• How satellites the size of a school bus can levitate in mid-air above our atmosphere without falling down;
• How 321,000,000 cubic miles of seawater can stick to a spinning ball whilst letting a helium balloon float upwards;
• How water can curve around, and stick to, a spinning ball (despite the fact that water always finds its level);
• Why we don’t fly off when the ball spins;
• Why people and water can stick to the underside of a ball;
• etc… etc… etc…

 

 

 

If anyone reading this still believes in “gravity”, please read 23. Destined for Oblivion, which thoroughly deconstructs the gravity myth, and also exposes the connections between the Vatican and freemasonry and the Royal Society – where the gravity myth originated.

 

For the purpose of eliminating the myth that gravity is responsible for stars, it might be useful to remember what Isaac Newton himself thought about gravity and action-at-a-distance…

 

 

Long story short, “gravity” is clearly the gift that keeps on giving for the freemasonic liars… despite being based solely on imagination and fancy equations that bear no relation to reality.

 

And speaking of things that bear no relation to reality…

 

 

Thermonuclear Fusion

 

This is what pseudoscientists tell us about what makes stars appear bright in the sky:

 

Here’s a colourful illustration, courtesy of NASA…

 

   

 

 

In other words…

 

 

If the sun really is as far away (93 million miles) and as hot (15 million °C) as they say it is, then who in their right mind would ever claim to know what the inside of it was made of?

 

… That is, unless of course astronauts are fire-proof and have themselves been to their exploding sun to check…

 

 

You should be well-versed in NASA’s lies by now, but here is another one… this one about how stars form, taken from NASA’s website:

 

 

 

Here’s a short summary of how stars are “born” according to pseudoscientists:

 

 

 

In other words…

 

A huge cloud (that none of us have never seen before)…

… somehow collapses in on itself (in a way nobody has ever replicated on Earth)…

… because of “gravity” (which nobody has ever proven to exist, as shown in 23. Destined for Oblivion)…

… and it becomes hotter (which nobody has ever measured)…

… and nuclear reactions (which we have no way of verifying) take place…

 

… and voilá, a star is born…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The best part is, NASA even have some amazing footage of stars to support their amazing science…

… like this footage of an exploding star (1min)…

 

 

… and here is a quick 1min video taken from the NASA Goddard YouTube channel which shows what a black hole “shredding” a passing star supposedly looks like…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The main take-away from this section, is that what we’re told about stars is a complete lie, based on nothing more than CGI and pseudoscience.

 

Before we move on, here’s a quick 3min video showing NASA astronauts actors clearly contradicting themselves with regards to whether or not it’s possible to see stars in outer space…

 

 

 

Now, let’s move on to another aspect concerning the stars that annihilates the accepted worldview of the stars…

 

 

---

 

2. The Reality of the Stars

What Stars Actually Look Like

 

First, to remind you, this is a “photo” of what NASA wants you to believe is a star:

 

 

… but what do we actually see if we look at the stars in the sky with a telescope or camera?…

 

  

 

 

Take a look at this 8min video… and decide for yourself if what you are seeing are giant spheres of gas billions of light years away… or if they look more like something… magnetic…

 

 

 

As you can see, what we see in the sky has absolutely no relation to the sun… nor to what NASA tell us the stars look like…

 

 

 

Here are some still shots for your reference (though as you can see they don’t really do justice to what we see in videos)…

 

 

 

For those who want to see more videos of the stars, you can find hundreds of videos of the stars on YouTube that will show the same thing as in the video above… here are just a few examples…

 

Personal Footage

Now, some might say that all the videos of stars on YouTube are fake or photoshoped… which is a reasonable claim to make.

To check to see if what those videos were showing is accurate I checked for myself using my own telescope and a camera… and what I’ve personally seen is that the videos above show an accurate picture of the stars.

I didn’t manage to capture great footage to do justice to the stars (due to my limited camera skills and lack of a tripod), but despite the poor quality, my videos do show enough to show that what you can see in the video above is real.

For reference my videos are in this playlist, but remember what I’ve said about quality.

 

Below is a photo I took of a random star. The picture obviously isn’t an accurate depiction of the shape of the star due to the exposure and lack of a tripod, but nonetheless you can clearly see the amazing array of colours this star exhibits.

 

 

 

If you pay close attention to the stars in the night sky you can even notice certain stars changing colours as they twinkle – even with your naked eye!

The star Sirius is especially bright and colourful for example.

 

Anyways, now that we’ve seen what the stars look like, let’s take a look at how the stars appear the way they do…

 

 

Frequency of the Heavens

As you will come to understand in the videos below, the stars seem to appear the way they do due to several scientific phenomena, namely:

• Cymatics – the study of how sound affects matter.

• Sonoluminescence – the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound.

• Superconductivity – a phenomenon of exactly zero electrical resistance and expulsion of magnetic flux fields occurring in certain materials when cooled below a characteristic critical temperature.

• Quantum levitation – a phenomena relating to equilibrium whereby a superconductor in a magnetic field will expel a magnetic field inside of it, and thus bend the magnetic field around it.

 

This probably sounds like a bunch of big complex words, but rest assured that we aren’t going to be covering any complex equations here.

 

The main thing to note in this section – is that everything relates to two things: SOUND and MAGNETISM.

 

It is by no means required, but you may find that you get more out of the content below after reading the following blog posts which introduced the principles of cymatics and magnetism:

•  1. Secrets of Cymatics, DNA, and Egyptians, which introduces the subject of Cymatics and shows some interesting connections to Nikola Tesla, DNA, and the Giza Pyramids.

• 13. Magnetism: Tesla’s Key to the Universe – a study of Ed Liedskalnin’s magnetic motor at Coral Castle, as well as the naturally-occuring magnetic principles it is based on.

• 14. Crop Circles and Ancient Power Plants – an article exposing the phenomenal amount of magnetic power found in nature, that both Nikola Tesla and ancient cultures knew about.

     

 

 

Now, instead of boring you with long and drawn-out scientific explanations about the sciences listed above, I will leave you to watch the three videos below, which will graphically explain the science behind the stars more colorfully than any words can…

 

• A 5min video showing you what sonoluminescence and cymatics are:

 

• This 15min video illustrates the connection between what the stars look like and cymatic frequencies:

 

• This 18min video illustrates the principles of superconductivity and quantum levitation in relation to sonoluminescence:

 

Hopefully the videos above have sparked some curiosity and given you a grasp of what the stars are.

If you want to see more on any of the subjects discussed I recommend doing a keyword search for “cymatics stars” or “sonoluminescence stars” on YouTube, as there are plenty of awesome videos on these subjects.

 

 

We will look more at the stars themselves in another post, but for the rest of this post we will be studying their movement, starting with a deconstruction of another one of NASA’s lies: Parallax.

 

 

---

 

3. Parallax

Note that this section might get a little technical, but don’t be put off if you don’t immediately understand, as there are a couple of short videos a little further down that will probably make more sense than the text here.

 

An Advanced Course in Pseudoscience

 

Let’s first define what this is:

 

To give you a better idea, below is an animated example of parallax, borrowed from wikipedia.

As the viewpoint moves side to side, the objects in the distance appear to move more slowly than the objects close to the camera.

 

Here is how wikipedia describes parallax:

 

Below is a simplified illustration of the parallax of an object against a distant background due to a perspective shift.

When viewed from “Viewpoint A”, the object appears to be in front of the blue square. When the viewpoint is changed to “Viewpoint B”, the object appears to have moved in front of the red square.

 

“Scientists” and modern “astronomers” claim that they can use parallax to measure distances between stars…

 

 

If one does a google image search for “parallax” what appears is a mountain of images like the one above…

 

 

 

In other words, nice pictures, but nothing that has any substance…

 

 

This is also what we find on two NASA websites when searching for “NASA parallax”…

• http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/teachers/attachments/parallax.html
• http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/parallax.html

 

 

This tells us absolutely nothing practical, so then we do a google search to try to find a more detailed explaination for parallax…

… and what we find is this “advanced” course:

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys440/lectures/helio_para/helio_para.html

 

The site teaches some basic trigonometry, and other mathematical equations – but again, nothing practical in terms of measuring actual stars in the sky…

 

It turns out that after teaching this “advanced” mathematics … we are presented with this conclusion… or “The bottom line” as they call it.

 

Here is this text magnified a bit for those who don’t have the eye-sight of a hawk:

 

 

 

Do you see what just happened?

 

 

After all that complex maths stuff, we’re told that a magical satellite has mapped out the distances for us…

 

In other words… “Advanced” courses like this one teach complex maths that can verify the numbers provided by scientists, but they don’t teach how to verify those distances by actually looking at the stars…

Needless to say, the numbers provided to us have absolutely nothing to do with reality!

 

The truth is that you personally have no way of measuring the distances they’ve told you…

… but fortunately “a large team of scientists” have done all the hard work for you…

 

 

 

So let me see if I got this right…

“Scientists” put a tin can called Hipparcos (pictured below) into space, and it somehow mapped out the precise position of 118,200 stars…

… and we’re all supposed to trust all of these distances because we’ve been given some fancy equations…

 

 

 

Clearly, parallax is yet another example of pseudoscience that has no bearing on reality…

 

 

For an excellent study on how astronomers could be so wrong, check out this article:

• https://aplanetruth.info/2016/12/10/how-did-the-kings-of-astronomy-get-it-so-wrong-part-i-copernicus-newton/

 

The Missing Parallax

Clearly, apart from the fact that we have no way of verifying the distances we’re given (which are usually in the billions and billions of light years…), why do parallax equations have no relation to reality?

 

Well, if the Earth is

• spinning at over 1,000mph;
• orbiting the sun at 66,600mph; and
• moving with the solar system at 483,000mph

 

… then the logical question to ask is this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Quick Tangent

Those who have read 26. Gematria, Synchronicity, and Predictive Programming will appreciate the significance of the name of the satellite that maps the distances we’re given – “hipparcos”, and “parallax” in gematria…

 

---

 

Back to the stars though…

 

 

 

 

This is a useful 1min video to watch to visualize the problem with “parallax”…

(Note: You might want to turn your volume down as the music is quite heavy!)

 

 

 

The simple fact is that parallax has never been observed between the stars, as they all move in unison, as you can see in this gif:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now then, if the stars are moving in unison, what conclusion can we make?…

 

 

 

Hmm…

 

If all the stars are moving in unison,… could it be that they are all spinning together at the same height or as part of the same structure?…

 

…Perhaps a little something like this:

 

 

 

The animation above is made from this 4min video, which includes some useful animations of the stars and movement of the sun and moon, and it’ll also introduce our next sub-topic: star trails…

 

 

 

---

 

4. Star Trails

The movement of the stars is undoubtedly one of the trickiest elements to figure out with regards to the Flat Earth, so please bear with me in the next 3 sections as things might not be clear until you get the full view of things by the end.

 

Introduction to Star Trails

As usual, the definition first:

 

 

Here’s a particularly resplendent star trail photograph captured in Indonesia earlier this month, as presented on the BBC:

 

 

Now, the reason why this is a tricky one to figure out is because the stars in the Northern “hemisphere” and Southern “hemisphere” appear to be spinning in opposite directions…

The opposing spins is illustrated by the time-lapse photograph of the stars in the night sky at the equator (looking East) below, which shows:

• half of the stars appear to be travelling anti-clockwise (those north of the equator), and
• half of them appear to be travelling clockwise (those south of the equator)…

Note that this perfect symmetry only happens at the equator.

 

To help visualize this better, here is a time-lapse video showing the star trails at the equator.

 

Now, at first glance, the fact that the stars appear to spin in different directions in the northern “hemisphere” compared with the southern “hemisphere” suggests that the model below is totally wrong… given that everything is spinning in the same direction here:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I guess the globe is right then… because it can (supposedly) explain why the stars appear to spin in opposite directions from the viewers perspective…

 

 

 

 

 

Hang on a second, let’s think about this in a bit more depth instead of just accepting the first solution presented to us by the clowns shall we…

 

 

 

Star Trails vs The Spinning Globe

 

There are many problems with the spinning globe model relating to how the stars move.

To start off, here are some interesting points from the video shown earlier (the one at the end of section 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In other words…

 

If this is how the Earth behaves…

 

   

 

… then that begs the question:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another couple of related questions:

 

 

You may have noticed the figure “2 quadrillion” mentioned above regarding the distance to Polaris…

Let’s put that in a bit of perspective…

433.8 “light years” to miles / kilometers:

The e+15 means that you multiply that number by 10 to the power of 15… which as shown in this table is called a “quadrillion”…

 

 

Quadrillion is equivalent to “a thousand trillion”… or “a million billion”…

 

 

Now, if stars are a quadrillion billion zillion gazillion miles away, do you really think it makes sense that people can use a simple handheld camera to take pictures of them?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clearly, anything that is even beyond the reach of Carl Sagan’s imagination is not something anyone can take pictures of with a camera.

 

Furthermore, if the distance to Polaris is that great, even the slightest change of angle due to the motion or rotation of the Earth would make Polaris move out of it’s position directly above the North pole…

 

 

If you want to do a simple experiment to visualize this, take a laser pointer and hold it on a basketball shining perpendicular to the surface of the ball, and shine it at a specific point on the wall – with that point representing Polaris.

Now turn or move the ball in any direction… and you will see that the laser pointer does not point at the “Polaris” point on the wall anymore.

 

Now imagine that that basketball is Earth, and it is spinning at 1,036mph, moving at 66,600mph around the sun, which is moving at 483,000mph…

 

The 7min clip in this video will illustrate this problem with parallax very clearly:

 

Now, are we really supposed to believe that Polaris has managed to stay in the same position for thousands of years – as evidenced by consistent navigation techniques throughout history that still work today, all whilst the Earth has moved trillions of miles in that time span?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here’s another anomaly to think about…

 

 

Here is a related question:

 

 

 

 

 

Despite these gigantic oversights, the priests of science will tell you that the star trails do work on a globe…

 

 

 

 

Here is a typical explanation that you’ll see that supposedly “proves” the globe model:

 

 

This is all very well and good…

… Except for the fact that it only accounts for the spin of the Earth itself… and doesn’t even begin to account for the Earth’s supposed movement of 66,600mph around the sun, which is itself moving at 483,000mph…

Needless to say, if the globe model was correct, we wouldn’t see perfectly circular star trails, but instead streaks more akin to the image shown below, given that the velocities of 483,000mph and 66,600mph far surpass the 1,036mph spin of the Earth.

 

 

Clearly, the globe model doesn’t make any sense whatsoever when we scrutinize what we see in the night sky.

 

Furthermore, along with the lack of visible evidence of the Earth moving, we don’t even feel any any of these motions… (as we went through in 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby)…

 

 

 

… But of course, the Earth is so big so we don’t feel anything right?

 

 

 

Here’s another example of disinformation on this subject:

 

 

The smarty-pants who made the illustration above has cleverly omitted the fact that the observatories’ telescopes can change vertical viewing angle and don’t have a default elevation angle that is constricted by their latitudinal location… but sadly there are probably people who fall for this…

 

 

 

 

To summarize this section, here is an excellent reality checker that spells out the situation with the star trails vs the globe clearly (along with one or two other things)…

 

 

Star Trails Explained: Part 1

This section will start to explain how the stars can appear to be moving the way they are in the night sky, though the material in Star Trails Explained: Part 2 (which will come in Section 6 below) will provide the full picture.

 

For starters, this 11min clip provides a useful study of the way the stars move. Some of the graphics you will see in this video are shown below this video.

 

 

 

Note that perspective as described here isn’t the entire answer for star trails, but is useful for understanding star trails nonetheless… (more on this in section 6 below).

If things don’t immediately make sense it may be useful to refer to the explanation on how perspective works in 18. Look Around, It Will Astound You.

 

 

This 2min video might help with visualizing what is going on as well, as it shows how the same effect seen in star trails in the domed night sky can be replicated on a reflective glass bowl….

 

 

 

There is another fascinating aspect to the stars relating to the star trails that we will look at in section 6, but before we look at that let’s take a look at an incredible tool that has largely been forgotten… the Astrolabe.

 

---

 

5. The Astrolabe

Introduction to the Astrolabe

If you were paying close attention a bit earlier, you may have noticed that the man in the picture shown earlier is holding a curious object…

 

 

This device is known as an astrolabe…

 

 

An astroplate is constructed using several flat discs, which you can read more about here…

 

 

Back in the day, people were far better educated about the sky objects and the relationship between time and their location than they are today, and many people would have been experts in the use of the astrolabe…

 

 

This 2min video will give you some basic insight into how an astrolabe works:

 

 

 

Geo-metry

Astrolabes are designed by people who have a very advanced knowledge of astronomy and geometry, though today there are very few people who have this knowledge…

The reason why so few have this amazing knowledge may be because of changes in how geometry has been studied and taught by our illustrious educational indoctrination institutions…

For example – to borrow some ideas from this video, here is how wikipedia depicts geometry in the 15th century and the 20th century:

 

Do you notice any difference between the two pictures?

 

 

… Like perhaps how geometer’s back in the day used to work outdoors (where they could point things at the sky),…

… and how “modern” geometer’s work exclusively indoors (where there is no sky)…

 

This seems rather absurd when you consider that the root words for geometry are “geo, meaning “earth“, and “metron“, meaning “measurement“!

 

 

Surely you need to be outdoors to “measure” the “earth” right?!

 

… But I suppose that we now have fancy blackboard equations and iPhones which can spoon-feed us everything we need to know, so nobody really needs to go outdoors to discover what is actually going on anymore…

 

 

 

 

 

Geometry was effectively switched from a system connecting the measurement of real world locations and time… to being a totally abstract spatial science studied exclusively on blackboards indoors…

This is why nobody even blinks when shown “projections” like those below, which are supposed to “explain” how the astrolabe can work in relation to a spherical sky – but which make no absolutely practical sense in the real world…

… because nobody has a clue what is actually going on outside anymore…

 

 

Most people today like to think that our ancestors up to 500 years ago were primitive idiots for thinking that the Earth was flat,…

… when the truth is that our ancestors designed tools like the astrolabe based entirely on their meticulous studies of nature and the stars.

That’s quite a contrast compared to our “modern” day, where most people get their understanding of nature from what they had been told in their textbooks and seen on television!

 

     

 

When you really look into this subject, it’s becomes astonishing that people were able to understand the stars so precisely so as to design the astrolabe – a truly magnificent tool that has hundreds of uses, a few of which are listed here:

 

 

Below is an interesting 9min video of a TEDx talk about the astrolabe.

What is particularly amusing is that the speaker is obliged to tell the audience that this device is compatible with a globe model… though as is painfully obvious it makes absolutely no sense with a globe…

 

 

Another interesting point to note with regards to the astrolabe is the distance measurement on it – the nautical mile…

 

The Nautical Mile

In essence, the nautical mile is defined as the distance spanned by one minute of arc along a meridian of the Earth (north-south), as you can visualize here:

 

 

A nautical mile used to be a minute of arc North-South – that is, one 60th of a degree…

Despite the fact that the nautical mile worked perfectly for centuries, the “Clarke Spheroid” model was introduced in 1866 which meant that a degree of North-South was no longer a simple length but varied at different latitudes… as mentioned on Wikipedia:

 

 

 

 

 

 

You don’t need to be a genius to figure out that if something works perfectly you don’t change it… unless of course you have other agenda’s…

 

So basically, when “scientists” introduced the sphere lie they had to tell all the people who had successfully navigated by sea using the nautical mile that the physical basis of their measurement unit had been wrong all this time… even though they had successfully navigated the world using it for centuries!

The funniest part is, that despite telling the world that the world is a sphere and that the nautical mile is wrong, the nautical mile is still to this day used for both air and marine navigation…

 

To state the obvious… if the Earth actually was a globe, don’t you think they’d be using navigational principles to navigate that are based on a sphere rather than a flat plane?

 

 

 

 

 

 

So to summarize…

 

Much like the sundial and the moon-dial, the astrolabe is comprised of flat circular discs and has worked perfectly all throughout history – and continues to be used to this day for navigation.

A good understanding of the astrolabe tells us that the Sun and the Moon share the same path on a flat plane in the sky… and that the star system is also moving in a flat plane above us… just as a planisphere suggests…

The Vedic (ancient Indian) astronomical model presents the celestial bodies as travelling on flat planes, as shown in this short 1:30 clip:

 

And on that bombshell, allow me to introduce you to the astroplate…

 

 

---

 

6. Astroplate

The astroplate might be a bit tricky to understand, so before we get into what the astroplate is, let me remind you of something we covered in 19. What Goes Around, Comes Around… 

 

Dome Reflection

Primarily, recall that the dome above us is a reflective surface, as evidenced by…

 

1. Rainbows – which can only be replicated indoors with a light source and a curved reflective surface, as discussed in this video.

 

2. Sun dogs, which are light effects due to reflection:

 

3. “Double-suns“, which show that the sun is reflecting off something:

 

4. Sunlight coverage throughout the year – including the 24hr sun in Antarctica, which shows that sunlight is reflecting off a domed surface to distribute the way it does:

Note that the sunlight coverage perfectly matches what we see in terms of sunrise and sunset times throughout the year:

Here’s a useful visual so that you can see the shape of the sunlight coverage relating to the shape of the dome:

 

Also recall from earlier that the stars spin anti-clockwise in the northern “hemisphere”, and clockwise in the southern “hemisphere”…

Here’s the star trails at the equator again for your reference:

 

 

Now then, what conclusions can we draw from the fact that the dome is reflective, and that the stars appear to be spinning in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres?

 

 

 

Well, the logical conclusion here is that the stars are being reflected on the dome as well…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s okay if you’re thinking this sounds a bit confusing…

 

… but perhaps this 3min video will start to clarify this…

 

 

Star Trails Explained: Part 2

The video above explains the general structure of the astroplate and the basics of reflection.

However, that animation doesn’t really show exactly how the opposite star spins in the northern and southern “hemispheres” works…

To better understand how the reflection works, take a look at the 4min video below which does a good job of replicating the star spin in a home-made setup.

The setup might look somewhat rudimentary, but it is very effective in illustrating how the opposite star spins occur, so don’t be put off just because it doesn’t involve advanced CGI and animations.

Also, let this be a reminder that real science is observable, measurable, and repeatable – even in your own living room!  🙂

 

In case you want to see more on the astroplate I highly recommend that you explore the YouTube channel Alternative Cosmology which has many more videos explaining how the astroplate works.

For example, here is another (15min) video from that channel that builds on what you’ve seen above and provides additional useful information about the astroplate:

 

 

This is probably more than enough information to keep your mind spinning in multiple directions for now, so we’ll leave it there.

Our study of the stars is by no means done though, so we’ll continue our look at the stars – and planets – in another post, when things will start to get really interesting!

 

---

 

Conclusion

To round things off, here’s a quick summary of what we’ve looked at in this post:

To start, we saw that the sun is not a star, and that the stars are not at all what we’ve been told.

You were then shown some videos involving cymatics, sonoluminescence, superconductivity, and quantum levitation, which go a long way to explaining what we are seeing in the sky.

We then moved on to deconstructing the parallax lie, before taking a dreamy look at star trails and the amazing astrolabe, which led us to study the astroplate.

In other words, a lot of awesome stuff that proves that we’ve been lied to about the stars.

 

This post has shone plenty of light on the lies we’ve been fed by these guys…

 

 

… but what you’ve seen so far doesn’t even scratch the surface of the knowledge being hidden from you.

Rest assured though, we’re going to be slicing through many more of their lies and hidden knowledge like a hot knife cutting through butter, so stay tuned! 🙂

 

 

To end this post, I will leave you with this 4min video which inspired the title of this post, and which might give you something deep to think about until the next post…

 

To be continued…

 

---

 

P.S.

Read more of The Narrow Gate

This blog is written like a book, so if you enjoyed this article, check out the Introductionpage as well as Table of Contents where you can find a chronological list of all material on this site, including short summaries of every article.

You can also navigate via the Start menu in the header:

 

 

Sharing is Caring!

If you like what you’re reading, please share far and wide!

Note that this site is not monetized. My only gain is to see more people waking up to the truth of this world.

Please help spread the truth by sharing links to this site on social media (eg. facebook groups, twitter, reddit, etc). Thanks in advance! 

 

 

Follow The Narrow Gate

Join me on social media, don’t be shy!

• ‘Friend’ me on Facebook: www.facebook.com/richard.kallberg
• Follow The Narrow Gate Facebook page: www.facebook.com/TheNarrowGateWeb/
• Follow me on Twitter: @RichardKallberg

 

For automatic email updates to alert you when new posts are published, simply subscribe by clicking on the “Follow” button which appears on the bottom right on this page when you scroll upwards slightly: